Engaging under-represented oldest old in research: An approach for inclusive recruitment.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Naomi Paine, Melanie Lowe, Charlotte Young, Gavin Turrell
{"title":"Engaging under-represented oldest old in research: An approach for inclusive recruitment.","authors":"Naomi Paine, Melanie Lowe, Charlotte Young, Gavin Turrell","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Those aged 80 years and over are the fastest-growing sector of the Australian population but are often excluded from research. Oldest old people living alone, in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and with ill health or dementia, face additional barriers that may hinder their participation in research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper contributes timely critical commentary on methodological and ethical approaches to engaging under-represented people in research. We draw on our experiences and reflections from a study of social exclusion of people aged 80 years and older living alone in government housing in Melbourne, Australia.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>We suggest key factors to facilitate representation of this population group in future research. These factors include using doorknocking to gain access, cultivating trust with participants and gatekeepers, and conducting face-to-face home interviews. We also interrogate ethical and safety issues for researchers and oldest old participants including the potential for informed consent protocols to exclude this population group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To avoid unintentionally excluding the oldest old, researchers need to consider older persons' self-determination and advocate for methods that ensure oldest old perspectives inform future healthy ageing planning and reduce possible health and well-being inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Those aged 80 years and over are the fastest-growing sector of the Australian population but are often excluded from research. Oldest old people living alone, in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and with ill health or dementia, face additional barriers that may hinder their participation in research.

Methods: This paper contributes timely critical commentary on methodological and ethical approaches to engaging under-represented people in research. We draw on our experiences and reflections from a study of social exclusion of people aged 80 years and older living alone in government housing in Melbourne, Australia.

Results and discussion: We suggest key factors to facilitate representation of this population group in future research. These factors include using doorknocking to gain access, cultivating trust with participants and gatekeepers, and conducting face-to-face home interviews. We also interrogate ethical and safety issues for researchers and oldest old participants including the potential for informed consent protocols to exclude this population group.

Conclusion: To avoid unintentionally excluding the oldest old, researchers need to consider older persons' self-determination and advocate for methods that ensure oldest old perspectives inform future healthy ageing planning and reduce possible health and well-being inequities.

让代表性不足的耄耋老人参与研究:包容性招聘方法。
导言:80 岁及以上的老人是澳大利亚人口中增长最快的群体,但他们往往被排除在研究之外。独居、居住在贫困社区、健康状况不佳或患有痴呆症的高龄老人面临着更多障碍,可能会阻碍他们参与研究:本文对让代表性不足的人群参与研究的方法和伦理途径进行了及时的批判性评论。我们借鉴了对澳大利亚墨尔本市 80 岁及以上独居老人的社会排斥研究中的经验和反思:结果与讨论:我们提出了在未来研究中促进该人群代表性的关键因素。结果与讨论:我们提出了在未来研究中促进这一人群代表性的关键因素,包括使用敲门法获得访问权、培养与参与者和看门人之间的信任以及进行面对面的家庭访谈。我们还探讨了研究人员和高龄参与者的伦理和安全问题,包括知情同意协议将这一人群排除在外的可能性:为避免无意中排除高龄老人,研究人员需要考虑老年人的自我决定权,并倡导确保高龄老人的观点能为未来的健康老龄化规划提供参考,减少可能出现的健康和福祉不平等现象的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信