Can the Whiteley Index be used to assess health anxiety in adolescents from the general population?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Charlotte Steen Duholm , Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard , Eva Ørnbøl , Kaare Bro Wellnitz , Per Hove Thomsen , Martin Køster Rimvall , Charlotte Ulrikka Rask
{"title":"Can the Whiteley Index be used to assess health anxiety in adolescents from the general population?","authors":"Charlotte Steen Duholm ,&nbsp;Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard ,&nbsp;Eva Ørnbøl ,&nbsp;Kaare Bro Wellnitz ,&nbsp;Per Hove Thomsen ,&nbsp;Martin Køster Rimvall ,&nbsp;Charlotte Ulrikka Rask","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Health anxiety (HA) is characterized by worry about being or becoming ill. The Whiteley Index (WI) is a valid and frequently used measure for HA in adults. We examined item response distribution, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity of four different one-factor models of the WI (an 8-item model, the widely used WI-7, a revised 7-item version (WI-7-R), and a 6-item version (WI-6-R)) in a population-based sample of adolescents, using data from the 16–17-year follow-up of the Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 (<em>N</em> = 2521, 16–17 years old). Females generally scored higher on all eight WI items compared to males. Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing. The WI-7-R and WI-6-R both showed acceptable fits. All four models showed good internal consistency. Hypothesis testing showed good discriminant validity, as the hypotheses on positive correlations with anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms, as well as a negative correlation with health-related quality of life, were met for both the WI-7-R and WI-6-R. We advocate for the use of the WI-6-R, which focuses on core HA symptoms and excludes items concerning physical symptoms. The overall testing supports that the WI-6-R possesses valid psychometric properties for use with adolescents in the general population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 111946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health anxiety (HA) is characterized by worry about being or becoming ill. The Whiteley Index (WI) is a valid and frequently used measure for HA in adults. We examined item response distribution, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity of four different one-factor models of the WI (an 8-item model, the widely used WI-7, a revised 7-item version (WI-7-R), and a 6-item version (WI-6-R)) in a population-based sample of adolescents, using data from the 16–17-year follow-up of the Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 (N = 2521, 16–17 years old). Females generally scored higher on all eight WI items compared to males. Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing. The WI-7-R and WI-6-R both showed acceptable fits. All four models showed good internal consistency. Hypothesis testing showed good discriminant validity, as the hypotheses on positive correlations with anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms, as well as a negative correlation with health-related quality of life, were met for both the WI-7-R and WI-6-R. We advocate for the use of the WI-6-R, which focuses on core HA symptoms and excludes items concerning physical symptoms. The overall testing supports that the WI-6-R possesses valid psychometric properties for use with adolescents in the general population.
怀特利指数能否用于评估普通人群中青少年的健康焦虑?
健康焦虑(HA)的特点是担心自己生病或成为病人。怀特利指数(WI)是一种有效且常用的成人健康焦虑测量方法。我们利用哥本哈根儿童队列 2000(N = 2521,16-17 岁)16-17 年的随访数据,在以人口为基础的青少年样本中研究了 WI 的项目反应分布、下限效应和上限效应以及四种不同单因素模型(8 个项目模型、广泛使用的 WI-7、修订的 7 个项目版本(WI-7-R)和 6 个项目版本(WI-6-R))的结构效度。与男性相比,女性在所有八个 WI 项目上的得分普遍较高。结构效度通过确认性因子分析和假设检验进行检验。WI-7-R和WI-6-R均显示出可接受的拟合度。所有四个模型都显示出良好的内部一致性。假设检验显示,WI-7-R 和 WI-6-R 均符合与焦虑、抑郁和身体症状呈正相关以及与健康相关生活质量呈负相关的假设,因此具有良好的判别效度。我们主张使用 WI-6-R,因为它侧重于核心的医管局症状,而不包括有关躯体症状的项目。总体测试结果表明,WI-6-R 具有有效的心理测量特性,适用于普通人群中的青少年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信