First-Trimester Prediction Models Based on Maternal Characteristics for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jacintha C. A. van Eekhout, Ellis C. Becking, Peter G. Scheffer, Ioannis Koutsoliakos, Caroline J. Bax, Lidewij Henneman, Mireille N. Bekker, Ewoud Schuit
{"title":"First-Trimester Prediction Models Based on Maternal Characteristics for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jacintha C. A. van Eekhout,&nbsp;Ellis C. Becking,&nbsp;Peter G. Scheffer,&nbsp;Ioannis Koutsoliakos,&nbsp;Caroline J. Bax,&nbsp;Lidewij Henneman,&nbsp;Mireille N. Bekker,&nbsp;Ewoud Schuit","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Early risk stratification can facilitate timely interventions for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia (PE), small-for-gestational-age neonates (SGA), spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of first-trimester prediction models for adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search Strategy</h3>\n \n <p>The PubMed database was searched until 6 June 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\n \n <p>First-trimester prediction models based on maternal characteristics were included. Articles reporting on prediction models that comprised biochemical or ultrasound markers were excluded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\n \n <p>Two authors identified articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and applicability using PROBAST.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 77 articles were included, comprising 30 developed models for PE, 15 for SGA, 11 for sPTB and 35 for GDM. Discriminatory performance in terms of median area under the curve (AUC) of these models was 0.75 [IQR 0.69–0.78] for PE models, 0.62 [0.60–0.71] for SGA models of nulliparous women, 0.74 [0.72–0.74] for SGA models of multiparous women, 0.65 [0.61–0.67] for sPTB models of nulliparous women, 0.71 [0.68–0.74] for sPTB models of multiparous women and 0.71 [0.67–0.76] for GDM models. Internal validation was performed in 40/91 (43.9%) of the models. Model calibration was reported in 21/91 (23.1%) models. External validation was performed a total of 96 times in 45/91 (49.5%) of the models. High risk of bias was observed in 94.5% of the developed models and in 58.3% of the external validations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple first-trimester prediction models are available, but almost all suffer from high risk of bias, and internal and external validations were often not performed. Hence, methodological quality improvement and assessment of the clinical utility are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 3","pages":"243-265"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early risk stratification can facilitate timely interventions for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia (PE), small-for-gestational-age neonates (SGA), spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Objectives

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of first-trimester prediction models for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Search Strategy

The PubMed database was searched until 6 June 2024.

Selection Criteria

First-trimester prediction models based on maternal characteristics were included. Articles reporting on prediction models that comprised biochemical or ultrasound markers were excluded.

Data Collection and Analysis

Two authors identified articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and applicability using PROBAST.

Main results

A total of 77 articles were included, comprising 30 developed models for PE, 15 for SGA, 11 for sPTB and 35 for GDM. Discriminatory performance in terms of median area under the curve (AUC) of these models was 0.75 [IQR 0.69–0.78] for PE models, 0.62 [0.60–0.71] for SGA models of nulliparous women, 0.74 [0.72–0.74] for SGA models of multiparous women, 0.65 [0.61–0.67] for sPTB models of nulliparous women, 0.71 [0.68–0.74] for sPTB models of multiparous women and 0.71 [0.67–0.76] for GDM models. Internal validation was performed in 40/91 (43.9%) of the models. Model calibration was reported in 21/91 (23.1%) models. External validation was performed a total of 96 times in 45/91 (49.5%) of the models. High risk of bias was observed in 94.5% of the developed models and in 58.3% of the external validations.

Conclusions

Multiple first-trimester prediction models are available, but almost all suffer from high risk of bias, and internal and external validations were often not performed. Hence, methodological quality improvement and assessment of the clinical utility are needed.

Abstract Image

基于孕产妇特征的不良妊娠结局首胎预测模型:系统回顾和元分析
早期风险分层有助于及时干预不良妊娠结局,包括子痫前期(PE)、小于妊娠年龄新生儿(SGA)、自发性早产(sPTB)和妊娠糖尿病(GDM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信