Pattern of care and clinical outcome of patients with carcinoma endometrium and the impact of central histopathological review on management: A tertiary cancer centre experience.

Rakhi Verma, Ajeet K Gandhi, Madhup Rastogi, Vachaspati K Mishra, Vikas Sharma, Akash Agarwal, Saumya Shukla, Rohini Khurana, Rahat Hadi, Anoop K Srivastava, Nuzhat Husain
{"title":"Pattern of care and clinical outcome of patients with carcinoma endometrium and the impact of central histopathological review on management: A tertiary cancer centre experience.","authors":"Rakhi Verma, Ajeet K Gandhi, Madhup Rastogi, Vachaspati K Mishra, Vikas Sharma, Akash Agarwal, Saumya Shukla, Rohini Khurana, Rahat Hadi, Anoop K Srivastava, Nuzhat Husain","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1207_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the third most common gynecological malignancy in India. Recent PORTEC-3 analysis emphasized the role of central histopathological review. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the demographic and histopathological characteristics of EC patients treated at our institute and assess the impact of the central histopathological review on management and also analyze clinical outcomes in this cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data of 75 EC patients treated at our center between 2013 and 2022 were retrieved from our departmental archives. Patients were analyzed for demographic details, histopathological findings, details of surgery and histopathology (HPE), results of a review of HPE, adjuvant treatment details, and clinical outcomes. All patients with HPE outside of our institute were reviewed at our center prior to initiation of treatment. In cases of discordance, patients were discussed in the multidisciplinary tumor board for the final treatment decisions. Patients were staged as per International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2018.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median age was 57 years (range: 37-74 years). Twenty-seven patients with HPE reported from the outside center were reviewed at our institute and changes were observed in 26 patients (96.3%). HPE review changes were observed in terms of histological grade, histological type, myometrial invasion, and lymph node involvement in five (18.5%), three (11.1%), seven (25.9%), and three (42.8%), respectively. HPE review leads to changes in the management of 19/26 patients. Stage distribution was I: II: III in 48 (64%): 9 (13.3%): 18 (24%) patients, respectively. The median external beam radiotherapy dose was 50 Gray (range: 45-50.4 Gray at 1.8-2 Gray per fraction). The median brachytherapy dose for patients treated with brachytherapy alone was 7 Gray each for three sessions and in combination with EBRT was 6 Gray each in two sessions. At a median follow-up of 51 months (range: 6-116 months), seven (9.3%) patients developed distant metastasis, two (2.7%) patients had local plus distant metastasis, and two (2.7%) patients had local recurrence. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 3 years were 93.5% and 86.7%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EC patients treated at our center have excellent local control rates with a combination of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. The central histopathological review may result in changes impacting patient management and should be routinely done prior to initiation of treatment in EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"20 5","pages":"1557-1563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1207_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the third most common gynecological malignancy in India. Recent PORTEC-3 analysis emphasized the role of central histopathological review. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the demographic and histopathological characteristics of EC patients treated at our institute and assess the impact of the central histopathological review on management and also analyze clinical outcomes in this cohort of patients.

Materials and methods: Data of 75 EC patients treated at our center between 2013 and 2022 were retrieved from our departmental archives. Patients were analyzed for demographic details, histopathological findings, details of surgery and histopathology (HPE), results of a review of HPE, adjuvant treatment details, and clinical outcomes. All patients with HPE outside of our institute were reviewed at our center prior to initiation of treatment. In cases of discordance, patients were discussed in the multidisciplinary tumor board for the final treatment decisions. Patients were staged as per International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2018.

Result: The median age was 57 years (range: 37-74 years). Twenty-seven patients with HPE reported from the outside center were reviewed at our institute and changes were observed in 26 patients (96.3%). HPE review changes were observed in terms of histological grade, histological type, myometrial invasion, and lymph node involvement in five (18.5%), three (11.1%), seven (25.9%), and three (42.8%), respectively. HPE review leads to changes in the management of 19/26 patients. Stage distribution was I: II: III in 48 (64%): 9 (13.3%): 18 (24%) patients, respectively. The median external beam radiotherapy dose was 50 Gray (range: 45-50.4 Gray at 1.8-2 Gray per fraction). The median brachytherapy dose for patients treated with brachytherapy alone was 7 Gray each for three sessions and in combination with EBRT was 6 Gray each in two sessions. At a median follow-up of 51 months (range: 6-116 months), seven (9.3%) patients developed distant metastasis, two (2.7%) patients had local plus distant metastasis, and two (2.7%) patients had local recurrence. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 3 years were 93.5% and 86.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: EC patients treated at our center have excellent local control rates with a combination of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. The central histopathological review may result in changes impacting patient management and should be routinely done prior to initiation of treatment in EC.

子宫内膜癌患者的护理模式和临床结果以及中央组织病理学审查对管理的影响:三级癌症中心的经验。
目的/目标:子宫内膜癌(EC)是印度第三大最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤。最近的 PORTEC-3 分析强调了中央组织病理学审查的作用。我们旨在回顾性分析在我院接受治疗的子宫内膜癌患者的人口统计学和组织病理学特征,评估中央组织病理学审查对管理的影响,并分析该组患者的临床结果:从科室档案中检索了2013年至2022年间在本中心接受治疗的75例EC患者的数据。对患者的人口统计学细节、组织病理学结果、手术和组织病理学(HPE)细节、HPE复查结果、辅助治疗细节和临床结果进行了分析。所有在我院以外接受 HPE 治疗的患者在开始治疗前都在我院接受了复查。如果出现意见分歧,患者将在多学科肿瘤委员会进行讨论,以做出最终治疗决定。患者按照国际妇产科联盟2018年的标准进行分期:中位年龄为57岁(范围:37-74岁)。外院报告的 27 例 HPE 患者在本院进行了复查,观察到 26 例患者(96.3%)发生了变化。在组织学分级、组织学类型、子宫肌层浸润和淋巴结受累方面,分别有 5 例(18.5%)、3 例(11.1%)、7 例(25.9%)和 3 例(42.8%)患者的 HPE 复查结果发生了变化。HPE 复查导致 19/26 例患者的治疗方法发生改变。分期分布为 I:II:III:48 例(64%):9 (13.3%):18(24%)例患者的分期分布为 I:II:III。外照射放疗的中位剂量为50格雷(范围:45-50.4格雷,每分1.8-2格雷)。单纯近距离放射治疗患者的中位近距离放射治疗剂量为每次7格雷,共治疗三次;与EBRT联合治疗患者的中位近距离放射治疗剂量为每次6格雷,共治疗两次。在中位 51 个月(6-116 个月)的随访中,7 例(9.3%)患者出现远处转移,2 例(2.7%)患者出现局部加远处转移,2 例(2.7%)患者出现局部复发。3年的总生存率和无病生存率分别为93.5%和86.7%:结论:在本中心接受外照射放疗和近距离放疗联合治疗的EC患者的局部控制率非常高。中央组织病理学审查可能会导致影响患者管理的变化,因此应在开始治疗前对EC患者进行常规审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信