Health care disparities in complication and mortality rates following surgical management of cauda equina syndrome in New York State.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Peter Y Joo, Anusha Patil, Jay Moran, Lancelot Benn, Addisu Mesfin
{"title":"Health care disparities in complication and mortality rates following surgical management of cauda equina syndrome in New York State.","authors":"Peter Y Joo, Anusha Patil, Jay Moran, Lancelot Benn, Addisu Mesfin","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2410514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>While healthcare disparities related to race and ethnicity are well reported for non-emergent conditions, the literature on disparities in outcomes of emergent spinal conditions such as cauda equina syndrome (CES) remains sparse.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate racial disparities in complication, mortality, and readmission rates following surgical intervention for CES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database demonstrates that among patients surgically treated for CES in New York between 2015 and 2020. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the association of race and outcome variables after controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, length of stay, insurance, and hospital characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2,114 patients who underwent lumbar surgery for CES were identified. The study population was comprised of Black patients (177, 8%), White patients (79%, 1680), and Asian patients (257, 12%). Options for surgery included lumbar decompression (821, 38.8%), fusion (746, 35.3%), or both (547, 25.9%). On multivariate analysis, the odds of 30-day mortality were 2.98-fold greater in Black patients than in other patients (P = 0.029). By 180 and 360 days, the odds of mortality were 4.27 and 3.05-fold greater in Black patients than in other patients, respectively (P < 0.001 each). Thirty-day readmissions were 1.87-fold greater in Black patients than others (P = 0.004). No difference in overall complication rate was found between Black patients and all other race groups (P = 0.306).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black patients surgically treated for CES face significantly higher rates of mortality and readmission than their non-Black counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2410514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: While healthcare disparities related to race and ethnicity are well reported for non-emergent conditions, the literature on disparities in outcomes of emergent spinal conditions such as cauda equina syndrome (CES) remains sparse.

Objective: To evaluate racial disparities in complication, mortality, and readmission rates following surgical intervention for CES.

Methods: This retrospective analysis of The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database demonstrates that among patients surgically treated for CES in New York between 2015 and 2020. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the association of race and outcome variables after controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, length of stay, insurance, and hospital characteristics.

Results: Overall, 2,114 patients who underwent lumbar surgery for CES were identified. The study population was comprised of Black patients (177, 8%), White patients (79%, 1680), and Asian patients (257, 12%). Options for surgery included lumbar decompression (821, 38.8%), fusion (746, 35.3%), or both (547, 25.9%). On multivariate analysis, the odds of 30-day mortality were 2.98-fold greater in Black patients than in other patients (P = 0.029). By 180 and 360 days, the odds of mortality were 4.27 and 3.05-fold greater in Black patients than in other patients, respectively (P < 0.001 each). Thirty-day readmissions were 1.87-fold greater in Black patients than others (P = 0.004). No difference in overall complication rate was found between Black patients and all other race groups (P = 0.306).

Conclusions: Black patients surgically treated for CES face significantly higher rates of mortality and readmission than their non-Black counterparts.

纽约州马尾综合征手术治疗后并发症和死亡率的医疗差距。
背景:虽然与种族和民族有关的医疗保健差异在非急症方面已有大量报道,但有关马尾综合征(CES)等急症脊柱疾病治疗效果差异的文献仍然很少:评估 CES 手术治疗后并发症、死亡率和再入院率的种族差异:这项对全州规划与研究合作系统(SPARCS)数据库的回顾性分析表明,在 2015 年至 2020 年期间,纽约州接受手术治疗的 CES 患者中,种族间存在差异。在控制年龄、性别、合并症、住院时间、保险和医院特征后,进行了双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以分析种族与结果变量之间的关联:共有2114名患者因CES接受了腰椎手术。研究对象包括黑人患者(177人,占8%)、白人患者(79%,1680人)和亚裔患者(257人,占12%)。手术选择包括腰椎减压术(821人,占38.8%)、融合术(746人,占35.3%)或两者兼有(547人,占25.9%)。通过多变量分析,黑人患者的 30 天死亡率是其他患者的 2.98 倍(P = 0.029)。在 180 天和 360 天内,黑人患者的死亡几率分别是其他患者的 4.27 倍和 3.05 倍(P 结论:黑人患者的死亡几率是其他患者的 2.98 倍(P = 0.029):接受 CES 手术治疗的黑人患者的死亡率和再入院率明显高于非黑人患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信