Pediatric emergency mental health presentations during early COVID-19: Comparing virtual and in-person presentations.

Joanna Stuart, Nicole Sheridan, Paula Cloutier, Sarah Reid, Sandy Tse, Wendy Spettigue, Clare Gray
{"title":"Pediatric emergency mental health presentations during early COVID-19: Comparing virtual and in-person presentations.","authors":"Joanna Stuart, Nicole Sheridan, Paula Cloutier, Sarah Reid, Sandy Tse, Wendy Spettigue, Clare Gray","doi":"10.1177/13591045241286562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Increased mental health (MH) needs during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of a novel pediatric Emergency Department Virtual Care (EDVC) service. Our study aimed to describe the pediatric MH patient population that used EDVC by comparing patient-specific factors of those who obtained services virtually to those seen in-person. <b>Method:</b> This retrospective chart review was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Eastern Ontario. Children and youth (aged 3-17) who received virtual or in-person emergency MH services from May to December 2020 were included. Patient demographics, clinical presentation details and disposition were compared between the virtual and in-person groups. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. <b>Results:</b> 1104 youth (96.1%) utilized the in-person ED for MH concerns; 45 (3.9%) used EDVC. In-person youth had a higher level of perceived risk (78.9% vs. 41.9%) and were more likely to present with concerns of depression, suicidal ideation, self-harm, or laceration (46.1% vs. 35.6%). Anxiety/situational crises or behavioural issues were more likely to present virtually. Eight patients (17.8%) were redirected to the ED from EDVC. <b>Conclusions:</b> Several patient-specific factors varied between youth seen in-person or virtually for MH concern. Study results can assist with the design and implementation of virtual MH care platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93938,"journal":{"name":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"13591045241286562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045241286562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Increased mental health (MH) needs during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of a novel pediatric Emergency Department Virtual Care (EDVC) service. Our study aimed to describe the pediatric MH patient population that used EDVC by comparing patient-specific factors of those who obtained services virtually to those seen in-person. Method: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a pediatric hospital in Eastern Ontario. Children and youth (aged 3-17) who received virtual or in-person emergency MH services from May to December 2020 were included. Patient demographics, clinical presentation details and disposition were compared between the virtual and in-person groups. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 1104 youth (96.1%) utilized the in-person ED for MH concerns; 45 (3.9%) used EDVC. In-person youth had a higher level of perceived risk (78.9% vs. 41.9%) and were more likely to present with concerns of depression, suicidal ideation, self-harm, or laceration (46.1% vs. 35.6%). Anxiety/situational crises or behavioural issues were more likely to present virtually. Eight patients (17.8%) were redirected to the ED from EDVC. Conclusions: Several patient-specific factors varied between youth seen in-person or virtually for MH concern. Study results can assist with the design and implementation of virtual MH care platforms.

COVID-19早期的儿科急诊心理健康讲座:比较虚拟演示和现场演示。
目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,心理健康(MH)需求的增加导致了新型儿科急诊科虚拟护理(EDVC)服务的实施。我们的研究旨在通过比较通过虚拟方式获得服务的患者与亲自就诊的患者的特定因素,来描述使用 EDVC 的儿科 MH 患者群体。方法:这项回顾性病历审查在安大略省东部的一家儿科医院进行。研究对象包括在 2020 年 5 月至 12 月期间接受过虚拟或面对面心理健康急诊服务的儿童和青少年(3-17 岁)。比较了虚拟组和面对面组的患者人口统计学特征、临床表现细节和处置情况。数据采用描述性统计进行分析。结果1104名青少年(96.1%)因精神健康问题使用了现场急诊室;45名青少年(3.9%)使用了虚拟急诊室。亲临现场的青少年感知到的风险水平更高(78.9% 对 41.9%),更有可能出现抑郁、自杀倾向、自残或撕裂等问题(46.1% 对 35.6%)。焦虑/情境危机或行为问题更有可能在无形中出现。有 8 名患者(17.8%)从 EDVC 转到了急诊室。结论:因精神健康问题而亲自就诊或通过虚拟方式就诊的青少年之间存在一些患者特异性因素。研究结果有助于虚拟心理健康护理平台的设计和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信