Implied occlusion and subset underestimation contribute to the weak-outnumber-strong numerosity illusion.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eliana G Dellinger, Katelyn M Becker, Frank H Durgin
{"title":"Implied occlusion and subset underestimation contribute to the weak-outnumber-strong numerosity illusion.","authors":"Eliana G Dellinger, Katelyn M Becker, Frank H Durgin","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.11.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four experimental studies are reported using a total of 712 participants to investigate the basis of a recently reported numerosity illusion called \"weak-outnumber-strong\" (WOS). In the weak-outnumber-strong illusion, when equal numbers of white and gray dots (e.g., 50 of each) are intermixed against a darker gray background, the gray dots seem much more numerous than the white. Two principles seem to be supported by these new results: 1) Subsets of mixtures are generally underestimated; thus, in mixtures of red and green dots, both sets are underestimated (using a matching task) just as the white dots are in the weak-outnumber-strong illusion, but 2) the gray dots seem to be filled in as if partially occluded by the brighter white dots. This second principle is supported by manipulations of depth perception both by pictorial cues (partial occlusion) and by binocular cues (stereopsis), such that the illusion is abolished when the gray dots are depicted as closer than the white dots, but remains strong when they are depicted as lying behind the white dots. Finally, an online investigation of a prior false-floor hypothesis concerning the effect suggests that manipulations of relative contrast may affect the segmentation process, which produces the visual bias known as subset underestimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"24 11","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.11.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four experimental studies are reported using a total of 712 participants to investigate the basis of a recently reported numerosity illusion called "weak-outnumber-strong" (WOS). In the weak-outnumber-strong illusion, when equal numbers of white and gray dots (e.g., 50 of each) are intermixed against a darker gray background, the gray dots seem much more numerous than the white. Two principles seem to be supported by these new results: 1) Subsets of mixtures are generally underestimated; thus, in mixtures of red and green dots, both sets are underestimated (using a matching task) just as the white dots are in the weak-outnumber-strong illusion, but 2) the gray dots seem to be filled in as if partially occluded by the brighter white dots. This second principle is supported by manipulations of depth perception both by pictorial cues (partial occlusion) and by binocular cues (stereopsis), such that the illusion is abolished when the gray dots are depicted as closer than the white dots, but remains strong when they are depicted as lying behind the white dots. Finally, an online investigation of a prior false-floor hypothesis concerning the effect suggests that manipulations of relative contrast may affect the segmentation process, which produces the visual bias known as subset underestimation.

隐含遮挡和子集低估是造成 "数字弱-数字强 "错觉的原因。
本文报告了四项实验研究,共使用了 712 名参与者,以调查最近报道的一种被称为 "弱-数-强"(WOS)的数字错觉的基础。在 "弱-数-强 "错觉中,当数量相等的白点和灰点(如各 50 个)混合在深灰色背景中时,灰点看起来比白点多得多。这些新结果似乎证明了两个原理:1)混合物的子集通常会被低估;因此,在红点和绿点的混合物中,两个子集都会被低估(使用匹配任务),就像白点在弱-数-强错觉中被低估一样;但是 2)灰点似乎被填满了,就像被更亮的白点部分遮住了一样。通过图像线索(部分遮挡)和双眼线索(立体视)对深度知觉进行处理,第二个原理得到了支持,当灰点被描绘成比白点更近时,错觉就会消失,但当灰点被描绘成位于白点后面时,错觉仍然很强烈。最后,通过对之前有关该效应的假底线假设进行在线调查,发现对相对对比度的操作可能会影响分割过程,从而产生被称为 "子集低估 "的视觉偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信