Comparative Analysis of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex) and Brolucizumab Injection in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Hyperreflective Intraretinal Dots: A Retrospective Study.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S484731
Somnath Chakraborty, Jay Umed Sheth
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex) and Brolucizumab Injection in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Hyperreflective Intraretinal Dots: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Somnath Chakraborty, Jay Umed Sheth","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S484731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (DEX) and Brolucizumab Injection in treating Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) with Hyperreflective Intraretinal Dots (HRID).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study in India included 40 eyes (20 per group) with controlled diabetes and HRID on optical coherence tomography. Patients received either DEX or Brolucizumab, with outcomes assessed at various intervals up to 24 weeks. Primary measures included Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), and safety parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatment groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics. Both treatments significantly improved the BCVA at weeks 4, 12, and 24, with the DEX implant showing significantly better results at week 12 than brolucizumab (<i>P</i>=0.04). In treatment-naïve eyes, BCVA improvements were similar across all time points. In recalcitrant DME eyes, DEX showed significant BCVA improvements at all time points, while brolucizumab showed significant improvements only at weeks 4 (<i>P</i>=0.005) and 24 (<i>P</i>=0.04). The CMT also improved with both treatments, with DEX showing superior reduction at weeks 4 (<i>P</i>=0.003), 12 (<i>P</i>=0.003), and 24 (<i>P</i>=0.002) respectively. In treatment-naïve eyes, DEX showed consistently better CMT reductions. In refractory DME eyes, both treatments significantly reduced CMT, with DEX performing better at week 12 (<i>P</i>=0.042). DEX required fewer injections (DEX: 1.5±0.61; brolucizumab: 2.4±0.82; <i>P</i>=0.0002) and less supplementary laser treatment (DEX:8/20, 40% eyes; brolucizumab: 16/20, 80%; <i>P</i>=0.01) compared to brolucizumab. No adverse events were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests the potential superiority of intravitreal DEX implant over brolucizumab in managing DME with HRID. DEX exhibited sustained positive responses in BCVA and CMT, requiring fewer injections and supplementary interventions. Future research should explore extended follow-up durations, personalized treatment strategies, and refined biomarkers to optimize DME management.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S484731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (DEX) and Brolucizumab Injection in treating Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) with Hyperreflective Intraretinal Dots (HRID).

Patients and methods: A single-center retrospective study in India included 40 eyes (20 per group) with controlled diabetes and HRID on optical coherence tomography. Patients received either DEX or Brolucizumab, with outcomes assessed at various intervals up to 24 weeks. Primary measures included Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), and safety parameters.

Results: Both treatment groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics. Both treatments significantly improved the BCVA at weeks 4, 12, and 24, with the DEX implant showing significantly better results at week 12 than brolucizumab (P=0.04). In treatment-naïve eyes, BCVA improvements were similar across all time points. In recalcitrant DME eyes, DEX showed significant BCVA improvements at all time points, while brolucizumab showed significant improvements only at weeks 4 (P=0.005) and 24 (P=0.04). The CMT also improved with both treatments, with DEX showing superior reduction at weeks 4 (P=0.003), 12 (P=0.003), and 24 (P=0.002) respectively. In treatment-naïve eyes, DEX showed consistently better CMT reductions. In refractory DME eyes, both treatments significantly reduced CMT, with DEX performing better at week 12 (P=0.042). DEX required fewer injections (DEX: 1.5±0.61; brolucizumab: 2.4±0.82; P=0.0002) and less supplementary laser treatment (DEX:8/20, 40% eyes; brolucizumab: 16/20, 80%; P=0.01) compared to brolucizumab. No adverse events were observed in either group.

Conclusion: The study suggests the potential superiority of intravitreal DEX implant over brolucizumab in managing DME with HRID. DEX exhibited sustained positive responses in BCVA and CMT, requiring fewer injections and supplementary interventions. Future research should explore extended follow-up durations, personalized treatment strategies, and refined biomarkers to optimize DME management.

玻璃体内地塞米松植入剂(Ozurdex)与布鲁珠单抗注射液治疗伴有高反光视网膜内点的糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较分析:一项回顾性研究。
目的:这项回顾性研究旨在比较玻璃体内地塞米松植入剂(DEX)和布鲁珠单抗注射液治疗伴有高反光性视网膜内点(HRID)的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效和安全性:在印度进行的一项单中心回顾性研究共纳入了40只眼睛(每组20只),这些患者的糖尿病得到了控制,并通过光学相干断层扫描检查出了HRID。患者接受 DEX 或 Brolucizumab 治疗,并在 24 周内的不同时间间隔进行疗效评估。主要评估指标包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心厚度(CMT)和安全性参数:结果:两个治疗组的基线特征相当。在第4、12和24周时,两种治疗方法都能明显改善BCVA,其中DEX植入剂在第12周时的效果明显优于brolucizumab(P=0.04)。在治疗无效的眼球中,所有时间点的BCVA改善情况相似。在难治性 DME 眼中,DEX 在所有时间点的 BCVA 均有显著改善,而布卢单抗仅在第 4 周(P=0.005)和第 24 周(P=0.04)有显著改善。两种治疗方法的CMT也都有所改善,其中DEX在第4周(P=0.003)、第12周(P=0.003)和第24周(P=0.002)分别显示出更好的降低效果。在治疗无效的眼球中,DEX的CMT降低效果一直较好。在难治性 DME 眼睛中,两种治疗方法都能显著减少 CMT,其中 DEX 在第 12 周的疗效更好(P=0.042)。与博路单抗相比,DEX所需的注射次数更少(DEX:1.5±0.61;博路单抗:2.4±0.82;P=0.0002),所需的辅助激光治疗次数更少(DEX:8/20,40%的眼睛;博路单抗:16/20,80%;P=0.01)。两组患者均未出现不良反应:该研究表明,在治疗伴有HRID的DME时,玻璃体内DEX植入剂可能比布卢单抗更有优势。DEX在BCVA和CMT方面表现出持续的积极反应,需要的注射和辅助干预更少。未来的研究应探索延长随访时间、个性化治疗策略和完善生物标志物,以优化 DME 的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信