Evaluating chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients at a single Australian center.

Journal of Trauma and Injury Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.20408/jti.2024.0020
Natalie Quarmby, Minh Tu Vo, Sean Weng Chan
{"title":"Evaluating chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients at a single Australian center.","authors":"Natalie Quarmby, Minh Tu Vo, Sean Weng Chan","doi":"10.20408/jti.2024.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trauma patients are at an elevated risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), with the subsequent mortality in patients requiring intensive care unit admission ranging from 25% to 38%. There remains significant variability in clinical practice related to VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients due to the frequent presence of contraindications impacting the timing and consistency of application. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the current practice of chemical VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients at a single Australian center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective review was conducted on patients admitted to the ACT Trauma Service (Canberra, Australia) from July to November 2022. The included patients were 18 years or older, without a direct contraindication to anticoagulation, who received chemical VTE prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) for at least three doses and underwent subsequent testing of anti-factor Xa (aFXa) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 187 patients were admitted, of whom 63 were included in the study. Of these, 47 patients achieved therapeutic levels of anticoagulation as determined by their aFXa levels, while 16 were subtherapeutic. The only statistically significant difference between the two groups was in weight, with patients in the subtherapeutic group weighing an average of 91.9 kg compared to 79.1 kg in the therapeutic group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A fixed-dose enoxaparin regimen was utilized, with limited individualization based on patient factors, such as injuries, comorbidities, and other biological factors. Sixteen patients (25%) had subtherapeutic VTE prophylaxis, as measured by aFXa levels. Higher weight was significantly correlated with inadequate VTE prophylaxis dosing. While age, sex, and smoking status might play important roles in clinical decision-making, weight-based dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin may be more effective in achieving adequate VTE prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Injury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2024.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Trauma patients are at an elevated risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), with the subsequent mortality in patients requiring intensive care unit admission ranging from 25% to 38%. There remains significant variability in clinical practice related to VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients due to the frequent presence of contraindications impacting the timing and consistency of application. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the current practice of chemical VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients at a single Australian center.

Methods: A prospective review was conducted on patients admitted to the ACT Trauma Service (Canberra, Australia) from July to November 2022. The included patients were 18 years or older, without a direct contraindication to anticoagulation, who received chemical VTE prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) for at least three doses and underwent subsequent testing of anti-factor Xa (aFXa) levels.

Results: During the study period, 187 patients were admitted, of whom 63 were included in the study. Of these, 47 patients achieved therapeutic levels of anticoagulation as determined by their aFXa levels, while 16 were subtherapeutic. The only statistically significant difference between the two groups was in weight, with patients in the subtherapeutic group weighing an average of 91.9 kg compared to 79.1 kg in the therapeutic group (P<0.05).

Conclusions: A fixed-dose enoxaparin regimen was utilized, with limited individualization based on patient factors, such as injuries, comorbidities, and other biological factors. Sixteen patients (25%) had subtherapeutic VTE prophylaxis, as measured by aFXa levels. Higher weight was significantly correlated with inadequate VTE prophylaxis dosing. While age, sex, and smoking status might play important roles in clinical decision-making, weight-based dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin may be more effective in achieving adequate VTE prophylaxis.

澳大利亚一家中心对创伤患者的化学性静脉血栓栓塞预防措施进行评估。
目的:创伤患者罹患静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的风险较高,需要入住重症监护室的患者死亡率为 25% 至 38%。由于经常出现的禁忌症影响了用药的时间和一致性,因此在创伤患者的 VTE 预防临床实践中仍存在很大的差异。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚一家中心目前对创伤患者进行化学性 VTE 预防的有效性:方法:对澳大利亚首都地区创伤服务中心(澳大利亚堪培拉)2022 年 7 月至 11 月期间收治的患者进行了前瞻性回顾。纳入的患者年龄在18岁或18岁以上,无直接抗凝禁忌症,接受了至少三次低分子量肝素(依诺肝素)化学VTE预防治疗,并接受了后续的抗因子Xa(aFXa)水平检测:研究期间共收治了 187 名患者,其中 63 人被纳入研究。其中,47 名患者的 aFXa 水平达到了抗凝治疗水平,16 名患者处于治疗水平以下。两组患者在体重上的差异唯一具有统计学意义,亚治疗组患者的平均体重为 91.9 千克,而治疗组患者的平均体重为 79.1 千克(PConclusions:采用了固定剂量的依诺肝素治疗方案,但根据患者伤情、合并症和其他生物因素等因素进行的个性化治疗有限。根据 aFXa 水平,16 名患者(25%)的 VTE 预防治疗效果不佳。较高的体重与 VTE 预防剂量不足明显相关。虽然年龄、性别和吸烟状况在临床决策中可能起着重要作用,但基于体重的低分子量肝素剂量可能更能有效实现充分的 VTE 预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信