Grasping the Concept of an Object at a Glance: Category Information Accessed by Brief Dichoptic Presentation

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Caitlyn Antal, Roberto G. de Almeida
{"title":"Grasping the Concept of an Object at a Glance: Category Information Accessed by Brief Dichoptic Presentation","authors":"Caitlyn Antal,&nbsp;Roberto G. de Almeida","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What type of conceptual information about an object do we get at a brief glance? In two experiments, we investigated the nature of conceptual tokening—the moment at which conceptual information about an object is accessed. Using a masked picture-word congruency task with dichoptic presentations at “brief” (50−60 ms) and “long” (190−200 ms) durations, participants judged the relation between a picture (e.g., a banana) and a word representing one of four property types about the object: superordinate (<i>fruit</i>), basic level (<i>banana</i>), a high-salient (<i>yellow</i>), or low-salient feature (<i>peel</i>). In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented in black-and-white; in Experiment 2, they were presented in red and blue, with participants wearing red-blue anaglyph glasses. This manipulation allowed for the independent projection of stimuli to the left- and right-hemisphere visual areas, aiming to probe the early effects of these projections in conceptual tokening. Results showed that superordinate and basic-level properties elicited faster and more accurate responses than high- and low-salient features at both presentation times. This advantage persisted even when the objects were divided into categories (e.g., <i>animals</i>, <i>vegetables, vehicles, tools</i>), and when objects contained high-salient visual features. However, contrasts between categories show that <i>animals</i>, <i>fruits</i>, and <i>vegetables</i> tend to be categorized at the superordinate level, while <i>vehicles</i> tend to be categorized at the basic level. Also, for a restricted class of objects, high-salient features representing diagnostic color information (<i>yellow</i> for the picture of a banana) facilitated congruency judgments to the same extent as that of superordinate and basic-level labels. We suggest that early access to object concepts yields superordinate and basic-level information, with features only yielding effects at a later stage of processing, unless they represent diagnostic color information. We discuss these results advancing a unified theory of conceptual representation, integrating key postulates of atomism and feature-based theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"48 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What type of conceptual information about an object do we get at a brief glance? In two experiments, we investigated the nature of conceptual tokening—the moment at which conceptual information about an object is accessed. Using a masked picture-word congruency task with dichoptic presentations at “brief” (50−60 ms) and “long” (190−200 ms) durations, participants judged the relation between a picture (e.g., a banana) and a word representing one of four property types about the object: superordinate (fruit), basic level (banana), a high-salient (yellow), or low-salient feature (peel). In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented in black-and-white; in Experiment 2, they were presented in red and blue, with participants wearing red-blue anaglyph glasses. This manipulation allowed for the independent projection of stimuli to the left- and right-hemisphere visual areas, aiming to probe the early effects of these projections in conceptual tokening. Results showed that superordinate and basic-level properties elicited faster and more accurate responses than high- and low-salient features at both presentation times. This advantage persisted even when the objects were divided into categories (e.g., animals, vegetables, vehicles, tools), and when objects contained high-salient visual features. However, contrasts between categories show that animals, fruits, and vegetables tend to be categorized at the superordinate level, while vehicles tend to be categorized at the basic level. Also, for a restricted class of objects, high-salient features representing diagnostic color information (yellow for the picture of a banana) facilitated congruency judgments to the same extent as that of superordinate and basic-level labels. We suggest that early access to object concepts yields superordinate and basic-level information, with features only yielding effects at a later stage of processing, unless they represent diagnostic color information. We discuss these results advancing a unified theory of conceptual representation, integrating key postulates of atomism and feature-based theories.

Abstract Image

把握物体一瞥的概念:通过简短的二分法演示获取类别信息。
我们在短暂的一瞥中获得了关于物体的哪类概念信息?在两项实验中,我们研究了概念标记的性质--获取物体概念信息的时刻。实验中,受试者通过 "短暂"(50-60 毫秒)和 "长时间"(190-200 毫秒)的二分法来完成一个图片-词语一致性任务,判断图片(如香蕉)和代表物体四种属性之一的词语之间的关系:上位属性(水果)、基本属性(香蕉)、高阈值属性(黄色)或低阈值属性(果皮)。在实验 1 中,刺激物以黑白形式呈现;在实验 2 中,刺激物以红色和蓝色形式呈现,参与者佩戴红蓝合成眼镜。这一操作允许刺激物独立投射到左右半球的视觉区域,旨在探究这些投射对概念标记的早期影响。结果表明,在两个呈现时间内,上位和基本位属性比高位和低位特征引起的反应更快、更准确。即使物体被分为不同类别(如动物、蔬菜、车辆、工具),以及物体包含高刺激视觉特征时,这种优势依然存在。然而,不同类别之间的对比显示,动物、水果和蔬菜倾向于被归类到上一级,而车辆则倾向于被归类到基本级。此外,对于有限的一类物体,代表诊断性颜色信息的高信号特征(香蕉图片中的黄色)与上位标签和基本标签在相同程度上促进了一致性判断。我们认为,早期获取物体概念会产生上位信息和基本信息,而特征只有在后期处理阶段才会产生效果,除非它们代表了诊断性的颜色信息。我们讨论的这些结果推进了概念表征的统一理论,整合了原子论和基于特征理论的关键假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信