Research on Ecological Compensation Based on Ecosystem Service Flow: A Case Study in Guangdong Province, China

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Xiuming Wang, Piao Liu, Chentao Wei, Naizhong Xu, Peng Zhao, Ding Wen
{"title":"Research on Ecological Compensation Based on Ecosystem Service Flow: A Case Study in Guangdong Province, China","authors":"Xiuming Wang, Piao Liu, Chentao Wei, Naizhong Xu, Peng Zhao, Ding Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecological compensation (EC) is not only an essential tool for correcting the externalities of ecosystem services (ESs) and fostering sustainable development but also a crucial means to alleviate poverty and promote balanced development across regions. Based on the ecosystem service flow (ESF) theory, this article presents a universal framework for screening ESs in EC research, and employs multiple models and multisource data to measure the supply and demand of five ESs. Moreover, this study examined the transfer values of air-mediated ESs (AMESs) and water-mediated ESs (WMESs) using the field strength model and flow allocation method, respectively, due to their significant differences in flow direction, flow rate and attenuation characteristics. The results indicate that: (1) there is a significant disparity between the supply and demand of the five ESs in Guangdong, with the scope and extent of the mismatch varying among the different ESs. Generally, deficit areas are located in the central urban regions of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) cities and cities in eastern and western Guangdong. (2) The transfer values of all the surplus areas of the AMESs and WMESs to their corresponding deficit areas are 37.02 billion yuan and 37.43 billion yuan, respectively, accounting for 62.9% of the AMESs supply value in the study area and 2.5% of the output value of the WMESs in the surplus areas, indicating that a significant amount of the output value has been transferred to areas outside of the study area. (3) The total transfer in/out value between surplus and deficit areas is 71.83 billion yuan, and is economically acceptable for deficit areas. (4) Compared with the results of this study, some economically developed regions with high ecosystem service value (ESV) outputs in Guangdong have not been compensated, and the current EC standard is relatively low. We suggest that Guangdong pilot horizontal EC, explore various market-oriented trading systems, and increase vertical EC standards and enrich EC methods. This study provides a reference for the quantification of ESFs with different transmission carriers and the improvement of EC policy in Guangdong.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological compensation (EC) is not only an essential tool for correcting the externalities of ecosystem services (ESs) and fostering sustainable development but also a crucial means to alleviate poverty and promote balanced development across regions. Based on the ecosystem service flow (ESF) theory, this article presents a universal framework for screening ESs in EC research, and employs multiple models and multisource data to measure the supply and demand of five ESs. Moreover, this study examined the transfer values of air-mediated ESs (AMESs) and water-mediated ESs (WMESs) using the field strength model and flow allocation method, respectively, due to their significant differences in flow direction, flow rate and attenuation characteristics. The results indicate that: (1) there is a significant disparity between the supply and demand of the five ESs in Guangdong, with the scope and extent of the mismatch varying among the different ESs. Generally, deficit areas are located in the central urban regions of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) cities and cities in eastern and western Guangdong. (2) The transfer values of all the surplus areas of the AMESs and WMESs to their corresponding deficit areas are 37.02 billion yuan and 37.43 billion yuan, respectively, accounting for 62.9% of the AMESs supply value in the study area and 2.5% of the output value of the WMESs in the surplus areas, indicating that a significant amount of the output value has been transferred to areas outside of the study area. (3) The total transfer in/out value between surplus and deficit areas is 71.83 billion yuan, and is economically acceptable for deficit areas. (4) Compared with the results of this study, some economically developed regions with high ecosystem service value (ESV) outputs in Guangdong have not been compensated, and the current EC standard is relatively low. We suggest that Guangdong pilot horizontal EC, explore various market-oriented trading systems, and increase vertical EC standards and enrich EC methods. This study provides a reference for the quantification of ESFs with different transmission carriers and the improvement of EC policy in Guangdong.
基于生态系统服务流的生态补偿研究:中国广东省案例研究
生态补偿(EC)不仅是纠正生态系统服务(ES)外部性、促进可持续发展的重要工具,也是扶贫和促进跨区域均衡发展的重要手段。本文以生态系统服务流(ESF)理论为基础,提出了在生态系统服务流研究中筛选生态系统服务的通用框架,并采用多种模型和多源数据测算了五种生态系统服务的供给和需求。此外,由于空气媒介环境服务(AMESs)和水媒介环境服务(WMESs)在流向、流速和衰减特性上存在显著差异,本研究分别采用场强模型和流量分配法对其传递值进行了检验。结果表明(1) 广东省 5 个水文站的供需存在显著差异,不同水文站的供需错配范围和程度不同。一般來說,短缺地區位於珠江三角洲("珠三角")城市的中心城 區和粵東、粵西城市。(2) 所有过剩地区的 AMES 和 WMES 向其对应的不足地区转移的产值分别为 370.2 亿元和 374.3 亿元,分别占研究区内 AMES 供应产值的 62.9%和过剩地区 WMES 产值的 2.5%,表明大量产值已转移到研究区以外的地区。(3)盈余地区与赤字地区之间的转移进出总值为 718.3 亿元,赤字地区在经济上是可以接受的。(4)与本研究结果相比,广东一些经济发达、生态系统服务价值(ESV)产出较高的地区尚未得到补偿,且目前的EC标准相对较低。建议广东省开展横向生态补偿试点,探索多种市场化交易制度,提高纵向生态补偿标准,丰富生态补偿方式。本研究为广东省量化不同输电载体的 ESF 和完善 EC 政策提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信