An Evaluation of a Proposed Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Model of Hearing-Health Care.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1789598
Jasleen Singh, Karen A Doherty
{"title":"An Evaluation of a Proposed Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Model of Hearing-Health Care.","authors":"Jasleen Singh, Karen A Doherty","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1789598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The introduction of over-the-counter hearing aids (HA) has resulted in a new hearing-health-care pathway.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The aim of this study was to assess if individuals could navigate four steps in a direct-to-consumer (DTC) HA delivery model, which include self-identification of hearing difficulties and risk for ear disease, self-selection of device, self-fitting and programming of device, and self-management.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> Fifty-two participants self-reported their degree of hearing loss and risk for ear disease. Participants were provided with three preselected DTC-HA Web sites and asked to select a device. Using the manufacturer's instructions, they then self-fit and programmed the device they chose. Participants' HA use and handling skills were evaluated using the Practical HA Skills Test-Revised (PHAST-R) and the Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA). Real-ear verification was completed to determine how closely they programmed their device to NAL-NL2 targets. Agreement between self-reported degree of hearing loss and ear disease was determined from an audiological and ear disease risk assessment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Seventy-five percent of participants reported that their perceived hearing loss was in the mild-to-moderate range. Ninety-three percent of participants who were identified to be at risk for ear disease did not self-report being at risk. PHAST-R scores ranged from 45 to 100% and were significantly impacted by manufacturer instructions. Only 24% of fittings were within the accepted tolerances for prescriptive targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> No participant was able to successfully navigate all four steps in the proposed DTC-HA model. Participants with hearing thresholds ≤ 25 dB HL and participants who were identified as being at risk for ear disease, but did not self-report the risk, both said they would purchase a DTC-HA as a treatment option. Manufacturer instructional materials can impact setup and programming of a DTC device. DTC models of hearing-health care may require additional consumer support.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":"34 1-02","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The introduction of over-the-counter hearing aids (HA) has resulted in a new hearing-health-care pathway.

Purpose:  The aim of this study was to assess if individuals could navigate four steps in a direct-to-consumer (DTC) HA delivery model, which include self-identification of hearing difficulties and risk for ear disease, self-selection of device, self-fitting and programming of device, and self-management.

Research design:  Fifty-two participants self-reported their degree of hearing loss and risk for ear disease. Participants were provided with three preselected DTC-HA Web sites and asked to select a device. Using the manufacturer's instructions, they then self-fit and programmed the device they chose. Participants' HA use and handling skills were evaluated using the Practical HA Skills Test-Revised (PHAST-R) and the Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA). Real-ear verification was completed to determine how closely they programmed their device to NAL-NL2 targets. Agreement between self-reported degree of hearing loss and ear disease was determined from an audiological and ear disease risk assessment, respectively.

Results:  Seventy-five percent of participants reported that their perceived hearing loss was in the mild-to-moderate range. Ninety-three percent of participants who were identified to be at risk for ear disease did not self-report being at risk. PHAST-R scores ranged from 45 to 100% and were significantly impacted by manufacturer instructions. Only 24% of fittings were within the accepted tolerances for prescriptive targets.

Conclusions:  No participant was able to successfully navigate all four steps in the proposed DTC-HA model. Participants with hearing thresholds ≤ 25 dB HL and participants who were identified as being at risk for ear disease, but did not self-report the risk, both said they would purchase a DTC-HA as a treatment option. Manufacturer instructional materials can impact setup and programming of a DTC device. DTC models of hearing-health care may require additional consumer support.

对拟议的直接面向消费者(DTC)听力保健模式进行评估。
背景:目的:本研究的目的是评估个人是否能够在直接面向消费者(DTC)的助听器提供模式中完成四个步骤,包括听力困难和耳病风险的自我识别、助听器的自我选择、助听器的自我装配和编程以及自我管理:研究设计:52 名参与者自我报告了听力损失程度和耳病风险。研究人员向参与者提供了三个预选的 DTC-HA 网站,并要求他们选择一种设备。然后,他们根据制造商的说明,对所选设备进行自我装配和编程。参与者的助听器使用和操作技能由实用助听器技能测试修订版(PHAST-R)和助听器听力康复自我效能测量(MARS-HA)进行评估。他们还完成了真耳验证,以确定他们是如何按照 NAL-NL2 目标对设备进行编程的。听力和耳病风险评估分别确定了自我报告的听力损失程度和耳病程度之间的一致性:75%的参与者表示,他们认为自己的听力损失属于轻度至中度范围。在被确定有耳病风险的参与者中,93%的人没有自我报告有耳病风险。PHAST-R 分数从 45 分到 100 分不等,受制造商说明的影响很大。只有 24% 的配件符合规定目标的公差要求:结论:没有一位参与者能够成功完成拟议的 DTC-HA 模型中的所有四个步骤。听力阈值低于 25 dB HL 的参与者和被确认有耳病风险但未自我报告风险的参与者都表示会购买 DTC-HA 作为治疗选择。制造商的指导材料会影响 DTC 设备的设置和编程。听力保健的 DTC 模式可能需要更多的消费者支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信