Association of housing tenure and unaffordable housing with preterm birth and other adverse birth outcomes in Canada: a population-based study.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Azar Mehrabadi, Gabriel D Shapiro, Tracey Bushnik, Jay Kaufman, Seungmi Yang
{"title":"Association of housing tenure and unaffordable housing with preterm birth and other adverse birth outcomes in Canada: a population-based study.","authors":"Azar Mehrabadi, Gabriel D Shapiro, Tracey Bushnik, Jay Kaufman, Seungmi Yang","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic risk factors are known drivers of adverse birth outcomes. Housing is a key target for policy interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the associations of housing tenure (renting vs owning) and unaffordable housing with preterm birth and other adverse birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2014-2016 Canadian birth registration data linked with the 2016 long-form census and included singleton births among homeowners and renters. Unaffordable housing was defined at the family level as the proportion of pre-tax income spent on shelter, using a 30% cut-off. The primary outcome was preterm birth. Secondary outcomes were stillbirth and infant death. Log-binomial regression estimated the association of housing tenure and unaffordability with outcomes adjusting for sociodemographic risk factors and parity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 162 700 live births and stillbirths (52 740 renters, 109 960 owners), 31% of renters and 17% of owners experienced unaffordable housing. Renting was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (7.5% vs 6.1%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.13; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.17), stillbirth (9.5 vs 6.6 per 1000; aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.56) and infant death (4.2 vs 3.0 per 1000; aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.82). There was no association of housing unaffordability with preterm birth or other adverse birth outcomes among owners or renters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationally representative study in Canada found associations between renting versus owning and preterm birth, stillbirth and infant death, as well as a high burden of unaffordable housing, particularly among renters. This study suggests that home tenure itself is a social determinant of adverse birth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic risk factors are known drivers of adverse birth outcomes. Housing is a key target for policy interventions.

Objective: To estimate the associations of housing tenure (renting vs owning) and unaffordable housing with preterm birth and other adverse birth outcomes.

Methods: We used 2014-2016 Canadian birth registration data linked with the 2016 long-form census and included singleton births among homeowners and renters. Unaffordable housing was defined at the family level as the proportion of pre-tax income spent on shelter, using a 30% cut-off. The primary outcome was preterm birth. Secondary outcomes were stillbirth and infant death. Log-binomial regression estimated the association of housing tenure and unaffordability with outcomes adjusting for sociodemographic risk factors and parity.

Results: Among 162 700 live births and stillbirths (52 740 renters, 109 960 owners), 31% of renters and 17% of owners experienced unaffordable housing. Renting was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (7.5% vs 6.1%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.13; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.17), stillbirth (9.5 vs 6.6 per 1000; aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.56) and infant death (4.2 vs 3.0 per 1000; aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.82). There was no association of housing unaffordability with preterm birth or other adverse birth outcomes among owners or renters.

Conclusions: This nationally representative study in Canada found associations between renting versus owning and preterm birth, stillbirth and infant death, as well as a high burden of unaffordable housing, particularly among renters. This study suggests that home tenure itself is a social determinant of adverse birth outcomes.

加拿大住房保有权和负担不起的住房与早产及其他不良出生结果的关系:一项基于人口的研究。
背景:社会经济风险因素是导致不良出生结果的已知因素。住房是政策干预的主要目标:估计住房保有权(租房与自有住房)和负担不起的住房与早产和其他不良出生结果的关联:我们使用了 2014-2016 年加拿大出生登记数据与 2016 年的长式人口普查数据,并纳入了房主和租房者的单胎新生儿。在家庭层面,无法负担的住房被定义为税前收入中用于住房的比例,以 30% 为分界线。主要结果是早产。次要结果是死胎和婴儿死亡。对数二项式回归估计了住房保有权和负担不起与结果之间的关系,并对社会人口风险因素和奇偶性进行了调整:在 162 700 例活产和死产中(租房者 52 740 例,房主 109 960 例),31% 的租房者和 17% 的房主经历过住房负担不起的情况。租房与早产(7.5% 对 6.1%;调整风险比 (aRR) 1.13;95% CI 1.08 至 1.17)、死胎(9.5 对 6.6‰;aRR 1.33,95% CI 1.14 至 1.56)和婴儿死亡(4.2 对 3.0‰;aRR 1.52,95% CI 1.26 至 1.82)的风险增加有关。在房主或租房者中,住房负担不起与早产或其他不良出生结果没有关联:这项在加拿大进行的具有全国代表性的研究发现,租房与拥有住房之间存在关联,早产、死产和婴儿死亡也与住房负担过重有关,尤其是在租房者中。这项研究表明,住房保有权本身就是导致不良出生结果的一个社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信