{"title":"Sensitizing nursing faculty about formation of professional identity: Exploration of lessons learnt at a nursing institute in India.","authors":"Himanshu Pandya, Amol Dongre, Sarmishtha Ghosh, Anusha Prabhakaran, R Harihara Prakash, Shailesh Panchal, Jagdish Varma","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_705_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background We initiated a conversation regarding the concept of professional identity formation (PIF) with faculty of Institute of Nursing at our university through a participatory workshop. We report the planning and conduct of the workshop, as well as lessons learnt from the discussions in the workshop. Methods We designed and implemented a day-long workshop for 28 nursing faculty at Institute of Nursing, Bhaikaka University, Gujarat. The expected learning outcomes of the workshop were to: (i) understand the concept of PIF and process of socialization; (ii) identify factors influencing socialization; and (iii) discuss strategies to support PIF. The workshop included a series of four small group discussions, each followed by debriefing. We collected feedback using a questionnaire with 4 open-ended questions and written reflections on the learnings, within 2 days of the workshop. We carried out manual content analysis of text data generated during group work, reflections and feedback. Results Twenty-six of the 28 participants responded to the questionnaire. Thirteen mentioned interactions during group activities and discussions with facilitators as a good part of the workshop. Constructive suggestions on improving the workshop were received from 13 respondents. Twenty-three respondents reported they would make changes in their practice after the workshop. Five respondents found the activity on roles and responses during socialization as needing more discussion. Key themes identified from the participants' reflections were: (i) their different views about professional identity, (ii) experiences and reactions and (iii) their future action plan. Conclusions The workshop was well received by the participants. Our approach to the workshop might help other institutions design and implement similar activities as a part of their faculty development programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"37 3","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_705_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background We initiated a conversation regarding the concept of professional identity formation (PIF) with faculty of Institute of Nursing at our university through a participatory workshop. We report the planning and conduct of the workshop, as well as lessons learnt from the discussions in the workshop. Methods We designed and implemented a day-long workshop for 28 nursing faculty at Institute of Nursing, Bhaikaka University, Gujarat. The expected learning outcomes of the workshop were to: (i) understand the concept of PIF and process of socialization; (ii) identify factors influencing socialization; and (iii) discuss strategies to support PIF. The workshop included a series of four small group discussions, each followed by debriefing. We collected feedback using a questionnaire with 4 open-ended questions and written reflections on the learnings, within 2 days of the workshop. We carried out manual content analysis of text data generated during group work, reflections and feedback. Results Twenty-six of the 28 participants responded to the questionnaire. Thirteen mentioned interactions during group activities and discussions with facilitators as a good part of the workshop. Constructive suggestions on improving the workshop were received from 13 respondents. Twenty-three respondents reported they would make changes in their practice after the workshop. Five respondents found the activity on roles and responses during socialization as needing more discussion. Key themes identified from the participants' reflections were: (i) their different views about professional identity, (ii) experiences and reactions and (iii) their future action plan. Conclusions The workshop was well received by the participants. Our approach to the workshop might help other institutions design and implement similar activities as a part of their faculty development programme.