Examining the Independent and Interactive Carryover Effects of Cognitive and Physical Exertions on Physical Performance.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Rahul K Pabla, Jeffrey D Graham, Michael W B Watterworth, Nicholas J La Delfa
{"title":"Examining the Independent and Interactive Carryover Effects of Cognitive and Physical Exertions on Physical Performance.","authors":"Rahul K Pabla, Jeffrey D Graham, Michael W B Watterworth, Nicholas J La Delfa","doi":"10.1177/00187208241293720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the effects of prior cognitive, physical, and concurrent exertion on physical performance.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatiguing cognitive and physical exertions have been shown to negatively affect subsequent task performance. However, it is not clearly understood if concurrent physical and cognitive effort may exaggerate the negative carryover effects on physical task performance when compared to cognitive or physical exertion alone.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-five participants completed four isometric handgrip endurance trials on different days. The endurance trials were preceded by four, 15-minute experimental manipulations (cognitive, physical, concurrent, control). Electromyography (EMG) and force tracing performance were monitored, with handgrip strength measured pre and post. Subjective ratings of mental and physical fatigue, as well as affect, motivation, and task self-efficacy, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handgrip strength decreased following both physical (-14.4% MVC) and concurrent (-12.3% MVC) exertion manipulations, with no changes being observed for the cognitive and control conditions. No differences were observed across conditions for endurance time, EMG, nor tracing performance. When compared to the control conditions, perceptions of mental and physical fatigue were higher following the experimental manipulation. Endurance trial self-efficacy was lower for the mental, physical and concurrent conditions compared to control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concurrent condition resulted in similar decreases in strength as the physical fatigue condition, but otherwise resulted in similar carryover effects on endurance performance across all conditions. Further study is required at higher exposure levels, or for longer exposure durations, to further probe the influence of concurrent physical and cognitive effort on task performance.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Concurrent cognitive and physical effort resulted in similar physical performance decrements to physical effort alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208241293720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the effects of prior cognitive, physical, and concurrent exertion on physical performance.

Background: Fatiguing cognitive and physical exertions have been shown to negatively affect subsequent task performance. However, it is not clearly understood if concurrent physical and cognitive effort may exaggerate the negative carryover effects on physical task performance when compared to cognitive or physical exertion alone.

Method: Twenty-five participants completed four isometric handgrip endurance trials on different days. The endurance trials were preceded by four, 15-minute experimental manipulations (cognitive, physical, concurrent, control). Electromyography (EMG) and force tracing performance were monitored, with handgrip strength measured pre and post. Subjective ratings of mental and physical fatigue, as well as affect, motivation, and task self-efficacy, were also assessed.

Results: Handgrip strength decreased following both physical (-14.4% MVC) and concurrent (-12.3% MVC) exertion manipulations, with no changes being observed for the cognitive and control conditions. No differences were observed across conditions for endurance time, EMG, nor tracing performance. When compared to the control conditions, perceptions of mental and physical fatigue were higher following the experimental manipulation. Endurance trial self-efficacy was lower for the mental, physical and concurrent conditions compared to control.

Conclusion: The concurrent condition resulted in similar decreases in strength as the physical fatigue condition, but otherwise resulted in similar carryover effects on endurance performance across all conditions. Further study is required at higher exposure levels, or for longer exposure durations, to further probe the influence of concurrent physical and cognitive effort on task performance.

Application: Concurrent cognitive and physical effort resulted in similar physical performance decrements to physical effort alone.

研究认知运动和体力运动对体能表现的独立和交互影响。
目的:本研究比较了先前的认知、体力和并发消耗对体能表现的影响:本研究比较了之前的认知、体力和并发消耗对体能表现的影响:背景:研究表明,疲劳的认知和体力消耗会对随后的任务表现产生负面影响。然而,与单独的认知或体力消耗相比,同时进行的体力和认知消耗是否会夸大对体力任务表现的负面影响,目前尚不清楚:方法:25 名参与者在不同的日期完成了四次等长手握耐力试验。方法:25 名参与者在不同的日期完成了四次等长手握耐力试验,在耐力试验之前进行了四次 15 分钟的实验操作(认知、体力、并发、控制)。对肌电图(EMG)和力追踪表现进行监测,并在实验前后测量手握强度。此外,还对精神和身体疲劳的主观评价,以及情感、动机和任务自我效能进行了评估:结果:在体力(-14.4% MVC)和并发(-12.3% MVC)消耗操作后,手握力均有所下降,而在认知和控制条件下未观察到变化。不同条件下的耐力时间、肌电图和追踪表现均无差异。与对照组相比,实验操作后的精神和身体疲劳感更强。与对照组相比,精神、身体和同时条件下的耐力试验自我效能感较低:结论:并发条件导致的力量下降与身体疲劳条件相似,但除此之外,所有条件对耐力表现的影响相似。需要进一步研究更高的暴露水平或更长的暴露持续时间,以进一步探究同时进行体力和认知努力对任务表现的影响:应用:同时进行认知努力和体力努力与单独进行体力努力会导致相似的体力表现下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信