Susanna Tagliabue, Michał Kacprzak, Anna Rey-Perez, Jacinto Baena, Marilyn Riveiro, Federica Maruccia, Jonas B Fischer, Maria A Poca, Turgut Durduran
{"title":"How the heterogeneity of the severely injured brain affects hybrid diffuse optical signals: case examples and guidelines.","authors":"Susanna Tagliabue, Michał Kacprzak, Anna Rey-Perez, Jacinto Baena, Marilyn Riveiro, Federica Maruccia, Jonas B Fischer, Maria A Poca, Turgut Durduran","doi":"10.1117/1.NPh.11.4.045005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>A shortcoming of the routine clinical use of diffuse optics (DO) in the injured head has been that the results from commercial near-infrared spectroscopy-based devices are not reproducible, often give physiologically invalid values, and differ among systems. Besides the limitations due to the physics of continuous-wave light sources, one culprit is the head heterogeneity and the underlying morphological and functional abnormalities of the probed tissue.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to investigate the effect that different tissue alterations in the damaged head have on DO signals and provide guidelines to avoid data misinterpretation.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>DO measurements and computed tomography scans were acquired on brain-injured patients. The relationship between the signals and the underlying tissue types was classified on a case-by-case basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Examples and suggestions to establish quality control routines were provided. The findings suggested guidelines for carrying out DO measurements and speculations toward improved devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We advocate for the standardization of the DO measurements to secure a role for DO in neurocritical care. We suggest that blind measurements are unacceptably problematic due to confounding effects and care using <i>a priori</i> and <i>a posteriori</i> quality control routines that go beyond an assessment of the signal-to-noise ratio that is typically utilized.</p>","PeriodicalId":54335,"journal":{"name":"Neurophotonics","volume":"11 4","pages":"045005"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophotonics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.11.4.045005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Significance: A shortcoming of the routine clinical use of diffuse optics (DO) in the injured head has been that the results from commercial near-infrared spectroscopy-based devices are not reproducible, often give physiologically invalid values, and differ among systems. Besides the limitations due to the physics of continuous-wave light sources, one culprit is the head heterogeneity and the underlying morphological and functional abnormalities of the probed tissue.
Aim: The aim is to investigate the effect that different tissue alterations in the damaged head have on DO signals and provide guidelines to avoid data misinterpretation.
Approach: DO measurements and computed tomography scans were acquired on brain-injured patients. The relationship between the signals and the underlying tissue types was classified on a case-by-case basis.
Results: Examples and suggestions to establish quality control routines were provided. The findings suggested guidelines for carrying out DO measurements and speculations toward improved devices.
Conclusions: We advocate for the standardization of the DO measurements to secure a role for DO in neurocritical care. We suggest that blind measurements are unacceptably problematic due to confounding effects and care using a priori and a posteriori quality control routines that go beyond an assessment of the signal-to-noise ratio that is typically utilized.
意义重大:在受伤的头部常规临床使用漫反射光学(DO)的一个缺点是,基于商用近红外光谱仪的设备所得出的结果不具有可重复性,通常会给出生理上无效的数值,而且不同系统的结果也不尽相同。除了连续波光源的物理特性造成的限制外,头部的异质性以及探查组织的潜在形态和功能异常也是罪魁祸首之一。目的:旨在研究受损头部的不同组织变化对溶解氧信号的影响,并为避免数据误读提供指导:方法:对脑损伤患者进行溶解氧测量和计算机断层扫描。方法:对脑损伤患者进行溶解氧测量和计算机断层扫描,根据具体情况对信号与基础组织类型之间的关系进行分类:结果:提供了建立质量控制程序的实例和建议。研究结果提出了进行 DO 测量的指导原则,并对改进设备进行了推测:我们主张对溶解氧测量进行标准化,以确保溶解氧在神经重症监护中发挥作用。我们建议,由于混杂效应,盲法测量存在不可接受的问题,因此应使用先验和后验质量控制程序,而不是通常使用的信噪比评估。
期刊介绍:
At the interface of optics and neuroscience, Neurophotonics is a peer-reviewed journal that covers advances in optical technology applicable to study of the brain and their impact on the basic and clinical neuroscience applications.