Complex Exercises Improve Cognition in People With Parkinson's Disease and Freezing of Gait.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1177/15459683241290793
Carla Silva-Batista, Filipe Oliveira de Almeida, Alana Batista, Egberto Reis Barbosa, Fay B Horak, Carlos Ugrinowitsch
{"title":"Complex Exercises Improve Cognition in People With Parkinson's Disease and Freezing of Gait.","authors":"Carla Silva-Batista, Filipe Oliveira de Almeida, Alana Batista, Egberto Reis Barbosa, Fay B Horak, Carlos Ugrinowitsch","doi":"10.1177/15459683241290793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence has suggested that cognitive decline may be a risk factor for freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Complex and challenging exercises have been suggested as potential rehabilitation strategies to decrease FOG severity and improve cognition; however, it is unknown whether improvement in cognition would explain decreased FOG severity following exercise.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this secondary analysis, we evaluated the effects of the adapted resistance training with instability (ARTI-complex and challenging exercises) compared with traditional motor rehabilitation (TMR-without challenging exercises) on cognitive function in people with FOG of PD. We also verified whether cognitive improvement explains the decrease in FOG previously published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to either the experimental group (ARTI, n = 17) or the active control group (TMR, n = 15). Both training groups exercised 3 times a week for 12 weeks (80-90 minute each session). FOG severity (FOG ratio from inertial sensors during a 360° turning-in-place task), frontal lobe function (Frontal Assessment Battery [FAB]), global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]), and attention and psychomotor speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) were evaluated before and after interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only the ARTI group improved FAB, MoCA, and DSST scores at posttraining. In addition, ARTI was more effective than TMR in improving FAB scores at posttraining. The changes in FAB scores explained the changes in FOG ratio following ARTI (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .43, <i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study suggests that ARTI, a complex and challenging training, improves cognition in people with FOG of PD. Improvements in frontal lobe function with ARTI help explain decreased FOG severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241290793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence has suggested that cognitive decline may be a risk factor for freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Complex and challenging exercises have been suggested as potential rehabilitation strategies to decrease FOG severity and improve cognition; however, it is unknown whether improvement in cognition would explain decreased FOG severity following exercise.

Objective: In this secondary analysis, we evaluated the effects of the adapted resistance training with instability (ARTI-complex and challenging exercises) compared with traditional motor rehabilitation (TMR-without challenging exercises) on cognitive function in people with FOG of PD. We also verified whether cognitive improvement explains the decrease in FOG previously published.

Methods: Participants were randomized to either the experimental group (ARTI, n = 17) or the active control group (TMR, n = 15). Both training groups exercised 3 times a week for 12 weeks (80-90 minute each session). FOG severity (FOG ratio from inertial sensors during a 360° turning-in-place task), frontal lobe function (Frontal Assessment Battery [FAB]), global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]), and attention and psychomotor speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) were evaluated before and after interventions.

Results: Only the ARTI group improved FAB, MoCA, and DSST scores at posttraining. In addition, ARTI was more effective than TMR in improving FAB scores at posttraining. The changes in FAB scores explained the changes in FOG ratio following ARTI (R2 = .43, P < .01).

Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that ARTI, a complex and challenging training, improves cognition in people with FOG of PD. Improvements in frontal lobe function with ARTI help explain decreased FOG severity.

复杂运动可改善帕金森病和步态冻结患者的认知能力
背景:有证据表明,认知能力下降可能是帕金森病(PD)患者步态冻结(FOG)的一个风险因素。复杂且具有挑战性的运动被认为是降低冻结步态严重程度和改善认知能力的潜在康复策略;然而,认知能力的改善能否解释运动后冻结步态严重程度的降低,目前尚不得而知:在这项二次分析中,我们评估了与传统运动康复(TMR-无挑战性运动)相比,具有不稳定性的适应性阻力训练(ARTI-复杂和挑战性运动)对帕金森病 FOG 患者认知功能的影响。我们还验证了认知功能的改善是否可以解释之前公布的 FOG 下降情况:参与者被随机分配到实验组(ARTI,n = 17)或积极对照组(TMR,n = 15)。两个训练组均每周锻炼 3 次,为期 12 周(每次 80-90 分钟)。对干预前后的 FOG 严重程度(在原地 360° 转动任务中通过惯性传感器获得的 FOG 比率)、额叶功能(额叶评估电池 [FAB])、整体认知能力(蒙特利尔认知评估 [MoCA])以及注意力和精神运动速度(数字符号替换测试 [DSST])进行评估:结果:只有 ARTI 组在训练后提高了 FAB、MoCA 和 DSST 分数。此外,在提高培训后的 FAB 分数方面,ARTI 比 TMR 更有效。FAB 评分的变化可以解释 ARTI 后 FOG 比率的变化(R2 = .43,P 结论:ARTI 组的 FOG 比率比 TMR 组高:这项试验性研究表明,ARTI 是一种复杂且具有挑战性的训练,可改善帕金森病 FOG 患者的认知能力。ARTI 对额叶功能的改善有助于解释 FOG 严重程度下降的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信