Valérie Krivosic, Paul Goupillou, Frederic Buffon-Porcher, Hélène Morel, Stéphanie Guey, Ramin Tadayoni, Elisabeth Tournier Lasserve, Hugues Chabriat, Alain Gaudric
{"title":"Assessment of retinal arteriolar tortuosity in patients with COL4A1 or COL4A2 mutations.","authors":"Valérie Krivosic, Paul Goupillou, Frederic Buffon-Porcher, Hélène Morel, Stéphanie Guey, Ramin Tadayoni, Elisabeth Tournier Lasserve, Hugues Chabriat, Alain Gaudric","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Qualitative and quantitative analyzes of retinal arteriolar tortuosity (RAT) in patients with COL4A1 and COL4A2 mutations to identify a tortuosity index (TI) threshold for detecting increased RAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two eyes of 28 patients were included. Group 1 included eyes with a normal arteriolar pattern (n=19, 37%), group 2 included eyes with moderately increased arteriolar tortuosity (n=13, 25%), and group 3 included eyes with typical abnormal arteriolar tortuosity (n=20, 38%). The TI was measured by calculating the arc-to-chord ratio of arterioles and venules in the posterior pole.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean arteriolar TI was significantly higher in all groups with a COL4A1/A2 mutation compared to controls: 1.19 ± 0.03, 1.24 ±0.05, and 1.57 ± 0.23 in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, vs. 1.12 ± 0.01 (all p <0.0001). The TI threshold was 1.13, with a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 100%. The area under the curve was 0.995.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring the arteriolar TI allowed diagnosing increased RAT in all eyes with a COL4A1/A2 mutation, whereas the subjective assessment suspected or detected it in only 62% of eyes. In adult patients with cerebral microangiopathy, detecting increased RAT, even when mild, directs the diagnosis towards COL4A1/A2-related cerebroretinal angiopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Qualitative and quantitative analyzes of retinal arteriolar tortuosity (RAT) in patients with COL4A1 and COL4A2 mutations to identify a tortuosity index (TI) threshold for detecting increased RAT.
Methods: Fifty-two eyes of 28 patients were included. Group 1 included eyes with a normal arteriolar pattern (n=19, 37%), group 2 included eyes with moderately increased arteriolar tortuosity (n=13, 25%), and group 3 included eyes with typical abnormal arteriolar tortuosity (n=20, 38%). The TI was measured by calculating the arc-to-chord ratio of arterioles and venules in the posterior pole.
Results: The mean arteriolar TI was significantly higher in all groups with a COL4A1/A2 mutation compared to controls: 1.19 ± 0.03, 1.24 ±0.05, and 1.57 ± 0.23 in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, vs. 1.12 ± 0.01 (all p <0.0001). The TI threshold was 1.13, with a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 100%. The area under the curve was 0.995.
Conclusion: Measuring the arteriolar TI allowed diagnosing increased RAT in all eyes with a COL4A1/A2 mutation, whereas the subjective assessment suspected or detected it in only 62% of eyes. In adult patients with cerebral microangiopathy, detecting increased RAT, even when mild, directs the diagnosis towards COL4A1/A2-related cerebroretinal angiopathy.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.