Psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the diabetes empowerment scale, long and short form, among the slovenian adults with type 2 diabetes.

Tina Virtič Potočnik, Špela Miroševič, Matic Mihevc, Črt Zavrnik, Majda Mori Lukančič, Tonka Poplas Susič, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the diabetes empowerment scale, long and short form, among the slovenian adults with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Tina Virtič Potočnik, Špela Miroševič, Matic Mihevc, Črt Zavrnik, Majda Mori Lukančič, Tonka Poplas Susič, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES), both the long form (S-DES-LF) and the short form (S-DES-SF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April and September 2023, we recruited adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using convenient sampling in five primary health centres. We examined internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the fit of the one-and three-factor models for S-DES-SF and S-DES-LF, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of 288 individuals, with a mean age of 67 ± 9.2 years, including 132 men and 156 women, showed excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability for both the S-DES-LF (Cronbach's α=0.90; ICC=0.95) and S-DES-SF (α=0.91; ICC=0.92). Criterion validity of the S-DES-LF was confirmed through known-groups validity, with higher education (p=0.016) and absence of comorbid hypertension (p=0.034) associated with greater empowerment. Discriminant validity was demonstrated by the lack of significant correlations between the S-DES-LF and S-DES-SF scores with age or gender. CFA confirmed a good fit for the S-DES-SF's one-factor model but not for S-DES-LF three-factor model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S-DES-LF and S-DES-SF are valid and reliable tools for assessing diabetes empowerment in Slovenian people with T2D. Future research should further explore the convergent validity of scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To determine the psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES), both the long form (S-DES-LF) and the short form (S-DES-SF).

Methods: Between April and September 2023, we recruited adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using convenient sampling in five primary health centres. We examined internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the fit of the one-and three-factor models for S-DES-SF and S-DES-LF, respectively.

Results: The results of 288 individuals, with a mean age of 67 ± 9.2 years, including 132 men and 156 women, showed excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability for both the S-DES-LF (Cronbach's α=0.90; ICC=0.95) and S-DES-SF (α=0.91; ICC=0.92). Criterion validity of the S-DES-LF was confirmed through known-groups validity, with higher education (p=0.016) and absence of comorbid hypertension (p=0.034) associated with greater empowerment. Discriminant validity was demonstrated by the lack of significant correlations between the S-DES-LF and S-DES-SF scores with age or gender. CFA confirmed a good fit for the S-DES-SF's one-factor model but not for S-DES-LF three-factor model.

Conclusions: S-DES-LF and S-DES-SF are valid and reliable tools for assessing diabetes empowerment in Slovenian people with T2D. Future research should further explore the convergent validity of scales.

斯洛文尼亚成人 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病赋权量表(长表和短表)的心理计量特性。
目的:确定斯洛文尼亚版糖尿病赋权量表(DES)长表(S-DES-LF)和短表(S-DES-SF)的心理测量特性:方法:2023 年 4 月至 9 月期间,我们在五个初级保健中心采用方便抽样的方式招募了 2 型糖尿病(T2D)成人患者。我们研究了内部一致性、重测可靠性、标准效度和判别效度。确认性因子分析(CFA)分别评估了S-DES-SF和S-DES-LF的单因子模型和三因子模型的拟合情况:结果显示,S-DES-LF(Cronbach's α=0.90;ICC=0.95)和 S-DES-SF(α=0.91;ICC=0.92)的内部一致性极佳,测试-再测信度也很高。S-DES-LF的标准有效性通过已知组的有效性得到了证实,教育程度较高(p=0.016)和无合并高血压(p=0.034)与增强能力相关。S-DES-LF和S-DES-SF得分与年龄或性别之间没有明显的相关性,这证明了区分有效性。CFA证实S-DES-SF的单因素模型拟合良好,但S-DES-LF的三因素模型拟合不佳:结论:S-DES-LF 和 S-DES-SF 是评估斯洛文尼亚 T2D 患者糖尿病能力的有效、可靠工具。未来的研究应进一步探讨量表的收敛效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信