Impact of flooding at the early reproductive growth stage on soybean yield and seed composition

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21397
Chengjun Wu, Liliana Florez‐Palacios, Andrea Acuna, Derrick Harrison, Daniel Rogers, John Carlin, Leandro Mozzoni, Henry T. Nguyen, Grover Shannon, Caio Canella Vieira
{"title":"Impact of flooding at the early reproductive growth stage on soybean yield and seed composition","authors":"Chengjun Wu, Liliana Florez‐Palacios, Andrea Acuna, Derrick Harrison, Daniel Rogers, John Carlin, Leandro Mozzoni, Henry T. Nguyen, Grover Shannon, Caio Canella Vieira","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flooding stress is a growing threat to global soybean [<jats:italic>Glycine max</jats:italic> (L.) Merr.] production as the frequency and intensity of extreme precipitations are increasing due to climate change. Soybean is highly sensitive to flooding and substantial yield losses are observed due to a cascade of negative physiological responses induced by hypoxia. Hence, there is a pressing need for the development of flood‐tolerant genotypes. This study evaluated the grain yield and seed protein and oil content of 31 soybean genotypes over 2 years under both non‐flooding and flooding conditions, where flooding entailed a 4‐day partial water submergence during the early reproductive growth stages R1/R2. Mixed‐effects linear models were utilized to assess the impact of flood damage scores (FDSs, 1–4 scale) on observed phenotypes, as well as differences in observed phenotypes between tolerant, moderate, and susceptible genotypes across flooding and non‐flooding treatments. No significant impact of FDS was observed for seed protein and oil content. In addition, no significant differences in these phenotypes were observed between flooding and non‐flooding treatments across the various genotype categories. On average, for each unit increase in FDS, grain yield decreased by 432.7 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (17.4%). Tolerant genotypes experienced roughly 33% yield losses between flooding and non‐flooding treatments, while moderate and susceptible genotypes experienced 44% and 51% yield losses, respectively. The advancements in genomics and phenomics are promising for the identification and incorporation of novel flood‐tolerant alleles through plant breeding, potentially mitigating flooding‐induced yield losses across diverse environmental conditions.","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flooding stress is a growing threat to global soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production as the frequency and intensity of extreme precipitations are increasing due to climate change. Soybean is highly sensitive to flooding and substantial yield losses are observed due to a cascade of negative physiological responses induced by hypoxia. Hence, there is a pressing need for the development of flood‐tolerant genotypes. This study evaluated the grain yield and seed protein and oil content of 31 soybean genotypes over 2 years under both non‐flooding and flooding conditions, where flooding entailed a 4‐day partial water submergence during the early reproductive growth stages R1/R2. Mixed‐effects linear models were utilized to assess the impact of flood damage scores (FDSs, 1–4 scale) on observed phenotypes, as well as differences in observed phenotypes between tolerant, moderate, and susceptible genotypes across flooding and non‐flooding treatments. No significant impact of FDS was observed for seed protein and oil content. In addition, no significant differences in these phenotypes were observed between flooding and non‐flooding treatments across the various genotype categories. On average, for each unit increase in FDS, grain yield decreased by 432.7 kg ha−1 (17.4%). Tolerant genotypes experienced roughly 33% yield losses between flooding and non‐flooding treatments, while moderate and susceptible genotypes experienced 44% and 51% yield losses, respectively. The advancements in genomics and phenomics are promising for the identification and incorporation of novel flood‐tolerant alleles through plant breeding, potentially mitigating flooding‐induced yield losses across diverse environmental conditions.
生殖生长初期的洪水对大豆产量和种子成分的影响
由于气候变化,极端降水的频率和强度不断增加,洪水胁迫对全球大豆 [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 生产的威胁日益严重。大豆对洪水高度敏感,缺氧诱发的一连串负面生理反应导致产量大幅下降。因此,迫切需要开发耐涝基因型。本研究评估了 31 种大豆基因型在非淹水和淹水条件下两年的谷物产量、种子蛋白质和油含量。利用混合效应线性模型评估了洪水损害评分(FDS,1-4 级)对观察到的表型的影响,以及在洪水和非洪水处理中耐受、中等和易感基因型之间观察到的表型差异。未观察到 FDS 对种子蛋白质和含油量有明显影响。此外,在淹水和非淹水处理之间,也没有观察到这些表型在不同基因型类别中存在明显差异。平均而言,FDS 每增加一个单位,谷物产量就会减少 432.7 千克/公顷(17.4%)。耐淹基因型在洪水和非洪水处理之间的产量损失约为 33%,而中等和易感基因型的产量损失分别为 44% 和 51%。基因组学和表型组学的进步有望通过植物育种鉴定和整合新型耐洪水等位基因,从而减轻洪水在不同环境条件下造成的产量损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信