Measurement of Pancreatic Stone Protein Compared with C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in an Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.
Septian Adi Permana, Purwoko, Enrico Jonathan Hartono
{"title":"Measurement of Pancreatic Stone Protein Compared with C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in an Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Septian Adi Permana, Purwoko, Enrico Jonathan Hartono","doi":"10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis remains a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU), with prompt diagnosis and management being critical to improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools for identifying and predicting sepsis outcomes, with pancreatic stone protein (PSP), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as three promising candidates. This systematic review aimed to analyse and compare the diagnostic accuracy of PSP, PCT and CRP regarding sepsis in the ICU. A review of the literature on the diagnostic performance of the three biomarkers was performed using PubMed Central, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Oxford Academic, SpringerLink and Cochrane Library. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the three biomarkers were extracted, compared, and represented as the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Three studies examining PSP, PCT and CRP biomarkers in 858 adult patients admitted to the ICU were included in this review. Compared with PCT and CRP, the PSP biomarker, with its unique applications and properties that may potentially benefit patients, doctors and hospitals, performed well and proved reliable in diagnosing sepsis in adult patients. PSP demonstrated reliability in sepsis diagnosis. Further analysis should be conducted to establish a formal, appropriate indication, as well as to determine a suspected sepsis patient's condition when testing each biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"31 5","pages":"32-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sepsis remains a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU), with prompt diagnosis and management being critical to improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools for identifying and predicting sepsis outcomes, with pancreatic stone protein (PSP), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as three promising candidates. This systematic review aimed to analyse and compare the diagnostic accuracy of PSP, PCT and CRP regarding sepsis in the ICU. A review of the literature on the diagnostic performance of the three biomarkers was performed using PubMed Central, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Oxford Academic, SpringerLink and Cochrane Library. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the three biomarkers were extracted, compared, and represented as the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Three studies examining PSP, PCT and CRP biomarkers in 858 adult patients admitted to the ICU were included in this review. Compared with PCT and CRP, the PSP biomarker, with its unique applications and properties that may potentially benefit patients, doctors and hospitals, performed well and proved reliable in diagnosing sepsis in adult patients. PSP demonstrated reliability in sepsis diagnosis. Further analysis should be conducted to establish a formal, appropriate indication, as well as to determine a suspected sepsis patient's condition when testing each biomarker.
期刊介绍:
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.