Inhibitory control training to reduce appetitive behaviour: a meta-analytic investigation of effectiveness, potential moderators, and underlying mechanisms of change.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lauren H Iannazzo, Melissa J Hayden, Natalia S Lawrence, Naomi Kakoschke, Laura K Hughes, Kelly Van Egmond, Jarrad Lum, Petra K Staiger
{"title":"Inhibitory control training to reduce appetitive behaviour: a meta-analytic investigation of effectiveness, potential moderators, and underlying mechanisms of change.","authors":"Lauren H Iannazzo, Melissa J Hayden, Natalia S Lawrence, Naomi Kakoschke, Laura K Hughes, Kelly Van Egmond, Jarrad Lum, Petra K Staiger","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2410018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Inhibitory control training (ICT) is a cognitive intervention that has been suggested to reduce problematic appetitive behaviours, such as unhealthy eating and excessive alcohol consumption. We conducted a meta-analytic review of ICT for reducing appetitive behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two meta-analyses were conducted for behavioural (objective) outcomes and self-report outcomes, along with 14 moderator analyses, and two secondary analyses investigating changes in cue-devaluation and inhibitory control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 46 articles (67 effect sizes and 4231 participants) and four appetitive health behaviours (eating, drinking, smoking, gambling). A significant effect of ICT on behavioural outcomes was found (SMD = 0.241, <i>p</i> .001). The self-report outcomes meta-analysis was not significant (<i>p</i> > .05). Secondary analyses also demonstrated greater inhibitory control (<i>p</i> < .05) and cue devaluation (<i>p</i> < .05) following ICT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analytic review is the largest synthesis of ICT interventions for appetitive behaviours. ICT significantly reduced problematic eating behaviours when adopting behavioural outcomes, but this was not found for other appetitive behaviours. ICT also significantly improved inhibitory control and reduced cue evaluations. Further studies are required before drawing any conclusions regarding impacts on other appetitive behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2410018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Inhibitory control training (ICT) is a cognitive intervention that has been suggested to reduce problematic appetitive behaviours, such as unhealthy eating and excessive alcohol consumption. We conducted a meta-analytic review of ICT for reducing appetitive behaviours.

Methods: Two meta-analyses were conducted for behavioural (objective) outcomes and self-report outcomes, along with 14 moderator analyses, and two secondary analyses investigating changes in cue-devaluation and inhibitory control.

Results: The review included 46 articles (67 effect sizes and 4231 participants) and four appetitive health behaviours (eating, drinking, smoking, gambling). A significant effect of ICT on behavioural outcomes was found (SMD = 0.241, p .001). The self-report outcomes meta-analysis was not significant (p > .05). Secondary analyses also demonstrated greater inhibitory control (p < .05) and cue devaluation (p < .05) following ICT.

Conclusions: This meta-analytic review is the largest synthesis of ICT interventions for appetitive behaviours. ICT significantly reduced problematic eating behaviours when adopting behavioural outcomes, but this was not found for other appetitive behaviours. ICT also significantly improved inhibitory control and reduced cue evaluations. Further studies are required before drawing any conclusions regarding impacts on other appetitive behaviours.

抑制控制训练以减少食欲行为:对有效性、潜在调节因素和潜在变化机制的元分析调查。
背景/目的:抑制控制训练(ICT)是一种认知干预措施,被认为可以减少食欲问题行为,如不健康饮食和过度饮酒。我们对抑制控制训练用于减少食欲行为进行了一项荟萃分析综述:方法:我们对行为(客观)结果和自我报告结果进行了两项荟萃分析,同时还进行了 14 项调节因素分析,并对线索评估和抑制控制的变化进行了两项二次分析:综述包括 46 篇文章(67 个效应大小和 4231 名参与者)和四种食欲健康行为(饮食、饮酒、吸烟、赌博)。发现信息和通信技术对行为结果有明显影响(SMD = 0.241,p .001)。自我报告结果的荟萃分析结果不显著(P > .05)。二次分析还显示,在使用信息和通信技术后,抑制控制(p < .05)和线索贬值(p < .05)均有所增强:该荟萃分析综述是针对食欲行为的信息和通信技术干预措施的最大规模综述。在采用行为结果时,信息和通信技术大大减少了有问题的进食行为,但在其他食欲行为中却没有发现这种情况。信息和通信技术还能明显改善抑制控制,减少对暗示的评价。关于对其他食欲行为的影响,还需要进一步研究才能得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信