Clinical Effects of Voice Therapy on Vocal Outcomes in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: Proof-of-Concept Study for Two SOVT-Based Treatment Protocols.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Imke Kissel, Iris Meerschman, Evelien D'haeseleer, Tine Papeleu, Peter Tomassen, Sofie Claeys, Clara Leyns, Gwen Van Nuffelen, Kristiane Van Lierde
{"title":"Clinical Effects of Voice Therapy on Vocal Outcomes in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: Proof-of-Concept Study for Two SOVT-Based Treatment Protocols.","authors":"Imke Kissel, Iris Meerschman, Evelien D'haeseleer, Tine Papeleu, Peter Tomassen, Sofie Claeys, Clara Leyns, Gwen Van Nuffelen, Kristiane Van Lierde","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies on treatment efficacy in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) often lack a predetermined treatment protocol, and little is known about the effects of specific vocal techniques on vocal outcomes and quality of life in UVFP patients. The purpose of this preliminary proof-of-concept study is to investigate the effects and feasibility of two intensive treatment protocols based on water-resistance therapy (WRT) and vocal function exercises (VFE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants with acute or chronic UVFP/paresis were recruited in the study and randomly assigned to the WRT or VFE group. Three of these participants presented with aphonia and could not complete the program as prescribed. The remaining participants completed an intensive therapy program with the assigned vocal technique. Before, during, and after the program, a multidimensional voice assessment was performed. Maximum phonation time, acoustic, perceptual, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WRT and VFE had positive clinical effects on instrumental and auditory-perceptual voice quality, glottal closure, and PROMs, but interindividual variability was high. Studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm or refute these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WRT- and VFE-based therapy programs are both feasible and seem to elicit positive clinical changes in UVFP patients. Suggestions on how to improve the programs are provided, as well as considerations for implementation in clinical practice. Follow-up research is needed to examine the efficacy of both programs on group level.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies on treatment efficacy in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) often lack a predetermined treatment protocol, and little is known about the effects of specific vocal techniques on vocal outcomes and quality of life in UVFP patients. The purpose of this preliminary proof-of-concept study is to investigate the effects and feasibility of two intensive treatment protocols based on water-resistance therapy (WRT) and vocal function exercises (VFE).

Methods: Ten participants with acute or chronic UVFP/paresis were recruited in the study and randomly assigned to the WRT or VFE group. Three of these participants presented with aphonia and could not complete the program as prescribed. The remaining participants completed an intensive therapy program with the assigned vocal technique. Before, during, and after the program, a multidimensional voice assessment was performed. Maximum phonation time, acoustic, perceptual, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained.

Results: WRT and VFE had positive clinical effects on instrumental and auditory-perceptual voice quality, glottal closure, and PROMs, but interindividual variability was high. Studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm or refute these findings.

Conclusion: The WRT- and VFE-based therapy programs are both feasible and seem to elicit positive clinical changes in UVFP patients. Suggestions on how to improve the programs are provided, as well as considerations for implementation in clinical practice. Follow-up research is needed to examine the efficacy of both programs on group level.

嗓音治疗对单侧声带褶皱麻痹患者嗓音效果的临床影响:基于 SOVT 的两种治疗方案的概念验证研究
背景:有关单侧声带麻痹(UVFP)治疗效果的研究往往缺乏一个预先确定的治疗方案,而且人们对特定发声技术对 UVFP 患者发声效果和生活质量的影响知之甚少。这项初步概念验证研究的目的是调查基于水阻力疗法(WRT)和发声功能锻炼(VFE)的两种强化治疗方案的效果和可行性:研究招募了十名患有急性或慢性紫外线灼伤/瘫痪的患者,并将他们随机分配到水阻力疗法组或发声功能锻炼组。其中三人出现失声,无法按规定完成项目。其余参与者完成了指定发声技术的强化治疗计划。在项目开始前、进行中和结束后,都进行了多维度的嗓音评估。结果显示,WRT 和 VFE 对患者的嗓音有积极的改善作用:结果:WRT 和 VFE 对器质性嗓音、听觉-知觉嗓音质量、声门闭合和 PROMs 有积极的临床效果,但个体间差异很大。有必要进行样本量更大的研究,以证实或反驳这些发现:结论:以 WRT 和 VFE 为基础的治疗方案都是可行的,而且似乎能为 UVFP 患者带来积极的临床变化。本文还就如何改进治疗方案提出了建议,以及在临床实践中实施的注意事项。还需要进行后续研究,以考察这两种方案在群体层面的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信