Yoshito Kadoya, Mehmet Onur Omaygenc, Shahin Sean Abtahi, Shankavi Sritharan, Amal Nehmeh, Yeung Yam, Gary R. Small, Benjamin Chow
{"title":"Prognostic value of systolic left ventricular ejection fraction using prospective ECG-triggered cardiac CT","authors":"Yoshito Kadoya, Mehmet Onur Omaygenc, Shahin Sean Abtahi, Shankavi Sritharan, Amal Nehmeh, Yeung Yam, Gary R. Small, Benjamin Chow","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prospective ECG-triggered cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging limits the ability to assess left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). We previously developed a new index derived from LV volume changes over 100 ms during systole (LVEF<sub>100msec</sub>) as a surrogate of LV function in patients undergoing prospective ECG-triggered cardiac CT. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of LVEF<sub>100msec</sub>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing prospective systolic ECG-triggered cardiac CT were enrolled between January 2015 and September 2022. Each CT was analyzed for LVEF<sub>100msec</sub>. Area under the curve analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to define the best LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> cut-off and to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death/arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study enrolled 313 patients (median age = 58 years, male = 52.4 %). During a median follow-up of 924 (660–1365) days, 24 (7.7 %) patients had MACE. LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> was significantly lower in the MACE group compared to the non-MACE group (4.8 % vs. 8.3 %, p = 0.002). Optimal LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> cut-off for predicting MACE was 6.3 %. MACE-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> ≤6.3 % than those with >6.3 % (p < 0.001). LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> ≤6.3 % was an independent predictor of MACE, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.758 (95 % CI, 1.543–9.148; p = 0.004). The prognostic value of LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> was consistent across the various severities of coronary artery disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> was an independent predictor of adverse events. The implementation of LVEF<sub>100msec</sub> may improve the prognostic value of prospective ECG-triggered cardiac CT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1934592524004568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Prospective ECG-triggered cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging limits the ability to assess left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). We previously developed a new index derived from LV volume changes over 100 ms during systole (LVEF100msec) as a surrogate of LV function in patients undergoing prospective ECG-triggered cardiac CT. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of LVEF100msec.
Methods
Patients undergoing prospective systolic ECG-triggered cardiac CT were enrolled between January 2015 and September 2022. Each CT was analyzed for LVEF100msec. Area under the curve analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to define the best LVEF100msec cut-off and to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death/arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke.
Results
The study enrolled 313 patients (median age = 58 years, male = 52.4 %). During a median follow-up of 924 (660–1365) days, 24 (7.7 %) patients had MACE. LVEF100msec was significantly lower in the MACE group compared to the non-MACE group (4.8 % vs. 8.3 %, p = 0.002). Optimal LVEF100msec cut-off for predicting MACE was 6.3 %. MACE-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with LVEF100msec ≤6.3 % than those with >6.3 % (p < 0.001). LVEF100msec ≤6.3 % was an independent predictor of MACE, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.758 (95 % CI, 1.543–9.148; p = 0.004). The prognostic value of LVEF100msec was consistent across the various severities of coronary artery disease.
Conclusion
LVEF100msec was an independent predictor of adverse events. The implementation of LVEF100msec may improve the prognostic value of prospective ECG-triggered cardiac CT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography is a unique peer-review journal that integrates the entire international cardiovascular CT community including cardiologist and radiologists, from basic to clinical academic researchers, to private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our cardiovascular imaging community across the world. The goal of the journal is to advance the field of cardiovascular CT as the leading cardiovascular CT journal, attracting seminal work in the field with rapid and timely dissemination in electronic and print media.