Autonomic Response Latency Revisited: Assessment of Repeatability in Healthy Subjects.

IF 0.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Advanced biomedical research Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/abr.abr_409_23
Annie S Jose, Shival Srivastav, Bharati Mehta
{"title":"Autonomic Response Latency Revisited: Assessment of Repeatability in Healthy Subjects.","authors":"Annie S Jose, Shival Srivastav, Bharati Mehta","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_409_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autonomic function assessment provides valuable information regarding the status of the autonomic nervous system. The time lag between the onset of orthostasis and the peak/nadir of heart rate response is a surrogate of the integrity of underlying autonomic neural pathways. Autonomic response latency (ARL) is a relatively novel yet underreported parameter in this context. Test-retest repeatability of this parameter has not been evaluated previously.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recruited 31 healthy adults (17 males and 14 females; 29.00 ± 5.44 years) and subjected them to postural challenge tests on five instances - forenoon and afternoon of day 1, the next day, 1 week later, and 1 month later. Tachycardia and bradycardia latencies (TL and BL) were computed using heart rate derived from digital ECG data. Repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICCs for TL and BL were 0.69 (0.56, 0.82) and 0.77 (0.66, 0.87), respectively. The CoVs for TL and BL were 14.8% and 12.4%, respectively. Sex-based subgroup analysis revealed ICCs for TL and BL in males to be 0.71 (0.53, 0.86) and 0.74 (0.57, 0.88) and in females to be 0.68 (0.64, 0.86) and 0.82 (0.66, 0.93), respectively. CoVs for TL and BL were 14.4% and 13.8% in male subjects and 15.4% and 10.7% in female subjects, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARL to orthostatic challenge demonstrated moderate to good test-retest repeatability. Based on our observations, we propose that ARL has potential as a consistent and repeatable index for the assessment of the integrity of autonomic neural pathways and therefore can help in the diagnosis of autonomic neuropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94292,"journal":{"name":"Advanced biomedical research","volume":"13 ","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_409_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autonomic function assessment provides valuable information regarding the status of the autonomic nervous system. The time lag between the onset of orthostasis and the peak/nadir of heart rate response is a surrogate of the integrity of underlying autonomic neural pathways. Autonomic response latency (ARL) is a relatively novel yet underreported parameter in this context. Test-retest repeatability of this parameter has not been evaluated previously.

Materials and methods: We recruited 31 healthy adults (17 males and 14 females; 29.00 ± 5.44 years) and subjected them to postural challenge tests on five instances - forenoon and afternoon of day 1, the next day, 1 week later, and 1 month later. Tachycardia and bradycardia latencies (TL and BL) were computed using heart rate derived from digital ECG data. Repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV).

Results: ICCs for TL and BL were 0.69 (0.56, 0.82) and 0.77 (0.66, 0.87), respectively. The CoVs for TL and BL were 14.8% and 12.4%, respectively. Sex-based subgroup analysis revealed ICCs for TL and BL in males to be 0.71 (0.53, 0.86) and 0.74 (0.57, 0.88) and in females to be 0.68 (0.64, 0.86) and 0.82 (0.66, 0.93), respectively. CoVs for TL and BL were 14.4% and 13.8% in male subjects and 15.4% and 10.7% in female subjects, respectively.

Conclusion: ARL to orthostatic challenge demonstrated moderate to good test-retest repeatability. Based on our observations, we propose that ARL has potential as a consistent and repeatable index for the assessment of the integrity of autonomic neural pathways and therefore can help in the diagnosis of autonomic neuropathy.

重新审视自律神经反应潜伏期:评估健康受试者的可重复性
背景:自律神经功能评估可提供有关自律神经系统状态的宝贵信息。直立开始与心率反应峰值/阈值之间的时滞是潜在自律神经通路完整性的代用指标。在这方面,自主神经反应潜伏期(ARL)是一个相对新颖但报告不足的参数。此前尚未对该参数的测试重复性进行过评估:我们招募了 31 名健康成年人(17 名男性和 14 名女性;29.00 ± 5.44 岁),让他们在五次情况下接受体位挑战测试--第 1 天的上午和下午、第二天、1 周后和 1 个月后。心动过速和心动过缓潜伏期(TL 和 BL)是通过数字心电图数据得出的心率计算得出的。使用类内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CoV)评估重复性:TL 和 BL 的 ICC 分别为 0.69 (0.56, 0.82) 和 0.77 (0.66, 0.87)。TL和BL的CoV分别为14.8%和12.4%。基于性别的亚组分析显示,男性 TL 和 BL 的 ICC 分别为 0.71 (0.53, 0.86) 和 0.74 (0.57, 0.88),女性分别为 0.68 (0.64, 0.86) 和 0.82 (0.66, 0.93)。男性受试者TL和BL的CoV分别为14.4%和13.8%,女性受试者分别为15.4%和10.7%:结论:ARL 对正压挑战表现出中等至良好的测试重复性。根据我们的观察,我们认为 ARL 有可能成为评估自律神经通路完整性的一致且可重复的指标,因此有助于诊断自律神经病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信