Outcomes of STEMI Patients in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shiva Khaleghparast, Majid Maleki, Fereidoun Noohi, Mahmood Sheikh Fathollahi, Yasaman Khalili, Yeganeh Pasebani, Farnaz Rafiee, Fahimeh Farrokhzadeh, Sajjad Biglari, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh
{"title":"Outcomes of STEMI Patients in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shiva Khaleghparast, Majid Maleki, Fereidoun Noohi, Mahmood Sheikh Fathollahi, Yasaman Khalili, Yeganeh Pasebani, Farnaz Rafiee, Fahimeh Farrokhzadeh, Sajjad Biglari, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh","doi":"10.18502/ijph.v53i9.16451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has disrupted health systems and put a huge strain on hospitals and healthcare workers. Prioritizing COVID-19 patients in hospitals caused irreversible harm to cardiac patients. Although multiple studies have shown that ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients have worse admission circumstances than before the pandemic, the hospital outcomes of these patients have remained limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined STEMI patient outcomes during the COVID-19 epidemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic searches of MEDLINE (through PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase through Jan 10, 2021. All studies with reporting in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and door-to-balloon time with over twenty participants were included. Articles without clear definitions or results were excluded. The study followed PRISMA guidelines. The outcomes of interest were door-to-balloon time, death, and hospital stay during COVID-19 pandemic compared prior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our meta-analysis included 12 studies and 21170 people (115-6609). The pooled analysis showed significantly more pandemic mortality (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.07-1.43). Ten studies (13,091) recorded door-to-balloon times. Door-to-balloon time (in minutes) significantly increased during the pandemic (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]= 0.46; 95% CI: 0.03-0.89). The length of hospital stay was reported by five studies (n=9448). Length of hospital stay (in days) was not significantly longer during the pandemic than before the outbreak (SMD= 0.04; 95% CI: -0.19-0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with increased mortality and door-to-balloon delay that might be attributable to the strict infection control measures in outbreak. Studies with a longer follow-up time are needed to investigate the outcomes of STEMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49173,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","volume":"53 9","pages":"1964-1975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i9.16451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has disrupted health systems and put a huge strain on hospitals and healthcare workers. Prioritizing COVID-19 patients in hospitals caused irreversible harm to cardiac patients. Although multiple studies have shown that ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients have worse admission circumstances than before the pandemic, the hospital outcomes of these patients have remained limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined STEMI patient outcomes during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Methods: We conducted systematic searches of MEDLINE (through PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase through Jan 10, 2021. All studies with reporting in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and door-to-balloon time with over twenty participants were included. Articles without clear definitions or results were excluded. The study followed PRISMA guidelines. The outcomes of interest were door-to-balloon time, death, and hospital stay during COVID-19 pandemic compared prior.

Results: Our meta-analysis included 12 studies and 21170 people (115-6609). The pooled analysis showed significantly more pandemic mortality (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.07-1.43). Ten studies (13,091) recorded door-to-balloon times. Door-to-balloon time (in minutes) significantly increased during the pandemic (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]= 0.46; 95% CI: 0.03-0.89). The length of hospital stay was reported by five studies (n=9448). Length of hospital stay (in days) was not significantly longer during the pandemic than before the outbreak (SMD= 0.04; 95% CI: -0.19-0.26).

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with increased mortality and door-to-balloon delay that might be attributable to the strict infection control measures in outbreak. Studies with a longer follow-up time are needed to investigate the outcomes of STEMI patients.

COVID-19大流行中STEMI患者的预后:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:全球 SARS-CoV-2 大流行扰乱了医疗系统,给医院和医护人员造成了巨大压力。医院优先照顾 COVID-19 患者对心脏病患者造成了不可逆转的伤害。尽管多项研究表明,ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的入院情况比大流行之前更糟,但这些患者的住院治疗效果仍然有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了 COVID-19 流行期间 STEMI 患者的治疗效果:截至 2021 年 1 月 10 日,我们对 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Embase 进行了系统检索。所有报告了院内死亡率、住院时间和门到气球时间且参与者超过 20 人的研究均被纳入。没有明确定义或结果的文章被排除在外。研究遵循 PRISMA 指南。关注的结果是与之前相比,COVID-19 大流行期间的门到气球时间、死亡人数和住院时间:我们的荟萃分析包括 12 项研究和 21170 人(115-6609)。汇总分析结果显示,大流行期间的死亡率明显更高(OR=1.24;95% CI:1.07-1.43)。十项研究(13,091 人)记录了门到气球时间。在大流行期间,门到气球时间(以分钟为单位)明显增加(标准化平均差 [SMD]= 0.46;95% CI:0.03-0.89)。五项研究(n=9448)报告了住院时间。与疫情爆发前相比,大流行期间的住院时间(天数)并没有明显延长(SMD= 0.04;95% CI:-0.19-0.26):结论:COVID-19大流行与死亡率增加和 "门到气球 "延迟有关,这可能是由于疫情爆发时采取了严格的感染控制措施。需要进行更长时间的随访研究,以了解 STEMI 患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Iranian Journal of Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Public Health has been continuously published since 1971, as the only Journal in all health domains, with wide distribution (including WHO in Geneva and Cairo) in two languages (English and Persian). From 2001 issue, the Journal is published only in English language. During the last 41 years more than 2000 scientific research papers, results of health activities, surveys and services, have been published in this Journal. To meet the increasing demand of respected researchers, as of January 2012, the Journal is published monthly. I wish this will assist to promote the level of global knowledge. The main topics that the Journal would welcome are: Bioethics, Disaster and Health, Entomology, Epidemiology, Health and Environment, Health Economics, Health Services, Immunology, Medical Genetics, Mental Health, Microbiology, Nutrition and Food Safety, Occupational Health, Oral Health. We would be very delighted to receive your Original papers, Review Articles, Short communications, Case reports and Scientific Letters to the Editor on the above men­tioned research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信