SARC-CalF using calf circumference adjusted for BMI predicts 6-mo readmission and mortality in hospitalized patients: a secondary analysis of a cohort study
{"title":"SARC-CalF using calf circumference adjusted for BMI predicts 6-mo readmission and mortality in hospitalized patients: a secondary analysis of a cohort study","authors":"Camila Ferri Burgel , Bruna Zardo Oliveira de Carvalho , Bárbara Meichtry Milesi , Flávia Moraes Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sarcopenia is a prevalent condition associated with worse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. The SARC-CalF is an accurate instrument for its screening; however, it includes the calf circumference (CC) measure as a criterion, which is influenced by adiposity. An adjustment for CC based on body mass index (BMI) has been proposed, but the literature lacks studies evaluating the SARC-CalF using adjusted CC.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC and compare it between adult and older hospitalized patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a secondary analysis of a cohort with prospective data collection, including individuals aged ≥18 y who were lucid and able to communicate. SARC-CalF was applied using BMI-adjusted CC, obtained by subtracting 3, 7, and 12 cm from CC values when BMI was 25 to 29.99, 30 to 39.99, and ≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Outcomes of interest included prolonged hospital stay, in-hospital death, hospital readmission, and mortality 6 mo after discharge. Logistic and Cox regression analyses, adjusted for Charlson Comorbidity Index and sex, were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed data from 554 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 14.9 y, 52.9% male). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia by SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC were identified in 40.4% of patients (38.6% of adults and 42.7% of older patients, <em>P</em> = 0.380). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia were associated with hospital readmission in adults (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 2.9), and 6-mo death in both adult (OR: 4.0; 95% CI: 1.3, 12.1) and older patients (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 6.6). It was not independently associated with in-hospital outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC identifies a high frequency of patients with suggestive signs of sarcopenia, regardless of age, and it is independently associated with worse outcomes 6 mo after discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 151-157"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916524008177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sarcopenia is a prevalent condition associated with worse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. The SARC-CalF is an accurate instrument for its screening; however, it includes the calf circumference (CC) measure as a criterion, which is influenced by adiposity. An adjustment for CC based on body mass index (BMI) has been proposed, but the literature lacks studies evaluating the SARC-CalF using adjusted CC.
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC and compare it between adult and older hospitalized patients.
Methods
This is a secondary analysis of a cohort with prospective data collection, including individuals aged ≥18 y who were lucid and able to communicate. SARC-CalF was applied using BMI-adjusted CC, obtained by subtracting 3, 7, and 12 cm from CC values when BMI was 25 to 29.99, 30 to 39.99, and ≥40 kg/m2, respectively. Outcomes of interest included prolonged hospital stay, in-hospital death, hospital readmission, and mortality 6 mo after discharge. Logistic and Cox regression analyses, adjusted for Charlson Comorbidity Index and sex, were performed.
Results
We analyzed data from 554 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 14.9 y, 52.9% male). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia by SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC were identified in 40.4% of patients (38.6% of adults and 42.7% of older patients, P = 0.380). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia were associated with hospital readmission in adults (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 2.9), and 6-mo death in both adult (OR: 4.0; 95% CI: 1.3, 12.1) and older patients (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 6.6). It was not independently associated with in-hospital outcomes.
Conclusions
SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC identifies a high frequency of patients with suggestive signs of sarcopenia, regardless of age, and it is independently associated with worse outcomes 6 mo after discharge.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism.
Purpose:
The purpose of AJCN is to:
Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition.
Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits.
Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition.
Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches.
Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles.
Peer Review Process:
All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.