Risk of type-2-diabetes after breast cancer treatment: a population-based cohort study in Denmark

Kasper A Kjærgaard, Astrid Kousholt, Reimar W Thomsen, Kirsten M Woolpert, Henrik T Sørensen, Signe Borgquist, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton
{"title":"Risk of type-2-diabetes after breast cancer treatment: a population-based cohort study in Denmark","authors":"Kasper A Kjærgaard, Astrid Kousholt, Reimar W Thomsen, Kirsten M Woolpert, Henrik T Sørensen, Signe Borgquist, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Data on type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk after breast cancer (BC) could guide preventive strategies. Yet, studies had limitations regarding sample size, follow-up, and contemporary treatments. We evaluated the risk of T2D after BC overall, by cancer treatment, and compared with a matched cohort of cancer-free women. Methods We assembled a population-based cohort of early-stage BC patients aged ≥30 years diagnosed during 1996-2021 in Denmark. We created a comparison cohort of five cancer- and T2D-free women for each BC case, matched six months after BC diagnosis date on age and region. We followed both cohorts until T2D diagnosis, emigration, death, or December 31, 2022. We computed 5-year cumulative incidences and used Cox models to calculate time-varying adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of T2D. Results Among 74,526 BC survivors and 372,630 matched cancer-free women, 5-year cumulative incidences of T2D were 3.8% (95%CI = 3.7-3.9) and 3.3% (95%CI = 3.3-3.4), respectively. The aHR of T2D was elevated but attenuated over follow-up (aHR5-years=1.20, 95%CI = 1.15-1.25, and aHR15-years=1.09, 95%CI = 1.05-1.12). Adjuvant endocrine therapy (aHR = 1.14; 95%CI = 1.10-1.19), aromatase inhibitors (aHR = 1.25; 95%CI = 1.18-1.32), and less so tamoxifen (aHR = 1.05; 95%CI = 0.99-1.11), were associated with elevated risk of T2D in women with BC vs cancer-free women. Among BC patients, chemotherapy (aHR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.03-1.17) and radiation therapy (right-sided aHR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.09-1.27 and left-sided aHR = 1.24, 95%CI = 1.15-1.33) were associated with increased T2D risk. Conclusion BC was associated with excess risk of T2D, though of lower magnitude than previously reported. The excess risk was temporary and related to BC treatment but could also be influenced by obesity and heightened T2D diagnostic activity.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Data on type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk after breast cancer (BC) could guide preventive strategies. Yet, studies had limitations regarding sample size, follow-up, and contemporary treatments. We evaluated the risk of T2D after BC overall, by cancer treatment, and compared with a matched cohort of cancer-free women. Methods We assembled a population-based cohort of early-stage BC patients aged ≥30 years diagnosed during 1996-2021 in Denmark. We created a comparison cohort of five cancer- and T2D-free women for each BC case, matched six months after BC diagnosis date on age and region. We followed both cohorts until T2D diagnosis, emigration, death, or December 31, 2022. We computed 5-year cumulative incidences and used Cox models to calculate time-varying adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of T2D. Results Among 74,526 BC survivors and 372,630 matched cancer-free women, 5-year cumulative incidences of T2D were 3.8% (95%CI = 3.7-3.9) and 3.3% (95%CI = 3.3-3.4), respectively. The aHR of T2D was elevated but attenuated over follow-up (aHR5-years=1.20, 95%CI = 1.15-1.25, and aHR15-years=1.09, 95%CI = 1.05-1.12). Adjuvant endocrine therapy (aHR = 1.14; 95%CI = 1.10-1.19), aromatase inhibitors (aHR = 1.25; 95%CI = 1.18-1.32), and less so tamoxifen (aHR = 1.05; 95%CI = 0.99-1.11), were associated with elevated risk of T2D in women with BC vs cancer-free women. Among BC patients, chemotherapy (aHR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.03-1.17) and radiation therapy (right-sided aHR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.09-1.27 and left-sided aHR = 1.24, 95%CI = 1.15-1.33) were associated with increased T2D risk. Conclusion BC was associated with excess risk of T2D, though of lower magnitude than previously reported. The excess risk was temporary and related to BC treatment but could also be influenced by obesity and heightened T2D diagnostic activity.
乳腺癌治疗后患 2 型糖尿病的风险:丹麦一项基于人群的队列研究
目的 有关乳腺癌(BC)后 2 型糖尿病(T2D)风险的数据可为预防策略提供指导。然而,这些研究在样本量、随访和当代治疗方面存在局限性。我们评估了乳腺癌术后发生 T2D 的总体风险、癌症治疗的风险,并与无癌症妇女的匹配队列进行了比较。方法 我们收集了丹麦 1996-2021 年间确诊的年龄≥30 岁的早期 BC 患者,并以此为基础建立了一个人群队列。我们为每例乳腺癌患者建立了一个由五名未患癌症和未患 T2D 的女性组成的对比队列,并在乳腺癌确诊日期后六个月根据年龄和地区进行配对。我们对这两个队列进行了跟踪调查,直至确诊 T2D、移民、死亡或 2022 年 12 月 31 日。我们计算了 5 年的累积发病率,并使用 Cox 模型计算了 T2D 的时变调整危险比 (aHR)。结果 在 74,526 名 BC 幸存者和 372,630 名匹配的无癌症女性中,T2D 的 5 年累积发病率分别为 3.8%(95%CI = 3.7-3.9)和 3.3%(95%CI = 3.3-3.4)。T2D的aHR升高,但在随访期间有所降低(aHR5年=1.20,95%CI=1.15-1.25;aHR15年=1.09,95%CI=1.05-1.12)。辅助内分泌治疗(aHR=1.14;95%CI=1.10-1.19)、芳香化酶抑制剂(aHR=1.25;95%CI=1.18-1.32)以及他莫昔芬(aHR=1.05;95%CI=0.99-1.11)与BC女性与未患癌症女性的T2D风险升高有关。在 BC 患者中,化疗(aHR = 1.10,95%CI = 1.03-1.17)和放疗(右侧 aHR = 1.18,95%CI = 1.09-1.27 和左侧 aHR = 1.24,95%CI = 1.15-1.33)与 T2D 风险增加有关。结论 BC与T2D的超额风险有关,但其程度低于之前的报道。超额风险是暂时的,与 BC 治疗有关,但也可能受到肥胖和 T2D 诊断活动增加的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信