Use of passively collected actigraphy data to detect individual depressive symptoms in a clinical subpopulation and a general population.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
George D Price, Amanda C Collins, Daniel M Mackin, Michael V Heinz, Nicholas C Jacobson
{"title":"Use of passively collected actigraphy data to detect individual depressive symptoms in a clinical subpopulation and a general population.","authors":"George D Price, Amanda C Collins, Daniel M Mackin, Michael V Heinz, Nicholas C Jacobson","doi":"10.1037/abn0000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presentation of major depressive disorder (MDD) can vary widely due to its heterogeneity, including inter- and intraindividual symptom variability, making MDD difficult to diagnose with standard measures in clinical settings. Prior work has demonstrated that passively collected actigraphy can be used to detect MDD at a disorder level; however, given the heterogeneous nature of MDD, comprising multiple distinct symptoms, it is important to measure the degree to which various MDD symptoms may be captured by such passive data. The current study investigated whether individual depressive symptoms could be detected from passively collected actigraphy data in a (a) clinical subpopulation (i.e., moderate depressive symptoms or greater) and (b) general population. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a large nationally representative sample (<i>N</i> = 8,378), we employed a convolutional neural network to determine which depressive symptoms in each population could be detected by wrist-worn, minute-level actigraphy data. Findings indicated a small-moderate correspondence between the predictions and observed outcomes for mood, psychomotor, and suicide items (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUCs] = 0.58-0.61); a moderate-large correspondence for anhedonia (AUC = 0.64); and a large correspondence for fatigue (AUC = 0.74) in the clinical subpopulation (<i>n</i> = 766); and a small-moderate correspondence for sleep, appetite, psychomotor, and suicide items (AUCs = 0.56-0.60) in the general population (<i>n</i> = 8,378). Thus, individual depressive symptoms can be detected in individuals who likely meet the criteria for MDD, suggesting that wrist-worn actigraphy may be suitable for passively assessing these symptoms, providing important clinical implications for the diagnosis and treatment of MDD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presentation of major depressive disorder (MDD) can vary widely due to its heterogeneity, including inter- and intraindividual symptom variability, making MDD difficult to diagnose with standard measures in clinical settings. Prior work has demonstrated that passively collected actigraphy can be used to detect MDD at a disorder level; however, given the heterogeneous nature of MDD, comprising multiple distinct symptoms, it is important to measure the degree to which various MDD symptoms may be captured by such passive data. The current study investigated whether individual depressive symptoms could be detected from passively collected actigraphy data in a (a) clinical subpopulation (i.e., moderate depressive symptoms or greater) and (b) general population. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a large nationally representative sample (N = 8,378), we employed a convolutional neural network to determine which depressive symptoms in each population could be detected by wrist-worn, minute-level actigraphy data. Findings indicated a small-moderate correspondence between the predictions and observed outcomes for mood, psychomotor, and suicide items (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUCs] = 0.58-0.61); a moderate-large correspondence for anhedonia (AUC = 0.64); and a large correspondence for fatigue (AUC = 0.74) in the clinical subpopulation (n = 766); and a small-moderate correspondence for sleep, appetite, psychomotor, and suicide items (AUCs = 0.56-0.60) in the general population (n = 8,378). Thus, individual depressive symptoms can be detected in individuals who likely meet the criteria for MDD, suggesting that wrist-worn actigraphy may be suitable for passively assessing these symptoms, providing important clinical implications for the diagnosis and treatment of MDD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

利用被动采集的动图数据检测临床亚人群和普通人群中的个人抑郁症状。
重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的表现因其异质性而千差万别,包括个体间和个体内的症状变异,这使得在临床环境中很难用标准方法诊断 MDD。先前的研究表明,被动采集的动电图可用于在障碍水平上检测 MDD;然而,鉴于 MDD 的异质性,包括多种不同的症状,因此测量此类被动数据在多大程度上可以捕捉到各种 MDD 症状非常重要。本研究调查了在 (a) 临床亚人群(即中度或更严重的抑郁症状)和 (b) 普通人群中,能否从被动采集的动图数据中检测出个体抑郁症状。利用具有全国代表性的大型抽样调查--美国国家健康与营养调查(N = 8378)的数据,我们采用卷积神经网络来确定每个人群中哪些抑郁症状可以通过腕戴式分钟级动电图数据检测出来。研究结果表明,在情绪、精神运动和自杀项目上,预测结果与观察结果之间存在中小幅度的对应关系(接收者操作特征曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.58-0.61);在厌世情绪上存在中大幅度的对应关系(AUC = 0.64);在临床亚群(n = 766)中,疲劳的对应关系较大(AUC = 0.74);在一般人群(n = 8378)中,睡眠、食欲、精神运动和自杀项目的对应关系为小-中等(AUC = 0.56-0.60)。因此,在可能符合多发性抑郁症标准的人群中可以检测到个别抑郁症状,这表明腕戴式行为记录仪可能适用于被动评估这些症状,为多发性抑郁症的诊断和治疗提供了重要的临床意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信