The ventilatory efficiency parameters outperform peak oxygen consumption in monitoring the therapy effects in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Stefan Seman, Milorad Tesic, Marija Babic, Lidija Mikic, Lazar Velicki, Nduka C Okwose, Sarah J Charman, Maria Tafelmeier, Iacopo Olivotto, Nenad Filipovic, Arsen Ristic, Ross Arena, Marco Guazzi, Djordje Jakovljevic, Thomas G Allison, Dejana Popovic
{"title":"The ventilatory efficiency parameters outperform peak oxygen consumption in monitoring the therapy effects in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Stefan Seman, Milorad Tesic, Marija Babic, Lidija Mikic, Lazar Velicki, Nduka C Okwose, Sarah J Charman, Maria Tafelmeier, Iacopo Olivotto, Nenad Filipovic, Arsen Ristic, Ross Arena, Marco Guazzi, Djordje Jakovljevic, Thomas G Allison, Dejana Popovic","doi":"10.1016/j.pcad.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameter that most accurately reflected therapeutic efficacy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Well-being questionnaire, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide measurements, echocardiography, and CPET were performed in patients with symptomatic non-obstructive HCM during phase II, randomized, open-label multicentre study, before and after 16 weeks of traditional or sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Patients were followed 36 months after the initial CPET. Primary endpoints were changes in: 1) peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>); 2) VO<sub>2</sub> at anaerobic threshold (AT); 3) oxygen pulse; 4) minute ventilation (VE)/carbon-dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) production slope; 5) VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> at AT (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>_AT); 6) VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> nadir; 7) VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> intercept; and 8) partial end-tidal pressure of carbon-dioxide (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) change during CPET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 115 screened patients, 61 (52 ± 14 years, 43 % women) were included. Within subject therapy effects were detected only by the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> intercept and P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> change, whereas the differences between medical regimens were detected by differences in VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> nadir and VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>_AT changes after the treatment. The best predictors of the change in well-being were left ventricular outflow tract maximal gradient and VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> intercept (B = 0.41,0.36; SE = 0.16,0.30; CI = 0.14-0.79, 0.15-1.14; p = 0.006,0.016, respectively). Adverse cardiac events were best predicted by the initial VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> nadir.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ventilatory efficiency parameters outperform peak VO<sub>2</sub> in gauging therapy effects in patients with HCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94178,"journal":{"name":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2024.10.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We sought the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameter that most accurately reflected therapeutic efficacy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods: Well-being questionnaire, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide measurements, echocardiography, and CPET were performed in patients with symptomatic non-obstructive HCM during phase II, randomized, open-label multicentre study, before and after 16 weeks of traditional or sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Patients were followed 36 months after the initial CPET. Primary endpoints were changes in: 1) peak oxygen consumption (VO2); 2) VO2 at anaerobic threshold (AT); 3) oxygen pulse; 4) minute ventilation (VE)/carbon-dioxide (CO2) production slope; 5) VE/VCO2 at AT (VE/VCO2_AT); 6) VE/VCO2 nadir; 7) VE/VCO2 intercept; and 8) partial end-tidal pressure of carbon-dioxide (PETCO2) change during CPET.

Results: Of 115 screened patients, 61 (52 ± 14 years, 43 % women) were included. Within subject therapy effects were detected only by the VE/VCO2 intercept and PETCO2 change, whereas the differences between medical regimens were detected by differences in VE/VCO2 nadir and VE/VCO2_AT changes after the treatment. The best predictors of the change in well-being were left ventricular outflow tract maximal gradient and VE/VCO2 intercept (B = 0.41,0.36; SE = 0.16,0.30; CI = 0.14-0.79, 0.15-1.14; p = 0.006,0.016, respectively). Adverse cardiac events were best predicted by the initial VE/VCO2 nadir.

Conclusion: Ventilatory efficiency parameters outperform peak VO2 in gauging therapy effects in patients with HCM.

在监测肥厚型心肌病患者的治疗效果方面,通气效率参数优于峰值耗氧量。
目的:我们寻找能最准确反映肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者疗效的心肺运动测试(CPET)参数:在 II 期随机、开放标签多中心研究中,对有症状的非梗阻性 HCM 患者在接受传统治疗或沙库比曲利/缬沙坦治疗 16 周前后进行了健康问卷调查、N 端脑钠肽测量、超声心动图和 CPET。在首次 CPET 治疗 36 个月后对患者进行随访。主要终点是以下指标的变化1)峰值耗氧量(VO2);2)无氧阈值(AT)时的 VO2;3)氧脉搏;4)分钟通气量(VE)/二氧化碳(CO2)产生斜率;5)AT 时的 VE/VCO2(VE/VCO2_AT);6)VE/VCO2 最低值;7)VE/VCO2 截距;8)CPET 期间二氧化碳部分潮气末压(PETCO2)的变化:结果:在 115 名接受筛查的患者中,61 人(52 ± 14 岁,43% 为女性)入选。仅通过 VE/VCO2 截距和 PETCO2 变化来检测受试者内部的治疗效果,而通过治疗后 VE/VCO2 nadir 和 VE/VCO2_AT 变化的差异来检测医疗方案之间的差异。左心室流出道最大阶差和 VE/VCO2 截距(B = 0.41,0.36;SE = 0.16,0.30;CI = 0.14-0.79,0.15-1.14;P = 0.006,0.016)是预测健康状况变化的最佳指标。初始 VE/VCO2 最低值对不良心脏事件的预测效果最佳:结论:在衡量 HCM 患者的治疗效果方面,通气效率参数优于峰值 VO2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信