Delay discounting of rewards and losses, alcohol use, and the influence of socioeconomic factors: A cross-sectional online study in frequent drinkers.

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Mathieu Pinger, Malin Skirke, Janine Thome, Wolfgang H Sommer, Georgia Koppe, Peter Kirsch
{"title":"Delay discounting of rewards and losses, alcohol use, and the influence of socioeconomic factors: A cross-sectional online study in frequent drinkers.","authors":"Mathieu Pinger, Malin Skirke, Janine Thome, Wolfgang H Sommer, Georgia Koppe, Peter Kirsch","doi":"10.1111/acer.15469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delay discounting describes the devaluation of future outcomes over time and is a popular behavioral construct in addiction research. Prior studies show modest yet consistent associations between problematic alcohol use and delayed reward discounting (DRD). However, the potential confounding influence of socioeconomic status (SES, e.g., income and education) is rarely addressed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the robustness of DRD as a predictor of alcohol use after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic variables. Additionally, we aimed to test the association between delayed loss discounting (DLD) and alcohol use in a sufficiently large sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from 341 moderate-to-heavy-drinking participants (27.92 ± 21.12 g alcohol/day, 43.48 ± 11.90 years old, 49.9% female, UK residents) in a cross-sectional online study. DRD and DLD were measured using an intertemporal choice task. Questionnaires encompassed alcohol use (AUDIT, weekly alcohol consumption), education and income, subjective measures of past and present socioeconomic status, and impulsivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DRD, but not DLD, was significantly associated with AUDIT scores (r = 0.15) and weekly alcohol consumption (r = 0.12). DRD remained a significant yet weak predictor of AUDIT scores when controlling for education and income, but not when controlling for education and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We replicated a small but robust association between alcohol use and DRD, but not DLD. This association appeared to be confounded by education and age, but not by income. We conclude that socioeconomic and demographic variables should systematically be accounted for in future studies investigating DRD and alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delay discounting describes the devaluation of future outcomes over time and is a popular behavioral construct in addiction research. Prior studies show modest yet consistent associations between problematic alcohol use and delayed reward discounting (DRD). However, the potential confounding influence of socioeconomic status (SES, e.g., income and education) is rarely addressed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the robustness of DRD as a predictor of alcohol use after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic variables. Additionally, we aimed to test the association between delayed loss discounting (DLD) and alcohol use in a sufficiently large sample.

Methods: We collected data from 341 moderate-to-heavy-drinking participants (27.92 ± 21.12 g alcohol/day, 43.48 ± 11.90 years old, 49.9% female, UK residents) in a cross-sectional online study. DRD and DLD were measured using an intertemporal choice task. Questionnaires encompassed alcohol use (AUDIT, weekly alcohol consumption), education and income, subjective measures of past and present socioeconomic status, and impulsivity.

Results: DRD, but not DLD, was significantly associated with AUDIT scores (r = 0.15) and weekly alcohol consumption (r = 0.12). DRD remained a significant yet weak predictor of AUDIT scores when controlling for education and income, but not when controlling for education and age.

Conclusions: We replicated a small but robust association between alcohol use and DRD, but not DLD. This association appeared to be confounded by education and age, but not by income. We conclude that socioeconomic and demographic variables should systematically be accounted for in future studies investigating DRD and alcohol use.

奖励和损失的延迟贴现、饮酒以及社会经济因素的影响:一项针对经常饮酒者的横断面在线研究。
背景:延迟折现描述的是随着时间的推移对未来结果的贬值,是成瘾研究中一个流行的行为结构。先前的研究表明,问题性饮酒与延迟奖赏折扣(DRD)之间存在适度但一致的关联。然而,社会经济地位(SES,如收入和教育)的潜在混杂影响却很少被提及。在本研究中,我们旨在研究在控制社会经济和人口统计学变量后,DRD 作为酒精使用预测指标的稳健性。此外,我们还希望在足够大的样本中测试延迟损失贴现(DLD)与饮酒之间的关联:我们在一项横断面在线研究中收集了 341 名中度至重度饮酒者(27.92 ± 21.12 克酒精/天,43.48 ± 11.90 岁,49.9% 女性,英国居民)的数据。DRD 和 DLD 采用跨时空选择任务进行测量。问卷内容包括饮酒情况(AUDIT,每周饮酒量)、教育程度和收入、过去和现在社会经济地位的主观测量以及冲动性:DRD与AUDIT得分(r = 0.15)和每周饮酒量(r = 0.12)显著相关,而DLD与AUDIT得分(r = 0.15)和每周饮酒量(r = 0.12)无关。在控制教育程度和收入的情况下,DRD 对 AUDIT 分数的预测作用仍然明显,但不明显;在控制教育程度和年龄的情况下,DRD 对 AUDIT 分数的预测作用则不明显:我们重复了饮酒与 DRD(但不是 DLD)之间微小但稳健的关联。这种关联似乎与教育和年龄有关,但与收入无关。我们的结论是,在今后调查 DRD 和饮酒的研究中,应系统地考虑社会经济和人口变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信