Regional differences in autism and intellectual disability risk associated with cesarean section delivery

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1002/aur.3247
Deborah A. Bilder, Scott Sullivan, Michelle M. Hughes, Susan Dalton, Jennifer Hall-Lande, Connor Nicholls, Amanda V. Bakian
{"title":"Regional differences in autism and intellectual disability risk associated with cesarean section delivery","authors":"Deborah A. Bilder,&nbsp;Scott Sullivan,&nbsp;Michelle M. Hughes,&nbsp;Susan Dalton,&nbsp;Jennifer Hall-Lande,&nbsp;Connor Nicholls,&nbsp;Amanda V. Bakian","doi":"10.1002/aur.3247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior epidemiological studies investigating the association between delivery mode (i.e., vaginal birth and cesarean section [C-section]) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) risk have reported mixed findings. This study examined ASD and ID risks associated with primary and repeat C-section within diverse US regions. During even years 2000–2016, 8-years-olds were identified with ASD and/or ID and matched to birth records [ASD only (<i>N</i> = 8566, 83.6% male), ASD + ID (<i>N</i> = 3445, 79.5% male), ID only (<i>N</i> = 6158, 60.8% male)] using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network methodology. The comparison birth cohort (<i>N</i> = 1,456,914, 51.1% male) comprised all births recorded in the National Center for Health Statistics corresponding to birth years and counties in which surveillance occurred. C-section rates in the birth cohort demonstrated significant regional variation with lowest rates in the West. Overall models demonstrate increased odds of disability associated with primary and repeat C-section. Adjusted models, stratified by region, identified significant variability in disability likelihood associated with repeat C-section: increased odds occurred for all case groups in the Southeast, for ASD only and ID only in the Mid-Atlantic, and no case groups in the West. Regional variability in disability risk associated with repeat C-section coincides with differences in birth cohorts' C-section rates. This suggests increased likelihood of disability is not incurred by the procedure itself, but rather C-section serves as a proxy for exposures with regional variability that influence fetal development and C-section rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"17 11","pages":"2418-2429"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior epidemiological studies investigating the association between delivery mode (i.e., vaginal birth and cesarean section [C-section]) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) risk have reported mixed findings. This study examined ASD and ID risks associated with primary and repeat C-section within diverse US regions. During even years 2000–2016, 8-years-olds were identified with ASD and/or ID and matched to birth records [ASD only (N = 8566, 83.6% male), ASD + ID (N = 3445, 79.5% male), ID only (N = 6158, 60.8% male)] using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network methodology. The comparison birth cohort (N = 1,456,914, 51.1% male) comprised all births recorded in the National Center for Health Statistics corresponding to birth years and counties in which surveillance occurred. C-section rates in the birth cohort demonstrated significant regional variation with lowest rates in the West. Overall models demonstrate increased odds of disability associated with primary and repeat C-section. Adjusted models, stratified by region, identified significant variability in disability likelihood associated with repeat C-section: increased odds occurred for all case groups in the Southeast, for ASD only and ID only in the Mid-Atlantic, and no case groups in the West. Regional variability in disability risk associated with repeat C-section coincides with differences in birth cohorts' C-section rates. This suggests increased likelihood of disability is not incurred by the procedure itself, but rather C-section serves as a proxy for exposures with regional variability that influence fetal development and C-section rates.

与剖腹产有关的自闭症和智障风险的地区差异。
先前的流行病学研究调查了分娩方式(即阴道分娩和剖腹产)与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和智障(ID)风险之间的关系,结果不一。本研究考察了美国不同地区与初次剖腹产和重复剖腹产相关的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和智力障碍(ID)风险。利用美国疾病控制和预防中心的自闭症和发育障碍监测网络方法,在 2000-2016 年间,对 8 岁儿童进行了 ASD 和/或 ID 鉴定,并与出生记录[仅 ASD(N = 8566,83.6% 为男性)、ASD + ID(N = 3445,79.5% 为男性)、仅 ID(N = 6158,60.8% 为男性)]进行了匹配。对比出生队列(N = 1,456,914,51.1% 为男性)包括国家卫生统计中心记录的所有新生儿,这些新生儿与监测所在的出生年份和县相对应。出生队列中的剖腹产率存在明显的地区差异,西部地区的剖腹产率最低。总体模型显示,初次剖腹产和重复剖腹产导致残疾的几率增加。按地区分层的调整模型确定了与重复剖腹产相关的残疾可能性的显著差异:东南部的所有病例组、大西洋中部的仅 ASD 病例组和仅 ID 病例组以及西部的无病例组都出现了几率增加的情况。与重复剖腹产相关的残疾风险的地区差异与出生队列的剖腹产率差异相吻合。这表明,残疾可能性的增加并不是由剖腹产手术本身引起的,而是剖腹产作为一种暴露的替代物,其区域差异性影响着胎儿的发育和剖腹产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信