Utilization of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Among Medicare Beneficiaries Newly Diagnosed With Diabetes in Arkansas, 12 Months Postdiagnosis (2015-2018).

Mandana Rezaeiahari, Mahip Acharya, Joseph Henske, Kelsey Owsley, Jodi Bodenhamer
{"title":"Utilization of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Among Medicare Beneficiaries Newly Diagnosed With Diabetes in Arkansas, 12 Months Postdiagnosis (2015-2018).","authors":"Mandana Rezaeiahari, Mahip Acharya, Joseph Henske, Kelsey Owsley, Jodi Bodenhamer","doi":"10.1177/26350106241285827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine the rate of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) utilization among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) populations with type 2 diabetes in Arkansas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database was used to identify Medicare FFS and MA beneficiaries diagnosed with type 2 diabetes from 2015 to 2018. Claims from 2013 to 2020 were analyzed to determine newly diagnosed individuals from 2015 to 2018. The criteria included 1 outpatient diabetes claim in the index year and at least 1 inpatient or outpatient claim in the 2 years following the initial claim. A total of 15 648 Medicare FFS individuals and 7520 MA individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified. The use of DSMES 1 year following the diagnosis dates for both Medicare FFS and MA populations was assessed. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to understand the factors associated with DSMES utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSMES utilization consistently remained lower in the MA population compared to Medicare FFS (2.3% vs 4.9%). The adjusted analysis indicated that factors such as older age, living in a rural area, belonging to a racial group other than White, and MA enrollment were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving DSMES.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DSMES utilization in Arkansas, where the prevalence of diabetes is higher than the national average, is notably low. There is a need for coordinated efforts at various levels to enhance access to DSMES.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":" ","pages":"510-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106241285827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the rate of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) utilization among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) populations with type 2 diabetes in Arkansas.

Methods: The Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database was used to identify Medicare FFS and MA beneficiaries diagnosed with type 2 diabetes from 2015 to 2018. Claims from 2013 to 2020 were analyzed to determine newly diagnosed individuals from 2015 to 2018. The criteria included 1 outpatient diabetes claim in the index year and at least 1 inpatient or outpatient claim in the 2 years following the initial claim. A total of 15 648 Medicare FFS individuals and 7520 MA individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified. The use of DSMES 1 year following the diagnosis dates for both Medicare FFS and MA populations was assessed. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to understand the factors associated with DSMES utilization.

Results: DSMES utilization consistently remained lower in the MA population compared to Medicare FFS (2.3% vs 4.9%). The adjusted analysis indicated that factors such as older age, living in a rural area, belonging to a racial group other than White, and MA enrollment were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving DSMES.

Conclusions: DSMES utilization in Arkansas, where the prevalence of diabetes is higher than the national average, is notably low. There is a need for coordinated efforts at various levels to enhance access to DSMES.

阿肯色州新诊断为糖尿病的医疗保险受益人在诊断后 12 个月(2015-2018 年)对糖尿病自我管理教育和支持的利用情况。
目的:本研究旨在确定阿肯色州 2 型糖尿病患者在医疗保险付费服务(FFS)和医疗保险优势(MA)人群中的糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)使用率:使用阿肯色州所有纳税人索赔数据库来识别 2015 年至 2018 年期间确诊为 2 型糖尿病的联邦医疗保险 FFS 和 MA 受益人。对 2013 年至 2020 年的索赔进行分析,以确定 2015 年至 2018 年新诊断的患者。标准包括指数年的 1 次糖尿病门诊索赔,以及首次索赔后 2 年内的至少 1 次住院或门诊索赔。共确定了 15 648 名新确诊 2 型糖尿病的联邦医疗保险 FFS 患者和 7 520 名医疗保险 MA 患者。对联邦医疗保险 FFS 和医疗补助人群在诊断日期后 1 年使用 DSMES 的情况进行了评估。我们进行了描述性统计和多元逻辑回归分析,以了解与 DSMES 使用率相关的因素:结果:与医疗保险全额报销人群(2.3% 对 4.9%)相比,医疗保险补助人群的 DSMES 使用率一直较低。调整后的分析表明,年龄较大、居住在农村地区、属于白人以外的种族群体以及加入医疗保险等因素与接受 DSMES 的可能性较低有关:结论:在糖尿病发病率高于全国平均水平的阿肯色州,DSMES 的使用率明显偏低。需要在各个层面协调努力,以提高 DSMES 的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信