Outcomes of First-Line Microwave Ablation of Treatment-Naive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sheng Xu, Xin Nie, Lin Li, Zhi-Xin Bie, Yuan-Ming Li, Ping Zhang, Jing Qi, Jin-Zhao Peng, Xiao-Guang Li
{"title":"Outcomes of First-Line Microwave Ablation of Treatment-Naive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.","authors":"Sheng Xu, Xin Nie, Lin Li, Zhi-Xin Bie, Yuan-Ming Li, Ping Zhang, Jing Qi, Jin-Zhao Peng, Xiao-Guang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the outcomes of first-line image-guided microwave ablation (MWA) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and to compare with TKIs alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients between December 2015 and December 2021 and was divided into 2 groups (Group A: first-line MWA+TKIs; Group B: TKIs alone). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point, whereas overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point and were compared via the Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the predictors of PFS and OS. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was applied between Group B and the subgroup of complete ablation in Group A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients were included (Group A: n = 43; Group B: n = 74). In a mean follow-up of 47.0 months (SD ± 19.4), Group A had significantly longer median PFS (19.0 vs 10.0 months; P < .001) and OS (41.0 vs 25.0 months; P = .044) than Group B. Predictors of PFS included first-line MWA (P < .001) and tumor stage (P = .020), while that of OS included first-line MWA (P = 0.039), tumor stage (P = 0.014), and usage of third-generation TKIs (P = 0.001). There were 23 pairs of patients obtained after propensity score matching (Group A1: complete ablation+TKIs; Group B1: TKIs alone). Group A1 had significantly longer median PFS (24.0 vs 10.0 months; P < .001) and OS (48.0 vs 24.0 months; P = .012) than Group B1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>First-line MWA significantly improved the outcomes of patients with untreated EGFR-mutant advanced LUAD treated with TKIs. Complete ablation predicts a better prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the outcomes of first-line image-guided microwave ablation (MWA) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and to compare with TKIs alone.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients between December 2015 and December 2021 and was divided into 2 groups (Group A: first-line MWA+TKIs; Group B: TKIs alone). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point, whereas overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point and were compared via the Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the predictors of PFS and OS. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was applied between Group B and the subgroup of complete ablation in Group A.

Results: A total of 117 patients were included (Group A: n = 43; Group B: n = 74). In a mean follow-up of 47.0 months (SD ± 19.4), Group A had significantly longer median PFS (19.0 vs 10.0 months; P < .001) and OS (41.0 vs 25.0 months; P = .044) than Group B. Predictors of PFS included first-line MWA (P < .001) and tumor stage (P = .020), while that of OS included first-line MWA (P = 0.039), tumor stage (P = 0.014), and usage of third-generation TKIs (P = 0.001). There were 23 pairs of patients obtained after propensity score matching (Group A1: complete ablation+TKIs; Group B1: TKIs alone). Group A1 had significantly longer median PFS (24.0 vs 10.0 months; P < .001) and OS (48.0 vs 24.0 months; P = .012) than Group B1.

Conclusions: First-line MWA significantly improved the outcomes of patients with untreated EGFR-mutant advanced LUAD treated with TKIs. Complete ablation predicts a better prognosis.

用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期肺腺癌的一线微波消融疗效。
目的:研究一线影像引导下微波消融(MWA)+酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变晚期肺腺癌(LUAD)的疗效,并与单用TKIs进行比较:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年12月至2021年12月期间的患者,分为两组(A组:一线MWA+TKIs;B组:单用TKIs)。无进展生存期(PFS)为主要终点,总生存期(OS)为次要终点,并通过卡普兰-梅耶法进行比较。单变量和多变量分析用于研究无进展生存期和总生存期的预测因素。在B组和A组完全消融亚组之间采用倾向评分匹配(PSM;1:1比例):共纳入 117 名患者(A 组:43 人;B 组:74 人)。在平均47.0±19.4个月的随访中,A组的中位PFS明显更长(19.0个月对10.0个月,PC结论:一线MWA能明显改善接受TKIs治疗的未经治疗的表皮生长因子受体突变晚期LUAD患者的预后。完全消融预示着更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信