(FEV3-FEV1)/FVC: a terminal-airflow variable for airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation prediction in patients with symptoms despite preserved spirometry.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Wuping Bao, Yanmei Lin, Lei Zhao, Yingying Zhang, Jingwang Lin, Junfeng Yin, Yiting Wu, Jifei Wu, Yan Zhou, Min Zhang
{"title":"(FEV<sub>3</sub>-FEV<sub>1</sub>)/FVC: a terminal-airflow variable for airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation prediction in patients with symptoms despite preserved spirometry.","authors":"Wuping Bao, Yanmei Lin, Lei Zhao, Yingying Zhang, Jingwang Lin, Junfeng Yin, Yiting Wu, Jifei Wu, Yan Zhou, Min Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small-airway function assessment is crucial for asthma diagnosis and management. Abnormalities in terminal airflow deserve attention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the second and third seconds to forced vital capacity ([FEV<sub>3</sub>-FEV<sub>1</sub>]/FVC) correlates with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation in patients with preserved spirometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled patients with FEV<sub>1</sub> ≥ 80% predicted, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ≥ 0.7, and recurring asthma-like symptoms. Data included demographics, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), impulse oscillometry, and spirometry. Univariate and combined models predicting AHR was analyzed in 553 patients and validated in 561. Correlations between sputum inflammation and spirometrics were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AHR<sup>+</sup> patients exhibited higher (FEV<sub>3</sub>-FEV<sub>1</sub>)/FVC ratios compared to AHR<sup>-</sup>. This ratio showed the strongest association with the methacholine dose causing a 20% FEV<sub>1</sub> decrease (PD<sub>20</sub>) and the response dose ratio (RDR)(r = -0.26 and 0.39, respectively; P < .001, both). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AHR diagnosis using (FEV<sub>3</sub>-FEV<sub>1</sub>)/FVC was 0.751, increasing to 0.821 when combined with FeNO, confirmed in the validation cohort. (FEV<sub>3</sub>-FEV<sub>1</sub>)/FVC was superior to maximal expiratory flow at 50% of forced vital capacity for identifying eosinophilic airway inflammation characterized by elevated FeNO levels. It correlated better with sputum eosinophil count than with the other spirometrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated (FEV<sub>3</sub>-FEV<sub>1</sub>)/FVC were evident in AHR<sup>+</sup> patients with preserved FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratios. It serves as a sensitive marker of AHR and airway inflammation correlating with RDR, PD<sub>20</sub>, and sputum eosinophils, suggesting its utility in monitoring patients at risk for uncontrolled asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small-airway function assessment is crucial for asthma diagnosis and management. Abnormalities in terminal airflow deserve attention.

Objective: This study investigated whether the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the second and third seconds to forced vital capacity ([FEV3-FEV1]/FVC) correlates with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation in patients with preserved spirometry.

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled patients with FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted, FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, and recurring asthma-like symptoms. Data included demographics, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), impulse oscillometry, and spirometry. Univariate and combined models predicting AHR was analyzed in 553 patients and validated in 561. Correlations between sputum inflammation and spirometrics were also assessed.

Results: AHR+ patients exhibited higher (FEV3-FEV1)/FVC ratios compared to AHR-. This ratio showed the strongest association with the methacholine dose causing a 20% FEV1 decrease (PD20) and the response dose ratio (RDR)(r = -0.26 and 0.39, respectively; P < .001, both). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AHR diagnosis using (FEV3-FEV1)/FVC was 0.751, increasing to 0.821 when combined with FeNO, confirmed in the validation cohort. (FEV3-FEV1)/FVC was superior to maximal expiratory flow at 50% of forced vital capacity for identifying eosinophilic airway inflammation characterized by elevated FeNO levels. It correlated better with sputum eosinophil count than with the other spirometrics.

Conclusion: Elevated (FEV3-FEV1)/FVC were evident in AHR+ patients with preserved FEV1/FVC ratios. It serves as a sensitive marker of AHR and airway inflammation correlating with RDR, PD20, and sputum eosinophils, suggesting its utility in monitoring patients at risk for uncontrolled asthma.

(FEV3-FEV1)/FVC:用于预测肺活量正常但有症状患者的气道高反应性和炎症的末端气流变量。
背景:小气道功能评估对哮喘的诊断和治疗至关重要。末端气流异常值得关注:本研究探讨了第二秒和第三秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量之比([FEV3-FEV1]/FVC)是否与肺活量保留患者的气道高反应性(AHR)和炎症相关:这项横断面研究招募了 FEV1 预测值≥ 80%、FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 和反复出现哮喘样症状的患者。数据包括人口统计学、呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)、脉冲振荡仪和肺活量测定。对 553 名患者进行了预测 AHR 的单变量和组合模型分析,并对 561 名患者进行了验证。同时还评估了痰液炎症与肺活量之间的相关性:结果:与 AHR- 相比,AHR+ 患者的 (FEV3-FEV1)/FVC 比率更高。该比率与导致 FEV1 下降 20% 的甲基胆碱剂量 (PD20) 和反应剂量比 (RDR) 的关系最为密切(r = -0.26 和 0.39;P < .001,两者均如此)。使用 (FEV3-FEV1)/FVC 诊断 AHR 的接收器操作特征曲线下面积为 0.751,与 FeNO 结合使用时增加到 0.821,这在验证队列中得到了证实。在识别以 FeNO 水平升高为特征的嗜酸性粒细胞气道炎症方面,(FEV3-FEV1)/FVC 优于 50%用力呼吸量时的最大呼气流量。它与痰中嗜酸性粒细胞计数的相关性优于其他肺活量指标:结论:FEV3-FEV1/FVC 升高在 FEV1/FVC 比值保持不变的 AHR+ 患者中十分明显。它是 AHR 和气道炎症的灵敏标记,与 RDR、PD20 和痰嗜酸性粒细胞相关,表明它在监测有失控哮喘风险的患者中很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信