A community engagement program to improve awareness for credible online health information.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Journal of the Medical Library Association Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.5195/jmla.2024.1899
Shamly Austin, Emily Hughes, Haiyan Qu
{"title":"A community engagement program to improve awareness for credible online health information.","authors":"Shamly Austin, Emily Hughes, Haiyan Qu","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2024.1899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The volume of online health information available makes it difficult to navigate and check its validity and reliability. A community-based MedlinePlus training program was developed to improve participants' ability to access credible online health information.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The program was a public-private partnership between a managed care organization and four local public libraries. A total of eight programs were held between October and November 2017. Each program had a 30-minute cooking demonstration followed by a 30-minute training on access to and navigation of the MedlinePlus website. Program participants were Medicaid beneficiaries, dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, and community members from a Pennsylvania county (n=39). A pre-and post-training questionnaire was administered to assess participants' knowledge and practice, and their ability to access health information on the MedlinePlus website. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data collected during the MedlinePlus trainings. Results from the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test indicated no statistically significant change in participants' ability to access information (Z= -1.41, p=0.16) after attending the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the median pre- to post-program responses improved from 'incorrect' to 'correct,' the number of programs held, and low attendance might be the reason for non-significant results. Participants reported that the program was informative, the website was comprehensive and user-friendly, and they were impressed by the healthy and inexpensive meal preparation from discount store-bought food. Holding MedlinePlus training programs in conjunction with a cooking program and collaborating with local public libraries might be a promising format that needs additional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"112 4","pages":"341-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The volume of online health information available makes it difficult to navigate and check its validity and reliability. A community-based MedlinePlus training program was developed to improve participants' ability to access credible online health information.

Case presentation: The program was a public-private partnership between a managed care organization and four local public libraries. A total of eight programs were held between October and November 2017. Each program had a 30-minute cooking demonstration followed by a 30-minute training on access to and navigation of the MedlinePlus website. Program participants were Medicaid beneficiaries, dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, and community members from a Pennsylvania county (n=39). A pre-and post-training questionnaire was administered to assess participants' knowledge and practice, and their ability to access health information on the MedlinePlus website. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data collected during the MedlinePlus trainings. Results from the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test indicated no statistically significant change in participants' ability to access information (Z= -1.41, p=0.16) after attending the program.

Conclusion: Although the median pre- to post-program responses improved from 'incorrect' to 'correct,' the number of programs held, and low attendance might be the reason for non-significant results. Participants reported that the program was informative, the website was comprehensive and user-friendly, and they were impressed by the healthy and inexpensive meal preparation from discount store-bought food. Holding MedlinePlus training programs in conjunction with a cooking program and collaborating with local public libraries might be a promising format that needs additional research.

社区参与计划,提高对可信在线健康信息的认识。
背景:现有的在线健康信息数量庞大,难以浏览和检查其有效性和可靠性。我们开发了一个基于社区的 MedlinePlus 培训项目,以提高参与者获取可信在线健康信息的能力:该项目是一个管理性医疗机构与当地四家公共图书馆之间的公私合作项目。在2017年10月至11月期间共举办了8个项目。每个项目都有 30 分钟的烹饪演示,随后是 30 分钟的 MedlinePlus 网站访问和导航培训。计划参与者包括医疗补助受益人、符合医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格的受益人以及宾夕法尼亚州某县的社区成员(人数=39)。培训前后进行了问卷调查,以评估参与者的知识和实践,以及他们在 MedlinePlus 网站上获取健康信息的能力。我们对 MedlinePlus 培训期间收集的数据进行了回顾性分析。Wilcoxon Signed Rank 检验的结果表明,参加培训后,学员获取信息的能力没有发生显著变化(Z=-1.41,P=0.16):结论:尽管从参加计划前到参加计划后的回答中位数从 "不正确 "提高到了 "正确",但举办计划的次数和参加人数较少可能是导致结果不显著的原因。参与者表示,该计划信息量大,网站内容全面,用户界面友好,用折扣店购买的食品烹制健康、廉价的膳食给他们留下了深刻印象。将 MedlinePlus 培训项目与烹饪项目结合起来,并与当地公共图书馆合作,可能是一种很有前景的形式,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信