Identifying modifiable factors and their joint effect on frailty: a large population-based prospective cohort study

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ling-Zhi Ma, Yi-Jun Ge, Yi Zhang, Xi-Han Cui, Jian-Feng Feng, Wei Cheng, Lan Tan, Jin-Tai Yu
{"title":"Identifying modifiable factors and their joint effect on frailty: a large population-based prospective cohort study","authors":"Ling-Zhi Ma, Yi-Jun Ge, Yi Zhang, Xi-Han Cui, Jian-Feng Feng, Wei Cheng, Lan Tan, Jin-Tai Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11357-024-01395-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A thorough understanding and identification of potential determinants leading to frailty are imperative for the development of targeted interventions aimed at its prevention or mitigation. We investigated the potential determinants of frailty in a cohort of 469,301 UK Biobank participants. The evaluation of frailty was performed using the Fried index, which encompasses measurements of handgrip strength, gait speed, levels of physical activity, unintentional weight loss, and self-reported exhaustion. EWAS including 276 factors were first conducted. Factors associated with frailty in EWAS were further combined to generate composite scores for different domains, and joint associations with frailty were evaluated in a multivariate logistic model. The potential impact on frailty when eliminating unfavorable profiles of risk domains was evaluated by PAFs. A total of 21,020 (4.4%) participants were considered frailty, 192,183 (41.0%) pre-frailty, and 256,098 (54.6%) robust. The largest EWAS identified 90 modifiable factors for frailty across ten domains, each of which independently increased the risk of frailty. Among these factors, 67 have the potential to negatively impact health, while 23 have been found to have a protective effect. When shifting all unfavorable profiles to intermediate and favorable ones, overall adjusted PAF for potentially modifiable frailty risk factors was 85.9%, which increases to 86.6% if all factors are transformed into favorable tertiles. Health and medical history, psychosocial factors, and physical activity were the most significant contributors, accounting for 11.9%, 10.4%, and 10.1% respectively. This study offers valuable insights for developing population-level strategies aimed at preventing frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01395-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A thorough understanding and identification of potential determinants leading to frailty are imperative for the development of targeted interventions aimed at its prevention or mitigation. We investigated the potential determinants of frailty in a cohort of 469,301 UK Biobank participants. The evaluation of frailty was performed using the Fried index, which encompasses measurements of handgrip strength, gait speed, levels of physical activity, unintentional weight loss, and self-reported exhaustion. EWAS including 276 factors were first conducted. Factors associated with frailty in EWAS were further combined to generate composite scores for different domains, and joint associations with frailty were evaluated in a multivariate logistic model. The potential impact on frailty when eliminating unfavorable profiles of risk domains was evaluated by PAFs. A total of 21,020 (4.4%) participants were considered frailty, 192,183 (41.0%) pre-frailty, and 256,098 (54.6%) robust. The largest EWAS identified 90 modifiable factors for frailty across ten domains, each of which independently increased the risk of frailty. Among these factors, 67 have the potential to negatively impact health, while 23 have been found to have a protective effect. When shifting all unfavorable profiles to intermediate and favorable ones, overall adjusted PAF for potentially modifiable frailty risk factors was 85.9%, which increases to 86.6% if all factors are transformed into favorable tertiles. Health and medical history, psychosocial factors, and physical activity were the most significant contributors, accounting for 11.9%, 10.4%, and 10.1% respectively. This study offers valuable insights for developing population-level strategies aimed at preventing frailty.

Abstract Image

确定可改变的因素及其对虚弱的共同影响:一项大型人群前瞻性队列研究
透彻了解和识别导致虚弱的潜在决定因素对于制定有针对性的干预措施以预防或减轻虚弱至关重要。我们在英国生物库的 469,301 名参与者中调查了导致虚弱的潜在决定因素。对虚弱的评估采用弗里德指数(Fried index),该指数包括手握力、步速、体力活动水平、无意中的体重减轻和自我报告的疲惫程度。首先进行了包括 276 个因素的 EWAS。将 EWAS 中与虚弱相关的因素进一步合并,得出不同领域的综合得分,并在多变量逻辑模型中评估与虚弱的共同关联。通过 PAFs 评估了剔除风险领域的不利特征后对虚弱的潜在影响。共有 21,020 人(4.4%)被认为是体弱者,192,183 人(41.0%)被认为是体弱前期,256,098 人(54.6%)被认为是健壮者。最大规模的 EWAS 在 10 个领域中发现了 90 个可改变的虚弱因素,每个因素都会独立增加虚弱的风险。在这些因素中,67 个可能会对健康产生负面影响,而 23 个则具有保护作用。当将所有不利因素转化为中间和有利因素时,潜在可改变的虚弱风险因素的总体调整后PAF为85.9%,如果将所有因素转化为有利的三分位数,则PAF增加到86.6%。健康和病史、社会心理因素以及身体活动是最重要的因素,分别占 11.9%、10.4% 和 10.1%。这项研究为制定旨在预防体弱的人群策略提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信