From patient classification to optimized treatment in ART: the AMPLITUDE Delphi consensus.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2024.1467322
Christophe Blockeel, Anne Guivarc'h-Leveque, Catherine Rongieres, Nelly Swierkowski-Blanchard, Géraldine Porcu-Buisson, Chadi Yazbeck, Christine Wyns
{"title":"From patient classification to optimized treatment in ART: the AMPLITUDE Delphi consensus.","authors":"Christophe Blockeel, Anne Guivarc'h-Leveque, Catherine Rongieres, Nelly Swierkowski-Blanchard, Géraldine Porcu-Buisson, Chadi Yazbeck, Christine Wyns","doi":"10.3389/frph.2024.1467322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A Delphi consensus was performed to evaluate expert opinions on the management of key aspects of ovarian stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Scientific Committee developed eleven statements for patient profiles corresponding to predicted ovarian responses (low, normal, and high) based on antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). The statements were distributed (online survey) to French and Belgian fertility specialists. Consensus was reached when ≥66.7% of participants agreed or disagreed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 respondents, a consensus agreement was reached for each patient profile for personalizing the initial dose of gonadotropin, taking age, weight, body mass index, nature of the cycle, and the decision to perform a fresh transfer or a freeze-all strategy into consideration. The respondents preferred a fresh transfer for low and normal responders and a freeze-all strategy in case of high risk of hyperstimulation, newly diagnosed uterine or tubal pathology and premature progesterone elevation. A consensus was reached for 10-15 oocytes as optimal oocyte target from the first round of voting. The panel agreed to increase the gonadotropin dose in case of insufficient response and preferred a GnRH antagonist protocol for a subsequent cycle in case of excessive response. Finally, a consensual answer was obtained for using LH/hCG activity in case of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, advanced age, inadequate response during first stimulation and suspected FSH receptor polymorphism.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The AMPLITUDE consensus supports the importance of optimizing the ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Additional studies could complete these findings and guide fertility specialists in their daily practice to improve ovarian stimulation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1467322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1467322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A Delphi consensus was performed to evaluate expert opinions on the management of key aspects of ovarian stimulation.

Methods: A Scientific Committee developed eleven statements for patient profiles corresponding to predicted ovarian responses (low, normal, and high) based on antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). The statements were distributed (online survey) to French and Belgian fertility specialists. Consensus was reached when ≥66.7% of participants agreed or disagreed.

Results: Among 52 respondents, a consensus agreement was reached for each patient profile for personalizing the initial dose of gonadotropin, taking age, weight, body mass index, nature of the cycle, and the decision to perform a fresh transfer or a freeze-all strategy into consideration. The respondents preferred a fresh transfer for low and normal responders and a freeze-all strategy in case of high risk of hyperstimulation, newly diagnosed uterine or tubal pathology and premature progesterone elevation. A consensus was reached for 10-15 oocytes as optimal oocyte target from the first round of voting. The panel agreed to increase the gonadotropin dose in case of insufficient response and preferred a GnRH antagonist protocol for a subsequent cycle in case of excessive response. Finally, a consensual answer was obtained for using LH/hCG activity in case of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, advanced age, inadequate response during first stimulation and suspected FSH receptor polymorphism.

Discussion: The AMPLITUDE consensus supports the importance of optimizing the ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Additional studies could complete these findings and guide fertility specialists in their daily practice to improve ovarian stimulation outcomes.

从 ART 患者分类到优化治疗:AMPLITUDE Delphi 共识。
引言方法:科学委员会根据前卵泡计数(AFC)和抗穆勒氏管激素(anti-Müllerian hormone),为预测卵巢反应(低、正常和高)的患者情况制定了十一项声明:科学委员会根据前卵泡计数(AFC)和抗穆勒氏管激素(AMH)预测的卵巢反应(低反应、正常反应和高反应),为患者的情况制定了十一项声明。这些声明已分发给法国和比利时的不孕症专家(在线调查)。当≥66.7%的参与者同意或不同意时,即达成共识:结果:在52名受访者中,就每个患者的情况达成了共识,即根据年龄、体重、体质指数、周期性质以及新鲜移植或冷冻策略的决定,个性化确定促性腺激素的初始剂量。对于低反应和正常反应者,受访者倾向于采用新鲜移植,而对于高刺激风险、新诊断的子宫或输卵管病变以及孕酮过早升高者,则倾向于采用全部冷冻策略。在第一轮投票中,大家一致同意将 10-15 个卵母细胞作为最佳卵母细胞目标。专家小组同意在反应不足的情况下增加促性腺激素的剂量,在反应过强的情况下,优先选择在下一个周期使用 GnRH 拮抗剂方案。最后,在促性腺激素功能减退症、高龄、首次刺激反应不足以及疑似 FSH 受体多态性的情况下,使用 LH/hCG 活性也获得了一致同意:AMPLITUDE共识支持对接受辅助生殖技术治疗的患者优化卵巢刺激方案的重要性。更多的研究可以完善这些发现,并指导生殖专家在日常工作中改善卵巢刺激的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信