Understanding primary care provider's knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support.

Christina J Dietz, Emily Doherty, John Emerson, Karen Kemper, Lior Rennert, Windsor Westbrook Sherrill
{"title":"Understanding primary care provider's knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support.","authors":"Christina J Dietz, Emily Doherty, John Emerson, Karen Kemper, Lior Rennert, Windsor Westbrook Sherrill","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The American Diabetes Association Standards of Care recommends that individuals with diabetes receive self-management education, but the utilization of these services remains low. This study explores primary care providers' knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A convergent mixed methods study design grounded in the Theoretical Domains Framework was conducted with an initial provider survey, followed by semi-structured interview of a purposeful sub-sample of providers. The survey was distributed via REDCap and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 PCP's responded to the survey (response rate 37.63 %) and 17 participated in interviews. The average knowledge score of the correct selection of DSMES referral time points was 70.35 %. Five themes emerged in provider interviews: procedural knowledge, ability, beliefs, reinforcement, and cultural norms. Providers wanted bidirectional communication with the DSMES program and were more likely to refer if they had a cultural norm of referring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providers have limited knowledge of the appropriate time to refer to DSMES but expressed a willingness to refer. They emphasized the importance of providing their patients with appropriate self-management education and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The American Diabetes Association Standards of Care recommends that individuals with diabetes receive self-management education, but the utilization of these services remains low. This study explores primary care providers' knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES).

Study design: A convergent mixed methods study design grounded in the Theoretical Domains Framework was conducted with an initial provider survey, followed by semi-structured interview of a purposeful sub-sample of providers. The survey was distributed via REDCap and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Results: A total of 140 PCP's responded to the survey (response rate 37.63 %) and 17 participated in interviews. The average knowledge score of the correct selection of DSMES referral time points was 70.35 %. Five themes emerged in provider interviews: procedural knowledge, ability, beliefs, reinforcement, and cultural norms. Providers wanted bidirectional communication with the DSMES program and were more likely to refer if they had a cultural norm of referring.

Conclusion: Providers have limited knowledge of the appropriate time to refer to DSMES but expressed a willingness to refer. They emphasized the importance of providing their patients with appropriate self-management education and support.

了解初级保健提供者对糖尿病自我管理教育和支持的了解和看法。
目的:美国糖尿病协会护理标准》建议糖尿病患者接受自我管理教育,但这些服务的利用率仍然很低。本研究探讨了初级保健提供者对糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)的认识和看法:研究设计:本研究以理论领域框架为基础,采用聚合混合方法进行研究设计,首先对医疗服务提供者进行调查,然后对特定的医疗服务提供者子样本进行半结构化访谈。调查表通过 REDCap 发布,访谈内容逐字记录和转录:共有 140 名初级保健医生回复了调查(回复率为 37.63%),17 人参加了访谈。正确选择 DSMES 转诊时间点的平均知识得分率为 70.35%。在与医疗服务提供者的访谈中出现了五个主题:程序性知识、能力、信念、强化和文化规范。医疗服务提供者希望与 DSMES 项目进行双向交流,如果他们有转介的文化规范,则更有可能进行转介:医疗服务提供者对转介到 DSMES 的适当时间了解有限,但表示愿意转介。他们强调了为患者提供适当的自我管理教育和支持的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信