Diagnosis of Bruxism in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Hina Zafar Raja, Muhammad Nasir Saleem, Maryam Mumtaz, Fizza Tahir, Muhammad Usman Iqbal, Alina Naeem
{"title":"Diagnosis of Bruxism in Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hina Zafar Raja, Muhammad Nasir Saleem, Maryam Mumtaz, Fizza Tahir, Muhammad Usman Iqbal, Alina Naeem","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.10.1221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bruxism is a centrally mediated neurological para-functional movement disorder encompassing clenching, and grinding of teeth, or thrusting and bracing of mandible, which may be performed without conscious awareness. Diagnosis of bruxism can be done with instrumental and non-instrumental tools. Non-instrumental tools include self-reporting, questionnaires, history, and clinical diagnostic criteria. Instrumental tools include the use of intra-oral bite appliances, electromyography, and polysomnography. Polysomnography is considered as the gold standard to diagnose bruxism requiring the presence of special equipment and / or access to a sleep laboratory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence available for the validity (ability to identify those who have the disease versus those who do not) of non-instrumental tools in the diagnosis of bruxism. The research question for this study was whether non-instrumental tools are sufficient for confirmatory diagnosis of bruxism. PICO was described as 'P'opulation = adults, 'I'ntervention = diagnostic tools, 'Comparison' = non-instrumental tools compared with instrumental tools, and 'O'utcome as results of the intervention. The study was conducted from May 2020 to November 2021. Out of 3,687 reviewed articles, eight articles were selected for final review and reviewed for quality appraisal. It was found that non-instrumental tools or questionnaires are not sufficient for confirmatory diagnosing of bruxism independently. Correlating instrumental recordings with non-instrumental tools such as clinical findings may be a good practice to diagnose bruxism definitely and precisely. Key Words: Diagnosis, Bruxism, History, Electromyography, Polysomnography.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 10","pages":"1221-1228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.10.1221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bruxism is a centrally mediated neurological para-functional movement disorder encompassing clenching, and grinding of teeth, or thrusting and bracing of mandible, which may be performed without conscious awareness. Diagnosis of bruxism can be done with instrumental and non-instrumental tools. Non-instrumental tools include self-reporting, questionnaires, history, and clinical diagnostic criteria. Instrumental tools include the use of intra-oral bite appliances, electromyography, and polysomnography. Polysomnography is considered as the gold standard to diagnose bruxism requiring the presence of special equipment and / or access to a sleep laboratory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence available for the validity (ability to identify those who have the disease versus those who do not) of non-instrumental tools in the diagnosis of bruxism. The research question for this study was whether non-instrumental tools are sufficient for confirmatory diagnosis of bruxism. PICO was described as 'P'opulation = adults, 'I'ntervention = diagnostic tools, 'Comparison' = non-instrumental tools compared with instrumental tools, and 'O'utcome as results of the intervention. The study was conducted from May 2020 to November 2021. Out of 3,687 reviewed articles, eight articles were selected for final review and reviewed for quality appraisal. It was found that non-instrumental tools or questionnaires are not sufficient for confirmatory diagnosing of bruxism independently. Correlating instrumental recordings with non-instrumental tools such as clinical findings may be a good practice to diagnose bruxism definitely and precisely. Key Words: Diagnosis, Bruxism, History, Electromyography, Polysomnography.

成人磨牙症的诊断:系统回顾
磨牙症是一种由中枢神经介导的副功能性运动障碍,包括咬牙、磨牙或下颌前突和支撑,可能在无意识的情况下发生。磨牙症的诊断可通过仪器和非仪器工具进行。非仪器工具包括自我报告、问卷调查、病史和临床诊断标准。仪器工具包括使用口内咬合矫治器、肌电图和多导睡眠图。多导睡眠图被认为是诊断磨牙症的黄金标准,需要特殊的设备和/或进入睡眠实验室。本研究旨在评估非仪器工具在诊断磨牙症方面的有效性(识别患病者与非患病者的能力)。本研究的问题是非仪器工具是否足以确诊磨牙症。PICO 描述为 "P'opulation = 成人","I'ntervention = 诊断工具","Comparison" = 非仪器工具与仪器工具的比较,"O'utcome = 干预结果"。研究时间为 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 11 月。在 3,687 篇综述文章中,有 8 篇文章被选中进行终审和质量评估。研究发现,非仪器工具或问卷不足以独立确诊磨牙症。将器械记录与非器械工具(如临床发现)相关联,可能是确诊磨牙症的良好做法。关键字诊断 磨牙症 病史 肌电图 多导睡眠图
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信