RATE OF ASCENDING AORTIC ENLARGEMENT IN A LARGE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC COHORT: ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORS AND ADVERSE AORTIC EVENTS.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kristen Westenfield, Steven M Bradley, Larissa Stanberry, Kevin M Harris
{"title":"RATE OF ASCENDING AORTIC ENLARGEMENT IN A LARGE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC COHORT: ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORS AND ADVERSE AORTIC EVENTS.","authors":"Kristen Westenfield, Steven M Bradley, Larissa Stanberry, Kevin M Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding ascending aortic aneurysm growth and associated risk factors is critical to advising appropriate echocardiographic follow-up intervals for patients. This study aimed to identify aortic aneurysm growth rate on serial echocardiograms as well as the clinical and demographic variables that contribute to baseline aortic size and subsequent aortic growth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients identified with ascending aortic aneurysm and undergoing serial echocardiograms within five years were evaluated. Ascending aortic size was measured as part of routine echocardiogram exams. Clinical and demographic variables including aortic valve type (trileaflet, bicuspid or prosthetic) were evaluated for association with baseline aortic size as well as with aortic progression rate. Clinical events including aortic dissection, elective or emergent surgical repair were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3639 patients were identified, (78% males, median age of 69 years, 175 (4.8%) with bicuspid valve, and 206 (5.6%) with prior aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients with larger aorta at baseline were older with higher tobacco use and prior prosthetic valves. Over a mean of 2.4 years, aortic growth was observed and differed by valve type (trileaflet valve: 0.08 mm/year , bicuspid valve: 0.4 mm/year , p<0.001). In six patients who developed aortic dissection the estimated average annual growth rate was 0.98 mm/year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large echo cohort, aortic aneurysm growth rate was 0.08 mm/year though higher in those with bicuspid valves ( 0.4 mm/ year), but initial aortic size did not correlate with change in the aortic progression rate. This data may help inform recommended echocardiographic surveillance intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.09.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding ascending aortic aneurysm growth and associated risk factors is critical to advising appropriate echocardiographic follow-up intervals for patients. This study aimed to identify aortic aneurysm growth rate on serial echocardiograms as well as the clinical and demographic variables that contribute to baseline aortic size and subsequent aortic growth.

Methods: Patients identified with ascending aortic aneurysm and undergoing serial echocardiograms within five years were evaluated. Ascending aortic size was measured as part of routine echocardiogram exams. Clinical and demographic variables including aortic valve type (trileaflet, bicuspid or prosthetic) were evaluated for association with baseline aortic size as well as with aortic progression rate. Clinical events including aortic dissection, elective or emergent surgical repair were recorded.

Results: 3639 patients were identified, (78% males, median age of 69 years, 175 (4.8%) with bicuspid valve, and 206 (5.6%) with prior aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients with larger aorta at baseline were older with higher tobacco use and prior prosthetic valves. Over a mean of 2.4 years, aortic growth was observed and differed by valve type (trileaflet valve: 0.08 mm/year , bicuspid valve: 0.4 mm/year , p<0.001). In six patients who developed aortic dissection the estimated average annual growth rate was 0.98 mm/year.

Conclusions: In a large echo cohort, aortic aneurysm growth rate was 0.08 mm/year though higher in those with bicuspid valves ( 0.4 mm/ year), but initial aortic size did not correlate with change in the aortic progression rate. This data may help inform recommended echocardiographic surveillance intervals.

大型超声心动图队列中的升主动脉扩大率:相关风险因素和不良主动脉事件。
背景:了解升主动脉瘤的生长和相关风险因素对于建议患者适当的超声心动图随访间隔至关重要。本研究旨在确定连续超声心动图上主动脉瘤的生长速度,以及导致基线主动脉大小和随后主动脉生长的临床和人口统计学变量:评估对象为五年内接受连续超声心动图检查的升主动脉瘤患者。升主动脉尺寸的测量是常规超声心动图检查的一部分。对包括主动脉瓣类型(三叶瓣、双尖瓣或人工瓣膜)在内的临床和人口统计学变量与基线主动脉大小以及主动脉进展率的关系进行了评估。记录了包括主动脉夹层、择期或急诊手术修复在内的临床事件:共发现 3639 名患者(78% 为男性,中位年龄为 69 岁,175 人(4.8%)患有双尖瓣,206 人(5.6%)曾接受过主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)。基线主动脉较大的患者年龄较大,吸烟率较高,并曾接受过人工瓣膜置换术。在平均 2.4 年的时间里,观察到主动脉增长,并因瓣膜类型而异(三叶瓣:0.08 毫米/年,双尖瓣:0.4 毫米/年,p 结论:在一个大型回声队列中,主动脉瘤的增长率为 0.08 毫米/年,但双尖瓣患者的增长率更高(0.4 毫米/年),但初始主动脉大小与主动脉瘤进展率的变化无关。这些数据有助于为建议的超声心动图监测间隔提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信