Randomized crossover trial on motor and non-motor outcome of directional deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Alireza Gharabaghi, Idil Cebi, Dallas Leavitt, Maximilian Scherer, Patrick Bookjans, Bastian Brunnett, Luka Milosevic, Daniel Weiss
{"title":"Randomized crossover trial on motor and non-motor outcome of directional deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease","authors":"Alireza Gharabaghi, Idil Cebi, Dallas Leavitt, Maximilian Scherer, Patrick Bookjans, Bastian Brunnett, Luka Milosevic, Daniel Weiss","doi":"10.1038/s41531-024-00812-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) with electric field steering may avoid areas responsible for side effects. This prospective randomized cross-over trial compared omnidirectional (OS) and directional (DS) subthalamic DBS in 19 patients. Electromyographically measured rigidity was the primary outcome. Motor and non-motor scores were secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences between OS and DS. In the acute setting, both conditions improved motor scores compared to no stimulation. Motor symptoms improved after 3 weeks of OS relative to acute measurements, whereas they worsened under DS. The more ventral the active contact, and the less the motor improvement sweet spot was stimulated, the greater the benefit of DS over OS for executive function. Accurate OS of the dorsal subthalamic nucleus ensures motor and non-motor improvements. While DS can mitigate executive decline stemming from off-target stimulation, it may lead to worse motor outcomes. Larger, long-term studies are needed to confirm these findings. (Registration: subthalamic steering for therapy optimization in Parkinson’s Disease ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03548506, 2018-06-06).</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00812-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) with electric field steering may avoid areas responsible for side effects. This prospective randomized cross-over trial compared omnidirectional (OS) and directional (DS) subthalamic DBS in 19 patients. Electromyographically measured rigidity was the primary outcome. Motor and non-motor scores were secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences between OS and DS. In the acute setting, both conditions improved motor scores compared to no stimulation. Motor symptoms improved after 3 weeks of OS relative to acute measurements, whereas they worsened under DS. The more ventral the active contact, and the less the motor improvement sweet spot was stimulated, the greater the benefit of DS over OS for executive function. Accurate OS of the dorsal subthalamic nucleus ensures motor and non-motor improvements. While DS can mitigate executive decline stemming from off-target stimulation, it may lead to worse motor outcomes. Larger, long-term studies are needed to confirm these findings. (Registration: subthalamic steering for therapy optimization in Parkinson’s Disease ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03548506, 2018-06-06).

Abstract Image

定向深部脑刺激治疗帕金森病的运动和非运动疗效随机交叉试验
带电场转向的脑深部刺激(DBS)可避开产生副作用的区域。这项前瞻性随机交叉试验比较了 19 名患者的全向(OS)和定向(DS)眼下丘脑 DBS。肌电图测量的僵硬度是主要结果。运动和非运动评分是次要结果。OS 和 DS 之间没有明显差异。在急性期,与无刺激相比,两种治疗方法都能改善运动评分。与急性期的测量结果相比,OS 3 周后运动症状有所改善,而 DS 则有所恶化。主动接触的腹侧越多,运动改善甜点受到的刺激越少,DS 比 OS 对执行功能的益处就越大。对背侧丘脑下核进行准确的 OS 可确保运动和非运动功能的改善。虽然DS可以缓解因脱靶刺激而导致的执行力下降,但它可能会导致更差的运动效果。需要进行更大规模的长期研究来证实这些发现。(注册:用于帕金森病治疗优化的丘脑下转向 ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03548506,2018-06-06)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信