What are the communication guidelines for people with dementia and their carers on the internet and are they evidence based? A systematic review.

Charlotte Harris, Rebeccah Webber, Gill Livingston, Suzanne Beeke
{"title":"What are the communication guidelines for people with dementia and their carers on the internet and are they evidence based? A systematic review.","authors":"Charlotte Harris, Rebeccah Webber, Gill Livingston, Suzanne Beeke","doi":"10.1177/14713012241292486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Communication difficulties of people with dementia can negatively impact well-being of them and their carers. There are evidence-based and clinically recommended strategies that can be used to support people with dementia which they are more likely to access on websites than via academic literature. We aimed to search the internet for communication advice for people with dementia and their carers, describe the strategies and compare these to the evidence-base.<b>Methods:</b> After a systematic search of websites offering communication advice to people with dementia and their carers, we described the strategies there, used reflexive thematic analysis to identify the rationale for recommended strategies and compared the strategies to the evidence base. We included websites aimed at people with dementia and their carers published by dementia-related health and social care, or third sector organisations. We compared strategies to those in published systematic reviews and practice guidance from UK health and social care agencies.<b>Results:</b> Our review identified 39 eligible websites, containing 164 individual strategies. These were grouped into 26 strategy types, with nine latent themes developed. These were supporting communication strengths, valuing the interaction, prioritising needs, providing emotional safety, working together, adapting communication for the situation, developing carer communication skills, knowing the individual and focusing on broader meaning.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our review highlights the need for flexible approaches to supporting communication for people with dementia which consider the individual's needs and preferences, the context of the interaction, and the priority in that moment. We identify the inherent challenges for carers in trying to interpret advice for their own needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012241292486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241292486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Communication difficulties of people with dementia can negatively impact well-being of them and their carers. There are evidence-based and clinically recommended strategies that can be used to support people with dementia which they are more likely to access on websites than via academic literature. We aimed to search the internet for communication advice for people with dementia and their carers, describe the strategies and compare these to the evidence-base.Methods: After a systematic search of websites offering communication advice to people with dementia and their carers, we described the strategies there, used reflexive thematic analysis to identify the rationale for recommended strategies and compared the strategies to the evidence base. We included websites aimed at people with dementia and their carers published by dementia-related health and social care, or third sector organisations. We compared strategies to those in published systematic reviews and practice guidance from UK health and social care agencies.Results: Our review identified 39 eligible websites, containing 164 individual strategies. These were grouped into 26 strategy types, with nine latent themes developed. These were supporting communication strengths, valuing the interaction, prioritising needs, providing emotional safety, working together, adapting communication for the situation, developing carer communication skills, knowing the individual and focusing on broader meaning.Conclusion: Our review highlights the need for flexible approaches to supporting communication for people with dementia which consider the individual's needs and preferences, the context of the interaction, and the priority in that moment. We identify the inherent challenges for carers in trying to interpret advice for their own needs.

互联网上针对痴呆症患者及其照护者的交流指南有哪些?系统回顾。
简介痴呆症患者的交流障碍会对他们及其照顾者的福祉产生负面影响。与学术文献相比,痴呆症患者更有可能从网站上获取以证据为基础的临床推荐策略。我们的目的是在互联网上搜索针对痴呆症患者及其照护者的沟通建议,描述这些策略,并将其与循证基础进行比较:在对为痴呆症患者及其照护者提供沟通建议的网站进行系统搜索后,我们对网站上的策略进行了描述,使用反思性主题分析法确定了推荐策略的理由,并将这些策略与证据基础进行了比较。我们收录了由痴呆症相关医疗和社会护理机构或第三部门组织发布的针对痴呆症患者及其照护者的网站。我们将这些策略与已发表的系统综述以及英国医疗和社会护理机构的实践指南中的策略进行了比较:我们的审查确定了 39 个符合条件的网站,其中包含 164 项单独的策略。这些策略被分为 26 个策略类型,并形成了九个潜在主题。这些主题分别是:支持沟通优势、重视互动、优先考虑需求、提供情感安全、共同努力、根据情况调整沟通方式、发展照顾者的沟通技能、了解个人以及关注更广泛的意义:我们的综述强调,需要采取灵活的方法来支持痴呆症患者的沟通,这些方法应考虑到个人的需求和偏好、互动的背景以及当时的优先事项。我们发现了照顾者在尝试根据自身需求解释建议时所面临的固有挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信