Detecting and managing cognitive impairment in cardiac patients: insights from qualitative interviews with nurses.

Emma Zhao, Jacqueline Bloomfield, Nicole Lowres, Robyn Gallagher
{"title":"Detecting and managing cognitive impairment in cardiac patients: insights from qualitative interviews with nurses.","authors":"Emma Zhao, Jacqueline Bloomfield, Nicole Lowres, Robyn Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2024.2415896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Cognitive impairment and cardiovascular disease often coexist, and nurses are ideally positioned to detect and manage cognitive impairment in cardiac patients.<i>Objectives:</i> This study explored nurses' perspectives on understanding, detecting, and acting on cognitive impairment in cardiac patients.<i>Design and Methods:</i> Using an exploratory descriptive design, nurses from acute and outpatient cardiac units were interviewed. Data were thematically analyzed.<i>Results:</i> Sixteen nurses were interviewed, working in acute cardiology (n=7), cardiothoracic and intensive care (n=4), and cardiac rehabilitation (n=5). Three themes emerged: (1) Cognitive screening was not routine, with no clear protocols on who, when, and how to screen; (2) Nurses had varying understanding of cognitive impairment, dementia, and delirium; (3) Nurses acted on suspected cognitive changes to ensure patient safety, including referrals and care modifications.<i>Conclusions:</i> Cognitive screening was inconsistent, with barriers, such as workload and lack of education. Guidelines for feasible screening across settings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93954,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary nurse","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2024.2415896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment and cardiovascular disease often coexist, and nurses are ideally positioned to detect and manage cognitive impairment in cardiac patients.Objectives: This study explored nurses' perspectives on understanding, detecting, and acting on cognitive impairment in cardiac patients.Design and Methods: Using an exploratory descriptive design, nurses from acute and outpatient cardiac units were interviewed. Data were thematically analyzed.Results: Sixteen nurses were interviewed, working in acute cardiology (n=7), cardiothoracic and intensive care (n=4), and cardiac rehabilitation (n=5). Three themes emerged: (1) Cognitive screening was not routine, with no clear protocols on who, when, and how to screen; (2) Nurses had varying understanding of cognitive impairment, dementia, and delirium; (3) Nurses acted on suspected cognitive changes to ensure patient safety, including referrals and care modifications.Conclusions: Cognitive screening was inconsistent, with barriers, such as workload and lack of education. Guidelines for feasible screening across settings are needed.

检测和管理心脏病患者的认知障碍:从对护士的定性访谈中获得的启示。
背景:认知功能障碍与心血管疾病往往同时存在,而护士是检测和管理心脏病患者认知功能障碍的理想人选:本研究探讨了护士对心脏病患者认知障碍的理解、检测和处理的观点:采用探索性描述设计,对急诊和门诊心脏科的护士进行了访谈。对数据进行了主题分析:结果:16 名护士接受了访谈,他们分别在急诊心脏科(7 人)、心胸外科和重症监护室(4 人)以及心脏康复科(5 人)工作。访谈中出现了三个主题:(1)认知筛查不是常规筛查,对筛查对象、筛查时间和筛查方式没有明确的规定;(2)护士对认知障碍、痴呆和谵妄的理解各不相同;(3)护士对可疑的认知变化采取行动以确保患者安全,包括转诊和护理调整:结论:认知筛查不一致,存在工作量和缺乏教育等障碍。需要制定在不同环境中进行可行筛查的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信