Advance Care Planning: A Retrospective Audit in a National Referral Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases.

Lian Trapman, Marieke Zwakman, Everlien de Graaf, Lea M Dijksman, Jan C Grutters, Saskia C C M Teunissen
{"title":"Advance Care Planning: A Retrospective Audit in a National Referral Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases.","authors":"Lian Trapman, Marieke Zwakman, Everlien de Graaf, Lea M Dijksman, Jan C Grutters, Saskia C C M Teunissen","doi":"10.1177/10499091241267914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (IPF/PPF) of known cause are relatively rare lung diseases with a limited survival time after diagnosis. Conscious attention for palliative care is recommended. Optimal care requires collaboration to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care with the patient and their families, to inform (or enable) Advance Care Planning (ACP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To get insight into the frequency of key elements of ACP described after dialogues with patients with IPF/PPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit included charts of patients with IPF/PPF who died between December 2017 and December 2020. A data extraction model was developed based on a guideline for patient federation and wider literature and finally consisted of fourteen key elements. Subsequently content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The medical charts of 60 patients showed that an element of ACP was recorded in 57(95%) of cases. No medical chart contained all fourteen key elements of ACP. Most frequently recorded ACP elements were: knowledge of illness, goals of treatment and care and fears and concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of structural implementation of ACP in the care for patients with interstitial lung disease, results in only some elements of ACP being dialogued by health care professionals (HCP). These notes recorded are often superficial and reflect the view of the HCP. Implementation of ACP conversations and structured documentation is needed to gain better insight into the wishes and preferences of the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091241267914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241267914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (IPF/PPF) of known cause are relatively rare lung diseases with a limited survival time after diagnosis. Conscious attention for palliative care is recommended. Optimal care requires collaboration to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care with the patient and their families, to inform (or enable) Advance Care Planning (ACP).

Objective: To get insight into the frequency of key elements of ACP described after dialogues with patients with IPF/PPF.

Methods: A retrospective audit included charts of patients with IPF/PPF who died between December 2017 and December 2020. A data extraction model was developed based on a guideline for patient federation and wider literature and finally consisted of fourteen key elements. Subsequently content analysis was performed.

Results: The medical charts of 60 patients showed that an element of ACP was recorded in 57(95%) of cases. No medical chart contained all fourteen key elements of ACP. Most frequently recorded ACP elements were: knowledge of illness, goals of treatment and care and fears and concerns.

Conclusion: The lack of structural implementation of ACP in the care for patients with interstitial lung disease, results in only some elements of ACP being dialogued by health care professionals (HCP). These notes recorded are often superficial and reflect the view of the HCP. Implementation of ACP conversations and structured documentation is needed to gain better insight into the wishes and preferences of the patient.

预先护理计划:国家间质性肺病转诊中心的回顾性审计。
背景:已知病因的特发性和进行性肺纤维化(IPF/PPF)是相对罕见的肺部疾病,确诊后存活时间有限。建议有意识地关注姑息治疗。最佳护理需要与患者及其家属合作,确定未来医疗和护理的目标和偏好,为预先护理计划(ACP)提供信息(或使其成为可能):目的:了解与 IPF/PPF 患者对话后所描述的 ACP 关键要素的频率:回顾性审计包括2017年12月至2020年12月期间死亡的IPF/PPF患者的病历。根据患者联合会指南和更广泛的文献资料开发了一个数据提取模型,最终由 14 个关键要素组成。随后进行了内容分析:60 名患者的病历显示,57 例(95%)病例记录了 ACP 要素。没有一份病历包含 ACP 的全部 14 个关键要素。最常记录的 ACP 要素是:疾病知识、治疗和护理目标以及恐惧和担忧:结论:在对间质性肺病患者的护理中,缺乏对 ACP 的结构性实施,导致医护人员(HCP)只对 ACP 的部分要素进行了对话。这些记录往往是肤浅的,反映了医护人员的观点。要更好地了解患者的意愿和偏好,就需要实施 ACP 对话和结构化记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信