Jelena Levi, Millie Das, Minal S. Vasanawala, Deepti Behl, Martin Pomper, Patrick M. Forde, Erica Nakajima, James Sayre, Bin Shen, Hilda Cabrera, Niko Del Mar, Michele Gullen, Michele Pierini, Laura Cox, Ojaswita Lokre, Timothy Perk, Hee-Don Chae
{"title":"[18F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy","authors":"Jelena Levi, Millie Das, Minal S. Vasanawala, Deepti Behl, Martin Pomper, Patrick M. Forde, Erica Nakajima, James Sayre, Bin Shen, Hilda Cabrera, Niko Del Mar, Michele Gullen, Michele Pierini, Laura Cox, Ojaswita Lokre, Timothy Perk, Hee-Don Chae","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the systemic impact of both cancer and the associated immune response, immuno-PET is predominantly centered on assessment of the immune milieu within the tumor microenvironment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG PET imaging as a noninvasive method for evaluation of system-wide immune status of patients with non–small cell lung cancer before starting immunotherapy. <strong>Methods:</strong> Eleven patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer were imaged with [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG before starting immunotherapy. Diagnostic [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans were analyzed to assess differences in the extent of disease among patients. SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and total SUV (SUV<sub>total</sub>) from all tumor lesions, active lymph nodes, spleen, vertebral bone marrow, liver, thyroid, heart, and bowel were extracted from the baseline [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG scans, and discriminant and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to test their ability to predict patient response and overall survival. <strong>Results:</strong> The extent of the disease was variable in the patient cohort, but none of the [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG biomarkers associated with tumor burden (SUV<sub>max</sub>, total metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis) was predictive of patient survival. The differences in the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG distribution were observed both within and between lesions, confirming that they capture distinct aspects of the tumor microenvironment. Of the 3 SUV parameters studied, [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG SUV<sub>total</sub> provided a dynamic range suitable for stratifying tumors or patients according to their immune activity. [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG SUV<sub>total</sub> measured in the lumbar and sacral vertebrae differentiated between patients who progressed on therapy and those who did not with 90.9% and 81.8% accuracy, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with high [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG SUV<sub>total</sub> in the lumbar bone marrow had significantly lower probability of survival than those with a low signal (<em>P</em> = 0.0003). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study highlights the significance of assessing systemic immunity and indicates the potential of the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG bone marrow signal as a predictive imaging biomarker for patient stratification and treatment guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the systemic impact of both cancer and the associated immune response, immuno-PET is predominantly centered on assessment of the immune milieu within the tumor microenvironment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of [18F]F-AraG PET imaging as a noninvasive method for evaluation of system-wide immune status of patients with non–small cell lung cancer before starting immunotherapy. Methods: Eleven patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer were imaged with [18F]F-AraG before starting immunotherapy. Diagnostic [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were analyzed to assess differences in the extent of disease among patients. SUVmax, SUVmean, and total SUV (SUVtotal) from all tumor lesions, active lymph nodes, spleen, vertebral bone marrow, liver, thyroid, heart, and bowel were extracted from the baseline [18F]F-AraG scans, and discriminant and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to test their ability to predict patient response and overall survival. Results: The extent of the disease was variable in the patient cohort, but none of the [18F]FDG biomarkers associated with tumor burden (SUVmax, total metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis) was predictive of patient survival. The differences in the [18F]F-AraG and [18F]FDG distribution were observed both within and between lesions, confirming that they capture distinct aspects of the tumor microenvironment. Of the 3 SUV parameters studied, [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal provided a dynamic range suitable for stratifying tumors or patients according to their immune activity. [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal measured in the lumbar and sacral vertebrae differentiated between patients who progressed on therapy and those who did not with 90.9% and 81.8% accuracy, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with high [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal in the lumbar bone marrow had significantly lower probability of survival than those with a low signal (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of assessing systemic immunity and indicates the potential of the [18F]F-AraG bone marrow signal as a predictive imaging biomarker for patient stratification and treatment guidance.
尽管癌症和相关免疫反应都会对全身产生影响,但免疫 PET 主要侧重于评估肿瘤微环境中的免疫环境。本研究旨在评估[18F]F-AraG PET 成像作为一种非侵入性方法的价值,用于评估非小细胞肺癌患者在开始免疫治疗前的全系统免疫状态。研究方法11名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者在开始免疫治疗前接受了[18F]F-AraG成像。对诊断性[18F]FDG PET/CT扫描进行分析,以评估不同患者疾病范围的差异。从基线[18F]F-AraG扫描中提取所有肿瘤病灶、活动淋巴结、脾脏、脊椎骨骨髓、肝脏、甲状腺、心脏和肠道的SUVmax、SUVmean和总SUV(SUVtotal),并进行判别分析和Kaplan-Meier分析,以检验它们预测患者反应和总生存期的能力。结果患者队列中的疾病程度各不相同,但与肿瘤负荷相关的[18F]FDG生物标记物(SUVmax、肿瘤总代谢体积和病变总糖酵解量)都不能预测患者的生存期。[18F]F-AraG和[18F]FDG分布在病灶内部和病灶之间都存在差异,这证实它们捕捉到了肿瘤微环境的不同方面。在所研究的 3 个 SUV 参数中,[18F]F-AraG SUV 总值的动态范围适合根据肿瘤或患者的免疫活性对其进行分层。在腰椎和骶椎测量的[18F]F-AraG SUVtotal区分治疗进展和未进展患者的准确率分别为90.9%和81.8%。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,腰椎骨髓中[18F]F-AraG SUVtotal 信号高的患者生存概率明显低于信号低的患者(P = 0.0003)。结论这项研究强调了评估全身免疫的重要性,并表明[18F]F-AraG骨髓信号作为预测性成像生物标志物在患者分层和治疗指导方面的潜力。