Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius
{"title":"Quadriceps Strength Testing Practices & Barriers During Return to Sport from ACL Reconstruction: A Survey of Collegiate Athletic Trainers.","authors":"Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.
Objectives: 1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting: Online survey.
Patients or other participants: 243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).
Main outcomes: Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.
Results: Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).
Conclusions: While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries.
The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.