Comparative analysis of methodologies for detecting extrachromosomal circular DNA

IF 14.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xuyuan Gao, Ke Liu, Songwen Luo, Meifang Tang, Nianping Liu, Chen Jiang, Jingwen Fang, Shouzhen Li, Yanbing Hou, Chuang Guo, Kun Qu
{"title":"Comparative analysis of methodologies for detecting extrachromosomal circular DNA","authors":"Xuyuan Gao, Ke Liu, Songwen Luo, Meifang Tang, Nianping Liu, Chen Jiang, Jingwen Fang, Shouzhen Li, Yanbing Hou, Chuang Guo, Kun Qu","doi":"10.1038/s41467-024-53496-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) is crucial in oncogene amplification, gene transcription regulation, and intratumor heterogeneity. While various analysis pipelines and experimental methods have been developed for eccDNA identification, their detection efficiencies have not been systematically assessed. To address this, we evaluate the performance of 7 analysis pipelines using seven simulated datasets, in terms of accuracy, identity, duplication rate, and computational resource consumption. We also compare the eccDNA detection efficiency of 7 experimental methods through twenty-one real sequencing datasets. Here, we show that Circle-Map and Circle_finder (bwa-mem-samblaster) outperform the other short-read pipelines. However, Circle_finder (bwa-mem-samblaster) exhibits notable redundancy in its outcomes. CReSIL is the most effective pipeline for eccDNA detection in long-read sequencing data at depths higher than 10X. Moreover, long-read sequencing-based Circle-Seq shows superior efficiency in detecting copy number-amplified eccDNA over 10 kb in length. These results offer valuable insights for researchers in choosing the suitable methods for eccDNA research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53496-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) is crucial in oncogene amplification, gene transcription regulation, and intratumor heterogeneity. While various analysis pipelines and experimental methods have been developed for eccDNA identification, their detection efficiencies have not been systematically assessed. To address this, we evaluate the performance of 7 analysis pipelines using seven simulated datasets, in terms of accuracy, identity, duplication rate, and computational resource consumption. We also compare the eccDNA detection efficiency of 7 experimental methods through twenty-one real sequencing datasets. Here, we show that Circle-Map and Circle_finder (bwa-mem-samblaster) outperform the other short-read pipelines. However, Circle_finder (bwa-mem-samblaster) exhibits notable redundancy in its outcomes. CReSIL is the most effective pipeline for eccDNA detection in long-read sequencing data at depths higher than 10X. Moreover, long-read sequencing-based Circle-Seq shows superior efficiency in detecting copy number-amplified eccDNA over 10 kb in length. These results offer valuable insights for researchers in choosing the suitable methods for eccDNA research.

Abstract Image

染色体外环状 DNA 检测方法的比较分析
染色体外环状 DNA(eccDNA)在癌基因扩增、基因转录调控和肿瘤内异质性中起着关键作用。虽然目前已开发出多种用于鉴定ccDNA的分析管道和实验方法,但尚未对其检测效率进行系统评估。为了解决这个问题,我们使用七个模拟数据集评估了七个分析管道在准确性、特征、重复率和计算资源消耗方面的性能。我们还通过 21 个真实测序数据集比较了 7 种实验方法的 eccDNA 检测效率。结果表明,Circle-Map 和 Circle_finder(bwa-mem-samblaster)优于其他短读取管道。不过,Circle_finder(bwa-mem-samblaster)在其结果中表现出明显的冗余。CReSIL 是在深度超过 10 倍的长读程测序数据中检测 eccDNA 最有效的管道。此外,基于长线程测序的 Circle-Seq 在检测长度超过 10 kb 的拷贝数扩增的 eccDNA 方面表现出更高的效率。这些结果为研究人员选择合适的 eccDNA 研究方法提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信