Christopher Lawrence, Mahla Radmard, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Akua A Amoah, Dhairya A Lakhani, Javad Azadi, Arjun Chanmugam, David M Yousem
{"title":"Relationship of Mechanism of Injury to Asymptomatic Cervical Spine Fractures in the Elderly.","authors":"Christopher Lawrence, Mahla Radmard, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Akua A Amoah, Dhairya A Lakhani, Javad Azadi, Arjun Chanmugam, David M Yousem","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Canadian Cervical Spine Rule, a clinical decision-making tool for patients post-trauma is often interpreted as recommending cervical spine computed tomography in patients ≥ 65 years old, who sustain a dangerous mechanism of injury, and/or have extremity paresthesias. We retrospectively reviewed 6 years' of emergency department cervical spine computed tomography reports to determine fracture rates in patients ≥ 65, symptomatic or not, who did and did not have a dangerous mechanism. Of those ≥ 65 years old, 240/13925 (1.72%) patients had cervical spine fractures. The fracture rate in asymptomatic patients ≥ 65 was 0.27%. The fracture rate in asymptomatic patients ≥ 65, who did not have a dangerous mechanism of injury was 0.15%. The rate of unstable fractures requiring surgery was 0.007%. The findings suggest that the algorithm to scan asymptomatic patients ≥ 65, and/or those ≥ 65 without a dangerous injury mechanism, should be revisited for appropriateness and overall value.ABBREVIATIONS: CCR = The Canadian Cervical Spine Rule; CSCT = cervical spine computed tomography; ED = emergency department; EMR = electronic medical record; MVC = motor vehicle collision.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Canadian Cervical Spine Rule, a clinical decision-making tool for patients post-trauma is often interpreted as recommending cervical spine computed tomography in patients ≥ 65 years old, who sustain a dangerous mechanism of injury, and/or have extremity paresthesias. We retrospectively reviewed 6 years' of emergency department cervical spine computed tomography reports to determine fracture rates in patients ≥ 65, symptomatic or not, who did and did not have a dangerous mechanism. Of those ≥ 65 years old, 240/13925 (1.72%) patients had cervical spine fractures. The fracture rate in asymptomatic patients ≥ 65 was 0.27%. The fracture rate in asymptomatic patients ≥ 65, who did not have a dangerous mechanism of injury was 0.15%. The rate of unstable fractures requiring surgery was 0.007%. The findings suggest that the algorithm to scan asymptomatic patients ≥ 65, and/or those ≥ 65 without a dangerous injury mechanism, should be revisited for appropriateness and overall value.ABBREVIATIONS: CCR = The Canadian Cervical Spine Rule; CSCT = cervical spine computed tomography; ED = emergency department; EMR = electronic medical record; MVC = motor vehicle collision.