Saquib Z Banday, Maniza Ayub, Malik T Rasool, Sheikh Z Ahmed, Aaqib Z Banday, Shah Naveed, Faisal R Guru, Mohmad H Mir, Shareefa Akhter, Mudasir H Bhat, Syed B Yaseen, Fir Afroz, Gull M Bhat, Mohammad M Lone, Shiekh A Aziz
{"title":"Receptor subtype and outcome of breast cancer - Single-center experience from North India.","authors":"Saquib Z Banday, Maniza Ayub, Malik T Rasool, Sheikh Z Ahmed, Aaqib Z Banday, Shah Naveed, Faisal R Guru, Mohmad H Mir, Shareefa Akhter, Mudasir H Bhat, Syed B Yaseen, Fir Afroz, Gull M Bhat, Mohammad M Lone, Shiekh A Aziz","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_56_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>In resource-limited settings, data regarding the impact of molecular/receptor subtypes on breast cancer (BC) are sparse. In this single-center retrospective study from north India, we analyze the outcomes of various molecular subtypes of BC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Females with biopsy-proven BC who were treated at our State Cancer Institute from 2014-2018 were included. Data regarding clinicopathological parameters and follow-up details were evaluated. For data analysis, cancers were categorized into 4 subtypes: HR+HER2-, HR+HER2+, HR-HER2+, and HR-HER2-.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 944 patients included, HR+HER2- (49.1%) and HR+HER2+ (13.1%) were the most and least common subtypes, respectively. The receptor subtype significantly impacted overall survival (OS). HR+HER2- cancers had the best outcomes while HR-HER2- cancers fared worst (3-yr OS of 94.3% and 69.1%, respectively). On subgroup analysis, the molecular subtype continued to significantly impact OS in patients with tumor grades II and III, disease stages II and III, and age groups of <40 and 40-60 years, respectively (HR-HER2- cancers had the lowest cumulative survival in each subgroup). In patients with metastatic BC, all molecular subtypes except HR+HER2- had a dismal prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall and across various subgroups, patients with triple-negative BC had the poorest outcomes. Ensuring optimal treatment utilization including affordable access to personalized tailored therapy is the need of the hour to improve long-term outcomes in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"20 5","pages":"1486-1493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_56_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims/objectives: In resource-limited settings, data regarding the impact of molecular/receptor subtypes on breast cancer (BC) are sparse. In this single-center retrospective study from north India, we analyze the outcomes of various molecular subtypes of BC.
Materials and methods: Females with biopsy-proven BC who were treated at our State Cancer Institute from 2014-2018 were included. Data regarding clinicopathological parameters and follow-up details were evaluated. For data analysis, cancers were categorized into 4 subtypes: HR+HER2-, HR+HER2+, HR-HER2+, and HR-HER2-.
Results: Among 944 patients included, HR+HER2- (49.1%) and HR+HER2+ (13.1%) were the most and least common subtypes, respectively. The receptor subtype significantly impacted overall survival (OS). HR+HER2- cancers had the best outcomes while HR-HER2- cancers fared worst (3-yr OS of 94.3% and 69.1%, respectively). On subgroup analysis, the molecular subtype continued to significantly impact OS in patients with tumor grades II and III, disease stages II and III, and age groups of <40 and 40-60 years, respectively (HR-HER2- cancers had the lowest cumulative survival in each subgroup). In patients with metastatic BC, all molecular subtypes except HR+HER2- had a dismal prognosis.
Conclusions: Overall and across various subgroups, patients with triple-negative BC had the poorest outcomes. Ensuring optimal treatment utilization including affordable access to personalized tailored therapy is the need of the hour to improve long-term outcomes in these patients.